by TheTurtle » Sat 15 Jul 2006, 16:08:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('drew', ' ')This doesn't leave much for the anti-peakers, which is why they leave.
An anti-peaker coming to PO.com is like an evangelical Christian hoping to find meaningful debate on an atheist website (or, for that matter, an atheist trying to convert members of a Christian website).
Someone who does not believe that oil is going to peak, might just as well try to convince us that the Earth is flat or that it does not orbit around the sun.
The FACT of Peak Oil is not really open to debate, as I see it. What is open to debate is WHEN oil is going to peak (2005, IMO - already peaked) and what the ramifications of that peaking might be (dire, IMO). I'll listen to someone's argument about why they think oil hasn't yet peaked or why they don't think the consequences will be significant, but I really have no interest in listening to someone who doesn't even believe that oil is finite.
If you don't believe PO is real, spend your time at Peakoildebunked.com and don't waste our time here.
Just my personal opinions, of course, and not necessarily those of PO.com.
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)