Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby Lore » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 15:30:05

Giving up other things in a post peak oil world is the start of the economic death spiral. As predicted. You don't grow a capitalist society by the contraction of consumption in the trade off for ever more expensive energy. Pretty soon you'll be asking yourself, "who runs Barter Town"?
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 15:39:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')epends on when you measure it I guess. If you drilled all your Bakken wells in Year 1 and measured them, the declines would be different than if you waited a few years and measured them. Obviously you would have a lower overall rate, but also a lower decline rate. Found this publication recently and if I had the time I could pull the mean decline off the type curves provided by the USGS. Figures 5,6,7 and 8 appearing to be those of relevance.


I've posted about this a couple of times previously. The major disagreements between individuals such a Dave Hughes and Art Berman and pretty much everyone who actually works on shale oil/gas projects is the nature of the decline. No one argues that initial exponential declines are very steep...up to 75% over the first 24 months often, where the argument lies is in what happens after. Whereas Berman argues that it will just be complete exponential decline the argument from the science side of things (Terry Engelder as an example of a rock physicist whose spent time understanding the mechanics) is that through time the decline switches such that the decline rate drops radically year on year. One of the problems with the latter theory is the tendency for decline to approach zero which is often handled through cutoffs at some point....this being handled through phase flow models. Assuming the rock physicists and industry insiders are correct (and I believe they are based on my own experience) then the way of looking at this is if the bottom of the curve for the average Eagle Ford shale oil well is 25 bopd then how many wells does it take to have a sustained number of years with total rates of say 500,000 bopd (the answer is 20,000). Given that each well could drain say 80 acres (assuming fracs out 150 m and stimulated length of a km) then you would need the play to be developed on 80 acre spacing over 2500 sections of land if my maths are correct. Not sure how reasonable that is, a lot of wellheads. Of course longer horizontals and 2 or more sidetracks from a given vertical hole might lower that density but still a lot of wellheads.

I found the more interesting point in the BP review is that although production growth seems to be in the US the current and predicted continued growth in demand is in the Asia. Note that although North American production growth was significant there was a decline in demand of 2% in the US and 1% in Canada. Those declines were offset by increases in demand in Asia and you could argue that that increase over the past decade has amounted to around 10 MMbbl/d of demand increase. If Asia doesn't slow down considerably it would require the US (or somewhere else) to continually add 1 MMbl/d of supply. I suspect that is a bridge too far.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby John_A » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 16:32:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'G')iving up other things in a post peak oil world is the start of the economic death spiral. As predicted.


Economists call it "substitution", not "death spiral". And many things have been predicted for peak oil, and if you like Rockmans POD concept, we have been living them for decades now, some of us were born and raised in POD and we are all still here, most of us (except Beery1, he rocks! [smilie=headbang.gif] ) still motoring around paying for gasoline (like you and me).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '
') You don't grow a capitalist society by the contraction of consumption in the trade off for ever more expensive energy. Pretty soon you'll be asking yourself, "who runs Barter Town"?


The MadMax scenarios are just so...fast crashish. What a capitalist society does which has plenty of energy and a slowly decreasing supply of a particular type is called substitution. For example, people use less of crude oil to heat their home, and instead install a line for the countries plentiful natural gas supplies. Or passive solar. Or panels on the roof for electrical generation. Microgeneration of electricity from natural gas. While expensive liquid fuels can be expensive, there is no requirement we drive around in monster trucks, and we certainly aren't entering a "death spiral" because the "man" of the family doesn't drive one of these anymore. It's all just so 70's-ish.

Image
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby Oily Stuff » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 17:18:41

Oily Stuff
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed 17 Apr 2013, 14:24:43
Location: Texas

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby Pops » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 17:31:20

Thanks OS

Frackers will "move down the continuum of sweetness".

LOL, I like it, sounds almost appealing.

.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby Oily Stuff » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 17:43:44

Pops, yes; I liked that too!
Oily Stuff
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed 17 Apr 2013, 14:24:43
Location: Texas

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby John_A » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 18:15:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Oily Stuff', 'H')oly Schnikies, looky here:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopher ... you-think/


That's a good article. Certainly doesn't discount the sheer quantity of shale oil and gas, just its price, and everyone interested in peak oil knows that it is all about the price, never the "running out".
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby Lore » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 18:23:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '
')Economists call it "substitution", not "death spiral". And many things have been predicted for peak oil, and if you like Rockmans POD concept, we have been living them for decades now, some of us were born and raised in POD and we are all still here, most of us (except Beery1, he rocks! [smilie=headbang.gif] ) still motoring around paying for gasoline (like you and me).


You're talking semantics and as they say, especially with economists, past performance Is not an indication of future results. This is going to be a long process escalating downwards. Only someone in ignorant bliss or denial would assume otherwise.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby C8 » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 18:33:02

quote c8: The sense of urgency for an energy transition to non-fossil fuel sources has greatly diminished since the story hit.

John A reply:
It has. And it has also triggered the types of exponential growth in renewables necessary to put a real smackdown on the fossil fuel racket sometime in the not so distant future.


I'm not seeing the causal link between more fracking/shale leading to more renewables, can you explain?
User avatar
C8
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Sun 14 Apr 2013, 09:02:48

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby Oily Stuff » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 18:39:24

C8, time out for a sec; please tell me the name of that pretty little frog you use as a photo, where he from comes; he is a stunning looking guy, really. Thanks.
Oily Stuff
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed 17 Apr 2013, 14:24:43
Location: Texas

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby C8 » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 18:45:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '
')While expensive liquid fuels can be expensive, there is no requirement we drive around in monster trucks, and we certainly aren't entering a "death spiral" because the "man" of the family doesn't drive one of these anymore. It's all just so 70's-ish.


Unless, you are a minimum wage worker who is evicted and therefore can't get to work and loses his job because the gas money ate too much of his wages and he couldn't afford rent. The world isn't a suburb.
User avatar
C8
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Sun 14 Apr 2013, 09:02:48
Top

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby John_A » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 19:29:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '
')Economists call it "substitution", not "death spiral". And many things have been predicted for peak oil, and if you like Rockmans POD concept, we have been living them for decades now, some of us were born and raised in POD and we are all still here, most of us (except Beery1, he rocks! [smilie=headbang.gif] ) still motoring around paying for gasoline (like you and me).


You're talking semantics and as they say, especially with economists, past performance Is not an indication of future results.


Death spirals are not economic substitution. No different than a family being priced out of the steak market, and buying chicken instead. No death spiral of any kind required, just a change is all.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', '
') This is going to be a long process escalating downwards. Only someone in ignorant bliss or denial would assume otherwise.


All things end. The only question is when, and how. And sometimes, those things ending is good (the dark ages, monopoly of the church on western european society, slavery, the use of fossil fuels).
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36
Top

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby John_A » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 19:34:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('C8', '[')i]quote c8: The sense of urgency for an energy transition to non-fossil fuel sources has greatly diminished since the story hit.

John A reply:
It has. And it has also triggered the types of exponential growth in renewables necessary to put a real smackdown on the fossil fuel racket sometime in the not so distant future.

I'm not seeing the causal link between more fracking/shale leading to more renewables, can you explain?


Sure. Fracking (the kind going on now, not the kind started back in the 40's) has led to civic awareness and outcry.

http://www.marcellusprotest.org/

Civic interest, followed by protest and NIMBYISM leads to people thinking about choices, and the alternatives available. And presto..those alternatives don't look so bad anymore, really, when the argument is presented as polluted ground water and you dying from strange and exotic diseases you can't even see, but lurking in your well water, this thing whacking the occasional bald eagle doesn't seem so bad.

Image
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36
Top

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby John_A » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 19:49:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('C8', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('John_A', '
')While expensive liquid fuels can be expensive, there is no requirement we drive around in monster trucks, and we certainly aren't entering a "death spiral" because the "man" of the family doesn't drive one of these anymore. It's all just so 70's-ish.


Unless, you are a minimum wage worker who is evicted and therefore can't get to work and loses his job because the gas money ate too much of his wages and he couldn't afford rent. The world isn't a suburb.


True. My recommendation is strive to be more than a minimum wage worker but if that is what you are, feel fortunate that Obama is handing out unemployment compensation for many years, and then you can apply for disability and stay on that for the rest of your life supported by those who worked hard enough to NOT be minimum wage workers.

But you, and I, and many others who live in the developed world and waste all the oil can generally choose where we WANT to live. Making a choice means you have evaluated the pros and cons of that location, and from that point in time afterwards, the consequences of that decision aren't something you get to complain about.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36
Top

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 20:09:40

“…and if you like Rockmans POD concept, we have been living them for decades now”. It’s easy for me to point to my career starting in 1975 as being born into the POD. But the POD covers such a wide range of dynamics it doesn’t affect everyone at the same time to the same degree. And not always in a negative fashion. The late 70’s oil boom I walked into was probably more coincidental to the US reaching PO just a few years earlier. So BOOM! Oil prices jump…Iran makes noise about an embargo…folks panic…we have over 4,500 rigs drilling. And then high oil prices drive the world into a deep recession, hundreds of oil operators go under, many tens of thousands in the oil patch join the recession spawned unemployed overnight. And then US economy enjoys $10 oil. And economic growth once again begins.

High oil prices, low oil prices, high unemployment (in some segments), low unemployment (in some segments), lots of drilling…drilling bust, increased consumption…decreased consumption, focus on conservation…don’t care about conservation. The POD isn’t just about peak rates or low production rates. Not just about increasing but decreasing consumption also. Not just about high oil prices but low prices also. When in the last 30+ years has one segment prospered as a result of the then current price of oil, either high or low, and other segments felt the pain? IOW when hasn’t the POD affected some portions of the economy in a positive and negative fashion at the same time?

As Dickens said: The best of times…the worst of times. A tale of two sides of the same coin.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby C8 » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 21:02:32

Image

Apologize for this OT spoof on BP spill- learning how to do pix and need this as reference
Last edited by C8 on Thu 13 Jun 2013, 21:20:43, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
C8
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Sun 14 Apr 2013, 09:02:48

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby C8 » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 21:19:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Oily Stuff', 'C')8, time out for a sec; please tell me the name of that pretty little frog you use as a photo, where he from comes; he is a stunning looking guy, really. Thanks.


Red eyed tree frog from what I read. Just seemed like my kinda guy! Here are some facts from wiki:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he red-eyed tree frog (Agalychnis callidryas) is an arboreal hylid native to Neotropical rainforests in Central America.

As its name suggests, the red-eyed tree frog has red eyes with vertically narrowed pupils. It has a vibrant green body with yellow and blue vertically striped sides. Its webbed feet and toes are orange or red. The skin on the red-eyed tree frog's stomach is soft and fragile skin, whereas the back is thicker and rougher.

The red-eyed tree frog has three eyelids, and sticky pads on its toes. Phyllomedusid tree frogs are arboreal animals, meaning they spend a majority of their lives in trees; they are excellent jumpers.

Red-eyed tree frogs in axillary amplexus
Red-eyed tree frogs are not poisonous and rely on camouflage to protect themselves. During the day, they remain motionless, cover their blue sides with their back legs, tuck their bright feet under their stomachs, and shut their red eyes. Thus, they appear almost completely green, and well hidden among the foliage.



Image
User avatar
C8
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Sun 14 Apr 2013, 09:02:48
Top

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby Oily Stuff » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 21:23:05

That is one awesome little frog, thank you.
Oily Stuff
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed 17 Apr 2013, 14:24:43
Location: Texas

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby John_A » Thu 13 Jun 2013, 21:29:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '')…and if you like Rockmans POD concept, we have been living them for decades now”. It’s easy for me to point to my career starting in 1975 as being born into the POD. But the POD covers such a wide range of dynamics it doesn’t affect everyone at the same time to the same degree.


Of course it doesn't. Which is why it is so beautiful. You could just as easily call it peakoilonomics and it would work just as you've said. Wonderful concept, time to evolve peak oil date fascination and production rate fascination and all those nasty, quantifiable details into something more qualitative like POD.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Rockman', '
')As Dickens said: The best of times…the worst of times. A tale of two sides of the same coin.


Yup. Amazed every engineering student on the country isn't getting into petroleum engineering, but I suppose it is the highest paid bachelor degree because they have to learn some math and whatnot, and heaven forbid normal high school students were taught that during whatever passes for a self esteem building exercise high school diploma nowadays.
45ACP: For when you want to send the very best.
John_A
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2011, 21:16:36
Top

Re: BP review: U.S. tops global oil, gas production growth

Unread postby ralfy » Fri 14 Jun 2013, 03:16:46

What Westexas shared is important. The same goes for increasing consumption for the rest of the world.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 187 guests