If the house and the congress value the democratic principles then we should not see a deal before the 2nd of august. Representatives have the legal and moral obligation to thoroughly review the legislation put before them. Certainly an important piece like this.
Step 1: Introduction
Step 2: Committee Consideration
Step 3: Committee Action
Step 4: Subcommittee Review
Step 5: Mark Up
Step 6: Committee Action -- Reporting a Bill
Step 7: Publication of Committee Report
Step 8: Floor Action -- Legislative Calendar
Step 9: Debate
Step 10: Voting
Step 11: Bill Referred to Other Chamber
Step12: Conference Committee
Step 13: Final Action - Enrollment
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongres ... rocess.htmThat takes time and I can well imagine that a few will refuse to sign a piece of legislation that is forced upon them by holding a gun to their head.
Another risk is that seeing the importance of this bill many will seize the opportunity to add a few earmarks for their votes. That will slow down the process and reduce the net savings by such a proposal.
I can see some sort of tentative deal being reached before the 2nd but certainly not put into legislation. What the market reaction will be I'm not sure. There is still a great deal of confidence in the US out there. If there is a deal presented with sufficient theatrical acts of cross-party unity, this might not trigger an immediate reaction but it does set the stage for a further erosion of the dollar.
What might be important is that after the debt limit is raised the US has to quickly put out $300b in bonds to repay Geithners "special measures" (make up for missed payments of the past few months). That would also make the US pass the 100% GDP limit on debt and within inches of the 70% limit for the public debt (AAA requirement of S&P). If that hits prime time it could well trigger the markets into a strong negative reaction.