Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Blowhards think windfall-Profits wrong target of oil anger

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Blowhards think windfall-Profits wrong target of oil anger

Unread postby LadyRuby » Fri 28 Apr 2006, 13:27:25

Wow, actually mentions "peak oil."

Blowhards think windfall - Commentary: Profits are the wrong target of oil anger

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..Since the early 1970s there has been talk of "peak oil" scenarios where demand would quickly eclipse supply. (We've had tastes of it during oil embargoes.)

Since, oil companies having been struggling to find new reserves and the amount of oil imported by the U.S. has skyrocketed; in 1998 oil imports finally exceeded 50% of domestic consumption. So we knew these times would come.

Lawmakers could have done something along the way. They could have provided incentives for the development of other sources of power, but they succumbed to the powerful lobbying of the automotive industry and oil producers. Facing public pressure, they now want to turn on these industries.

A "punishment" tax, as The New York Times calls the windfall tax, isn't in order. Nor should oil firms be "cast as villains" as The Los Angles Times reports.

An incentive program as President Bush promoted in his State of The Union speech should be expedited.

That likely won't occur. Instead, there is desperate search for a fall guy.

...
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Re: Blowhards think windfall-Profits wrong target of oil ang

Unread postby Leanan » Fri 28 Apr 2006, 14:21:44

At that wacky fringe site, MarketWatch, no less. 8O
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Blowhards think windfall-Profits wrong target of oil ang

Unread postby gego » Fri 28 Apr 2006, 18:51:52

In a free economy, when something is scarce, the price increases as an incentive for suppliers to supply more. To impose a tax on "excess profits" (whatever that is) takes away incentive for oil companies to risk money on finding more oil.

There are plenty of examples of individuals or companies making huge sums, but nobody seems to be screaming about their good fortune because they are not paying them directly at seemingly rapidly increasing rates. Look at how much Bill Gates made, or look at the recently reported multi-million contract for Katie Couric to be anchor of one of the nightly news shows; can you imagine making millions per year just to sit in front of a camera and read from a teleprompter.

In my opinion, the only profits which are obsene are those derived from grants of government privelege, like the cable companies who seem to increase prices at will since they have little competition. And this is nothing compared to the huge profits that banks make, operating with the government granted privelege of loaning new money into existence.

The American public for the most part are brain dead.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Blowhards think windfall-Profits wrong target of oil ang

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sat 29 Apr 2006, 20:19:39

The redneck socialist hillbillies where I live are jumping up and down screaming for the government to "Do Something!" to the "big oil companies".
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron