by AdamB » Sun 26 Feb 2017, 11:17:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sparky', '.')
one of the post , long time ago by an oilman , mentioned that the Ghawar water cut was above 50% when it started producing
When it started producing? Well...good thing it has produced 60+ billion barrels since then, continues to produce millions of barrels a day now, and it hasn't apparently mattered. And, as demonstrated by Wilmington, might be able to get to 96% water cut, and still might not matter.
Water cut is relevant to the economic calculation of oil/gas production, the number all by itself is just the type of breathless noise that the likes of Simmons once focused on. Which is why those who knew better didn't pay attention to his nonsense when he was alive, or any accountant on matters of reservoir dynamics, let alone the project economics of a particular oil field's development.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."
Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"