by Outcast_Searcher » Fri 16 Aug 2019, 21:32:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')he author of this "report" is shorting GE stock with a third party. Grain of salt is about what I would give it. If the author had something credible he should have given it to the SEC and not leaked it to affect stock prices.
1). According to the articles I read (on NYT and Bloomberg), he DID submit the report to the SEC.
2). This is the same guy who was right about Enron, and he gave that info to the SEC and the SEC repeatedly ignored it, much to their embarrassment. Maybe they'll actually check it out this time.
...
I'm not saying this has legs. I'm saying it's worth a look, and your assumption on him not telling the SEC is wrong.
When GE got very low in early 2009, I was afraid to buy a bunch of it because I was concerned about the possibility of accounting fraud, and how complex their books are.
I think just flat ruling it out because of false assumptions is a bad idea.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.