by Sixstrings » Mon 04 Jun 2012, 23:26:52
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'R')eality is the retirement age will not go up or down, regardless of policy. The amount (in real terms) is only headed one way. The age at which payments start etc. is another question. (if you put in the wrong data you know what kind of answer you will get?)
Well that's true.
What I actually think will happen is inflation.. it's what Russia did to its pensioners after the collapse of the USSR. So, in the coming years look for the US gov to start redefining COLA increases to SS (inflation adjustments). I *think* they already did that and and old folks haven't gotten any raise for a few years.
That's the first step, unpeg the SS checks from inflation, either totally or partially. Next step, inflate the dollar a lot more.. and
voila you've devalued pension payouts and most won't complain because they still get their pension check, yet a gallon milk will cost $15.
Still though.. if anyone out there has 401ks and IRAs, you've got to watch these congrescritters like a hawk and if there's talk about taking your money away from you then I suggest even Tea Partiers should trade in their tri corner hat for a pitch fork. (figuratively)
And Plant is right in his post above. Which is why I say if you want these bennies cut, you can just vote Democrat, we're only talking degrees of cuts here. And at least in the Democratic Party there's a constituency that will raise hell if they want to crank that age up to 75 or 80 -- age increase to 70 is already in the cards.. maybe I'm unfortunate to be working class, maybe none of you know anyone who is 63 and barely getting by with all kinds of health problems, but I do.
It's all relative I guess, how we see things depends on where we stand. But in my world, it's not just working and lower middle class, I know very wealthy people who have their parents on medicaid for poor elderly. What they do is transfer all the assets from the parent, so they qualify.