Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

2010 US elections

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 08:48:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', ' ')political paralysis....


Somehow Bill Clinton managed quite nicely when the 1994 election produced a Republican landslide and takeover of the House. Clinton had no problem signing Republican bills that produced balanced budgets, welfare reform, and full employment.

Why do you think Obama will be so much more inflexible then Clinton was? :)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Sixstrings » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 10:53:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cid_Yama', 'N')onsense. If the Republicans win, the average American will be kicked to the gutter.


Cid, I don't think the voters care. They're pushing the panic button on this one.. they know things are very bad and the Dems aren't doing squat about it so they're voting for the other guy.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 11:33:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', ' ')political paralysis....


Somehow Bill Clinton managed quite nicely when the 1994 election produced a Republican landslide and takeover of the House. Clinton had no problem signing Republican bills that produced balanced budgets, welfare reform, and full employment.

Why do you think Obama will be so much more inflexible then Clinton was? :)

Somehow there was still more pie to eat during Clinton era eg growing economy, property boom taking off etc.
Means more redundancy in the system.
More options to play with.

Obama is totally cornered.
Financial crisis, bankrupt economy, collapsing dollar, peak oil begins to bite.
He is directly on collision course with Republicans over health care reform bill (I can already imagine nice clinch unfolding with Republicans refusing to fund it).

Somehow I have an impression that Obama is a great showman, but not really a successful president.
Maybe it is a harsh judgment.
One can argue that Obama was nominated to be a captain of a stalled plane...

Again, liberal system is not a sustainable one and if one insist to run it regardless, bankruptcy is the only possible outcome.
America has run out of of other peoples money.
So yes, most of features known as welfare or Social Security will have to be dismantled either by design or by default.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Mesuge » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 11:37:58

Ludi, that would be rather unfair, I've got a couple of friends, even relatives with one or both feets stateside. However, the simple fact is that the U.S. public last "pitchfork" moment was right after Nov/22/63 or perhaps five years later, hm and they just rolled over like ultra lama-sheep. Now, several additional chapters of horrors after that, and it's beyond repair, don't kid yourself there are any rights and privilliges left in the current system.
Once the mirage aka wheels of consumerism (paid by the rest of the world) fall off, it will show its true ugly face, a south american style neofeudal dictatorship. Can't wait when the whores like Huffington will have to seek political asyleum from gloves off U.S. nazis in places like Venezuela :twisted:
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Fishman » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 14:21:18

Vts
You assume the Dems in the Senate will hold as strong a line as the Republicans did the last two years. Won't happen. They will see the writing on the wall from this election, vote WITH Republicans in the Senate on several occasions in the next two years, overcoming any Obama veto. This ball is in play.
Poor Cid, the Democrats and especially the progressive movement hitched themselves to the least experienced politician to hold the presidency in over a hundred years. They would have been so much better off with Hilleary. Now they are derailed, the conservative right is politically active as no time in the last 50 years. White guilt has been cured almost enmass, conservative women and african-americans abound. Obama, at least for the Democrats future, is the WORST president possible, enjoy.
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 14:40:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Mesuge', ' ')don't kid yourself there are any rights and privilliges left in the current system.:



Actually, there are. I can get contraceptives. I can drive my car to the polling place. I can type "wow, what a moron" on the internet.

These things may all be an illusion, not really possible, but I don't believe that and I don't think you believe it either. :|
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 14:44:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', ' ')They will see the writing on the wall from this election, vote WITH Republicans in the Senate on several occasions in the next two years, overcoming any Obama veto.



Because just like conservatives, Democratic politicians think the folks who voted for him are disappointed with Obama because he's too left wing, when in fact, they are disappointed that he's barely left wing at all.

Why do conservatives and Democratic politicians always get this wrong? Because they actually don't care to pay attention to what progressives actually say and think.

They are acting from ignorance when they "see the writing on the wall." They aren't seeing the writing at all, they are seeing something completely different.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Fishman » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 15:05:42

Or Ludi, since progressives make up such a small part of the electorate, and disappointment in Obama extends far more than whether he's right, middle, or left, any politician with any sense will leave him high and dry.

"Because they actually don't care to pay attention to what progressives actually say and think" Actually, I think most have paid attention, listened to the progressives, and realized "oh, s**t, these guys are crazy"
Obama, the FUBAR presidency gets scraped off the boot
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 15:33:44

Personally, I'm looking forward to telling each of my neighbors that "repealing Obamacare" will mean that each of them will be called upon to sacrafice the life of a child on the altar of ideological purity, since any of their children that has asthma, autism, dyslexia, allergies, or anything else will never get medical insurance.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 15:55:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'P')ersonally, I'm looking forward to telling each of my neighbors that "repealing Obamacare" will mean that each of them will be called upon to sacrafice the life of a child on the altar of ideological purity, since any of their children that has asthma, autism, dyslexia, allergies, or anything else will never get medical insurance.



Oh well, that's what they want! (see Fishman's post above)
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 16:02:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', ' ')Actually, I think most have paid attention, listened to the progressives, and realized "oh, s**t, these guys are crazy"



I guess I wonder which progressives you're listening to. :?:

What's crazy about civil rights, workers' rights, fair elections, health care, protecting the biosphere, energy independence, science and technology,open government,immigration reform,retirement security, and national security?

:?:
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 16:05:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'd')isappointment in Obama extends far more than whether he's right, middle, or left,



Wow, really. So it's not his policies or actions that have been disappointing, but something about him as a person that has been so disappointing?

You'd think people would like the guy a little better because of all the tax break he's given the middle class, but I guess not....and I though folks worried so much about their taxes.....

:?:
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 16:08:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Fishman', 'V')ts
You assume the Dems in the Senate will hold as strong a line as the Republicans did the last two years. Won't happen. They will see the writing on the wall from this election, vote WITH Republicans in the Senate on several occasions in the next two years, overcoming any Obama veto. ......White guilt has been cured almost enmass, conservative women and african-americans abound. Obama, at least for the Democrats future, is the WORST president possible, enjoy.
As I always sat, "White guilt" is the dark matter of white supremacist cosmology. Nobody can quantify or identify it, but supposedly it holds the whole universe together. Me? I'm sticking with phlogiston.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 16:15:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'P')ersonally, I'm looking forward to telling each of my neighbors that "repealing Obamacare" will mean that each of them will be called upon to sacrafice the life of a child on the altar of ideological purity, since any of their children that has asthma, autism, dyslexia, allergies, or anything else will never get medical insurance.

In coming years we will have to abandon a concept of medical insurance and begin to pay medical bills out of our own pocket.
This will drive prices down for sure.

All of that due to economic necessity, not ideological purity.

NB.
In my country (Poland) there is a public health scheme, compulsory for all employed.
Those who are not employed may enroll for free.
I am such a person.
I do not have job (as I don't need one) so I could enroll for free but I don't do it.
One can ask why as it sounds crazy.
Well, if I enrolled to state insurance, it would be illegal for hospital to charge me for a treatment but I would have to wait in long cue for said treatment and there are also annual funding quotas.
Towards the end of year hospitals are running out of funds to run some treatments and many desperately ill patients, including some cancer patients, have to wait until next year to get a treatment, even if hospital has free beds.
Sometimes it is a death cert for such patients.
And yet if they want to pay for such treatment, they are not allowed to because it is illegal to charge someone state-insured.
So it is an advantage for me not to be insured.
I have enough money to pay for whatever, save a hart transplant or something similar perhaps.
Now *if* I get ill, I will be allowed to pay (because I am not state insured).
This means that I will receive a prompt treatment at any time of the year and I can also skip all waiting lists - these are not applicable for those who pay out of their pockets.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Mesuge » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 18:34:14

Guys, are you for real, do you mean it that Obama is a progressive Democrat?
Since when? His precareer years in "deep" establishment thinktanks and fake community leadership bio? The voting for the wars, toiletpaperization of constitution, or perhaps since extending the Bush wars and sucking up to the junta?

Or did you just hear it on the network-ed TV?

This is getting crazy :lol:
I guess this planet is really pregnant for a change, what about try it for next couple of hundred mil years with different primates on the top of the food chain or rather any other species. The humans seem utterly beyond self-repair each day. :mrgreen:
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

24 of lost seats were ConservaDems

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Wed 03 Nov 2010, 21:52:42

It appears that much of the change in seats had to do with trading out ConservaDems for actual Republicans.

No big loss.

Democrats keep the Senate, so net result is more of the same.
Last edited by Cid_Yama on Wed 03 Nov 2010, 22:33:40, edited 2 times in total.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: 24 of lost seats were ConservaDems

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 03 Nov 2010, 21:56:25

If they voted for the Iraq war, they should be out, don't you agree?
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 24 of lost seats were ConservaDems

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Wed 03 Nov 2010, 22:04:06

That would decimate the Republicans, besides that vote was based on the Bush Administration's lies about WMD.

We at Peak Oil are well aware of why we are really there. That being, to ensure our supply of dwindling reserves.

It's not a nice world out there. And it will get worse in a world of declining resources.

It's no place for the simple minded.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: 24 of lost seats were ConservaDems

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 03 Nov 2010, 22:11:11

The Republicans should be out. The Dems were duped by GW? You are in favor of the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan? Let's have some intellectual honesty.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 24 of lost seats were ConservaDems

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Wed 03 Nov 2010, 22:21:27

1. Global Warming is real and the situation far worse than the general population knows.

2. I'm a realist. I know what will be done under the circumstances that prevail.

We all would prefer to live in a different world, but this is the one we have, and to pretend it is anything other than what it is, is detrimental to long term survival.

Like I said, no place for the simple minded.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest