Page added on April 7, 2011
The UN predicts that we will reach 9.1 billion in 2050, then the peak will occur around 2070 at 9.4 billion. But it is so far ahead and the margin of uncertainty is huge. We could easily end up with 1 or 2 billion more, or less.
NBF predicts a higher population because of better than expected life extension and pro-population growth policies in Europe and Asia and slower fertility declines in Africa. Prediction 11.5 billion by 2100. No peak in 2050.
Reasons for higher population
The UN assumes fertility in Africa, for example, will decline steadily from current levels of around four to five children, to around two. It might well go slower than that. Kenya, for example, had a fertility rate of nearly 8 in the 1960s, which came down to around 5 in the 1990s and has remained at that level. This was not expected by the UN, which expects things to go down steadily.
Governments in countries with very low birth rates are now considering implementing pro-natal policies. Most governments in Europe, I think, would like to see their birth rates go up a little bit. If that happens, there will be more Europeans, Japanese and Russians. Also, people might live longer than the UN predicts. The UN assumes that future increases in life expectancy will be slower than in the past. That may be wrong.
HIV is an example of a disease that people thought would stop growth or reduce Africa’s population. That didn’t happen. Population growth has such a powerful momentum even such a lethal and massive epidemic had only a fairly modest impact.
There are very few things that you can predict with any degree of accuracy 40 years from now. But the UN has a good record. In a projection made in 1950 it came close to predicting the actual 2000 population, so I would bet on there being a little over 9 billion people by 2050. Even so, the margin is still plus or minus a billion at least.
2 Comments on "World population could peak at 11 billion instead of 9.4 billion"
Sid Davis on Thu, 7th Apr 2011 11:19 am
So, what are these hungry mouths going to eat, Soylent Green? Are the people making this prediction certified as sane? Doubtful; no, not doubtful, but clearly not.
EDpeak on Fri, 8th Apr 2011 7:50 am
Don’t spend too much time on predicting; spend time on education, sex education, contraception, health care, literacy for all, in particular for women, and a social safety net (so people don’t resort as much to using ‘have many kids so they can take care of me when I’m old’ as much.
Count on certain political forces to fight against ALL of these things: against contraception, against access to health-care for the poor (they prefer for-profit health care), against literacy programs for the poor, etc, then they turn around and damn those “bad, bad poor people” for the population increasing.
We’ve made good progress slowing down the rate of increase, let’s continue