Forget about peak oil—we should be worrying about peak water: Groundwater basins that supply 2 billion people are being rapidly depleted, according to a new study. Worse: No one knows how long those reserves will last.
A research team led by scientists at the University of California, Irvine, examined the world’s 37 largest aquifers between 2003 and 2013 and found that one-third of them were “stressed,” meaning more water was being removed than replenished, according to one of two studies published Tuesday in the journal Water Resources Research.
The eight worst-off aquifers, labeled “overstressed,” had virtually no natural replenishment to offset human consumption.
The scientists determined the Northwest Sahara Aquifer System, which supplies water to 60 million people, to be the most overstressed. The Indus Basin aquifer of northwestern India and Pakistan is the second-most overstressed, followed by the Murzuk-Djado Basin in northern Africa. California’s Central Valley is “suffering rapid depletion” and was classified as highly stressed, according to the study.
The findings are alarming, especially as humans increasingly pump groundwater during times of drought.
So, Why You Should Care? As lakes and rivers diminish owing to climate change, aquifers become “an increasingly important water supply source globally,” the study said. “Understanding the amount of groundwater used versus the volume available is crucial to evaluate future water availability.”
The authors analyzed data from two NASA satellites that detect dips and bumps in the earth’s gravity, which is affected by the weight of groundwater.
Even that state-of-the-art technology cannot determine how much water remains beneath the surface.
There is a severe shortage of data on global groundwater availability, making it almost impossible to estimate how long an aquifer will last given its current rate of depletion and replenishment, scientists concluded in the second study.
The researchers found wildly ranging projections for “time to depletion.”
“Available physical and chemical measurements are simply insufficient,” study author Jay Famiglietti, a UCI professor who is also the senior water scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said in a statement. “Given how quickly we are consuming the world’s groundwater reserves, we need a coordinated global effort to determine how much is left.”
If underground water is so important to human survival, why the knowledge gap?
“It is expensive and time consuming to study groundwater,” Alexandra Richey, a study coauthor and a UCI doctoral student in civil engineering, said in an email.
That’s because researchers must drill deep beneath the surface to test aquifer levels, which can vary from place to place, depending on how much pore space there is in the soil, among other factors.
“As a result, many measurements need to be taken across the whole aquifer area instead of just being able to look at the level of a lake or reservoir,” Richey said.
Even so, she added, such painstaking research will be critical for the world to manage whatever groundwater resources it has left.
“[It] is not going to happen overnight,” Richey said. “It will be a long, coordinated project that ideally will connect researchers and decision makers to build the science into management plans.”
The city of Irvine, California, for example, has extensively studied its aquifer. “They know how low they can let the aquifer go before needing to either stop pumping or to supplement supply,” Richey said. “There’s a paper that says basically you can’t manage what you don’t know and right now we aren’t really managing groundwater well, if at all.”
Lance Larsen, a science center fellow at the Natural Resources Defense Council, said that it’s critical to monitor whatever groundwater is left.
“These studies clearly demonstrate that there are significant issues with groundwater management in the U.S. and we think more can be done to protect this limited resource,” Larsen said in an email. “Protecting groundwater supplies is a key piece to the puzzle of ensuring that future generations have access to fresh water.”
“When these aquifers dry up,” he said, “they are gone forever.”


GregT on Wed, 17th Jun 2015 10:02 pm
Up here in the Pacific Northwest, we rely on snowpack and glacial runoff. The snowpack in many areas is close to zero, and the glaciers are melting at alarming rates. Yet we continue to burn fossil fuels and continue to increase CO2 production. Human beings are our own worst enemies.
Makati1 on Wed, 17th Jun 2015 11:11 pm
What surface water is left will be polluted by all the chemicals of industry, in many countries, including North America. The aquifers will be gone soon, forever. Sub-surface water is being destroyed by fraking and farm chemicals.
It will not matter what fuel your rusting vehicle used … or how you survive the changes you added to. Mother Nature won’t even notice your demise or the end of humanity. She is already preparing the next ecosystem to take over, and homo sapiens will not be part of it.
Apneaman on Wed, 17th Jun 2015 11:21 pm
Fossil Fuels Drive Rapid Glacier Loss across Western Canada, Study Finds
http://thetyee.ca/News/2015/04/08/Fossil-Fuels-Glacier-Loss/
Hubbert on Thu, 18th Jun 2015 1:41 am
Expect mass starvation. We’re almost done.
Davy on Thu, 18th Jun 2015 7:34 am
Hub, it is a little more nuanced than that. We are trying to determine time frame with degree and duration of a coming rebalance of consumption and population of a complex interconnected world of delocalized locals connected together by a global system. We know ugly is ahead but should we crow fire in a crowded movie theater? You are right Hub, food and water is the key ingredient to this equation. Energy and the economy will be the match and the accelerant that will leave us hungry, thirsty, and many likely on the move.
The most important issue now is mitigation and adaptation of a global people. This may happen if a profound crisis hits that refocuses attention towards mitigation and adaptation. Once in a crisis the powers to be will be wrong footed. This crisis will not end because it is the end game of a growth based system and the birth of postindustrial man. Once in crisis the powers to be will be going from one crisis to another unable to even consider irrational growth polices at some point. Can you imagine a politician recommending a new football stadium when hunger is widespread? No.
I am worried about the threat of global war both conventional and NUK. I am worried about a mass exodus from large cities and the loss of control of industrial man’s machines and compounds. I feel there is no other path but ugly, painful, and decay. It is the time frame that interest me. It is the degree and duration of this descent that is the most important issues. A species survival in a bottleneck die off is predicated on degree and duration of the descent of consumption and population.
We are still functioning as a global system we are not yet doomed. Now is the time to take the top sails down and batten the hatches for the shit storm that is due soon. The clouds are on the horizon and the surfs up. All the warning signs are there. We need to discredit the hardcore cornucopians preaching a message of all is well don’t worry. All is not well and the longer we pretend and extend the worse the drop.
Should we be building and consuming in a business as usual fashion or investing in whatever sustainability and resilience that is left. Ideally we need at least half the population back to the land replacing as many monocultures as we can. That is what we are up against Hub. Crowing fire when there is none yet just makes us look nutter. We are nutter because nutters refuse to adapt to an insane system with no future but let us be balanced nutters not wolf crying nutters.
BobInget on Thu, 18th Jun 2015 9:44 am
*Fifty four million and counting.
*Number of climate and oil war refugees knocking about the world looking for food and minimal shelter.
The figure marked a rise of 8.3 million persons over the previous year, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said in new data as it released its annual ‘Global Trends Report: World at War’.
India as a country of origin had 10,433 refugees and 16,709 asylum seekers with pending cases in 2014; and 1,99,937 refugees and 5,074 pending cases of asylum seekers as country of asylum for the same year. Globally, one in every 122 humans is now either a refugee, internally displaced, or seeking asylum. If this were the population of a country, it would be the world’s 24th biggest, the report said.Every day last year on average 42,500 people became refugees, asylum seekers, or internally displaced, a four-fold increase in just four years.
Of the 59.5 million people forcibly displaced worldwide as a result of persecution, conflict, generalized violence, or human rights violations by last year end, 19.5 million were refugees, 38.2 million were internally displaced persons (IDPs) and 1.8 million were asylum-seekers.Of these 19.5 million refugees, around 5.1 million are Palestinians while Syrians, Somalis and Afghans made for more than half the remaining 14.4 million refugees, UNHCR said.
And if that was not disturbing enough – over half the world’s refugees are children. Worldwide displacement was at the highest level ever recorded, it said, adding that the number of people forcibly displaced at the end of 2014 had risen to a staggering 59.5 million compared to 51.2 million a year earlier and 37.5 million a decade ago. The increase represents the biggest leap ever seen in a single year.
Moreover, the report said the situation was likely to worsen still further.”We are witnessing a paradigm change, an unchecked slide into an era in which the scale of global forced displacement as well as the response required is now clearly dwarfing anything seen before,” said UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres in a statement.
The largest source country for refugees last year was Syria (3.88 million) followed by Afghanistan (2.59 million),and Somalia (1.11 million). The three countries made for 53 per cent of refugees worldwide.
Apneaman on Thu, 18th Jun 2015 3:03 pm
Pacific Apocalypse: The Great Dying Continues
http://www.dailyimpact.net/2015/06/18/pacific-apocalypse-the-great-dying-continues/
Hot Pacific Ocean Runs Bloody — Blob Now Features Record Red Tide
https://robertscribbler.wordpress.com/2015/06/17/hot-pacific-ocean-runs-bloody-blob-now-features-record-red-tide/
Makati1 on Thu, 18th Jun 2015 8:11 pm
BobInget, consider that the three countries you mentioned happen to be countries under siege by the Empire. They may have water problems, but I would bet most are leaving to get away from the killing. How many are leaving the Ukraine to get to safety in Russia? How about Iraq or Yemen?
Kenz300 on Fri, 19th Jun 2015 10:28 am
Yet the world adds 80 million more people to provide water for every year…………
Endless population growth is not sustainable…..
Kenz300 on Sat, 20th Jun 2015 8:37 am
Too many people and too few resources…… something has got to give
Birth Control Permanent Methods: Learn About Effectiveness
http://www.emedicinehealth.com/birth_control_permanent_methods/article_em.htm