Page added on May 9, 2012
The recent UN alert that drought in the Sahel threatens 15 million lives is a harbinger of things to come.
In the next twenty years, global demand for fresh water will vastly outstrip reliable supply in many parts of the world. Thanks to population growth and agricultural intensification, humanity is drawing more heavily than ever on shared river basins and underground aquifers. Meanwhile, global warming is projected to exacerbate shortages in already water-stressed regions, even as it accelerates the rapid melting of glaciers and snow cover upon which a billion people depend for their ultimate source of water.
This sobering message emerges from the first U.S. Intelligence Community Assessment of Global Water Security. The document predicts that by 2030 humanity’s “annual global water requirements” will exceed “current sustainable water supplies” by forty percent. Absent major policy interventions, water insecurity will generate widespread social and political instability and could even contribute to state failure in regions important to U.S. national security. (Look here for a webcast from the Woodrow Wilson Center of experts and U.S. government officials discussing the findings.)
The simultaneous ubiquity and scarcity of water is one of Earth’s little ironies. Globally, 97.5 percent of H2O is contained in world’s oceans. Of the planet’s “fresh” water (the residual 2.5%), more than two-thirds is encased in ice packs and glaciers, particularly in Antarctica and Greenland, another thirty percent in groundwater, and almost one percent in high latitude permafrost. That leaves us with about 0.4 percent of global fresh water to account for: about two-thirds of that is contained in freshwater lakes, with the rest distributed among soil moisture (12 percent), the atmosphere (9.5 percent), wetlands (8.5 percent), rivers (1.5 percent) and vegetation (1 percent).
The need for reliable sources of fresh water is as old as our species, of course. What is new today is the combustible combination of surging global demand for increasingly scarce fresh water in certain volatile regions of poor governance. Several factors are driving this trend.
Significantly, the intelligence community does not predict that increased competition for water resources will, by itself, be a source of violent conflict—a finding borne out by a rich body of research. And yet the same document warns that water stress may well “contribute to the risk of instability and state failure,” particularly “when combined with poverty, social tensions, environmental degradation, ineffectual leadership, and weak political institutions.” The accompanying map makes clear that many of the countries likely to be hardest hit are fragile and/or authoritarian states located within the broad arc of instability encompassing North Africa, the Horn, the Arabian Peninsula, and southwest, central, and south Asia. In other words, states least able to cope.
Regional tensions over shared river basins will also rise. States will use diplomatic and other leverage to preserve their water interests, and “upstream” states will be tempted to use water as a diplomatic weapon, including by threatening to impede flow. Nonstate actors, notably terrorists and other extremists, may also seek to sabotage dams and other infrastructure.
Regional stability and peace, therefore, increasingly depend on effective management of the world’s 263 shared international water basins. “Today, water basin agreements often do not exist or are inadequate.” Analyzing the current capacity to manage seven major water basins, Global Water Security assesses mechanisms to govern the Brahmaputra and Amu Darya to be “inadequate,” and those governing the Tigris-Euphrates, the Nile, and the Mekong as “limited.” (The Indus and the Jordan rivers earn a higher, “moderate” score.)
By revealing the scale and consequences of global water crisis, the intelligence community has performed a great service. But the policy response to date has been just a drop in the bucket.
5 Comments on "Not a Drop to Drink: The Global Water Crisis"
Siddhartha on Wed, 9th May 2012 12:39 pm
More hysterical globalist alarmist BS – here’s a counterpoint:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-17775211
BillT on Wed, 9th May 2012 2:28 pm
BBC is NOT a reliable source of information. Not even close. Rivers are no longer going all the way to the oceans. Huge reservoirs are going down steadily. Aquifers are also dropping and will not come back. The water wars are already beginning in areas of California and the limit of water available is curtailing the development of tar sands in Canada.
With climates shifting, large areas of the world are going in to drought conditions. As temperatures rise, more and more areas will become deserts. It will be felt most in areas like India and the Middle East. China’s deserts are growing as are those in Africa. We have just begun to feel the effects of water shortages.
Kenz300 on Wed, 9th May 2012 3:55 pm
Quote — ” Thanks to population growth and agricultural intensification, humanity is drawing more heavily than ever on shared river basins and underground aquifers. Meanwhile, global warming is projected to exacerbate shortages in already water-stressed regions, even as it accelerates the rapid melting of glaciers and snow cover upon which a billion people depend for their ultimate source of water.”
———————-
Over population is the the elephant in the room. Too many people and too few resources. Access to family planning services needs to be available to all that want it.
Johan on Thu, 10th May 2012 4:31 am
@ Siddhartha – Globalist alarmist BS? What level of idiot are you? Sure we can just continue to to grow and use resources at the rate we are doing now. They are infinite right? Even if the BBC report is correct, it does not mean our resources will last forever and why should we use everything until it finally runs out. To add to that, we are frackting the hell out of everything and polluting the water we have left. Your point is weak to say the least. There are too many people on the planet, end of story.
Rollin on Sun, 13th May 2012 4:45 am
I totally agree with Johan on the fracking problem. But let’s look at the human usage problem. One medium sized river provides enough fresh drinking water for the world population with some left over. One medium sized river. So what is the water problem? Industry and agriculture use horrendous amounts of fresh water.
Also areas that have been going further into desertification are still trying to be used as human habitat. Rule one: If there is not enough water in an area, find another area to live. Deserts last for a long, long time. It may be millenia before these regions come back. They certainly cannot sustain a large population without huge external inputs and all that entails.
It basically boils down to industrial/agricultural use and the hard fact that some areas of the earth are not really suitable for human life. If the canals and aquifers feeding Phoenix were to dry up or dramatically slow down, how long do you think people would stay there? How long would they stay if the electric power stopped in the summer? External inputs.