Nine Strategies to Stop Short of Nine Billion
Although most analysts assume that the world’s population will rise from today’s seven billion to nine billion by 2050, it is quite possible that humanity will never reach this population size.
My chapter in this year’s State of the World 2012: Moving Toward Sustainable Prosperity, “Nine Population Strategies to Stop Short of 9 Billion,” outlines a series of strategies that would prompt significant declines in birth rates. Based purely on the intention of women around the world to have small families or no children at all, these initiatives, policies, and changes in attitude could end population growth before mid-century at fewer than nine billion people.
Examples from around the world demonstrate effective policies that not only reduce birth rates, but also respect the reproductive aspirations of parents and support an educated and economically active society that promotes the health of women and girls. Most of these reproduction policies are relatively inexpensive to implement, yet in many places they are opposed on the basis of cultural resistance and political infeasibility.
In creating this list, I sought to eschew the language and approaches of “population control” or the idea that anyone should pressure women and their partner on reproduction. Instead, I hoped to highlight strategies that could put human population on an environmentally sustainable path:
- Provide universal access to safe and effective contraceptive options for both sexes. With two in five pregnancies reported as mistimed or never wanted, lack of access to good family planning services is among the biggest gaps in assuring that each baby will be wanted and welcomed in advance by its parents.
- Guarantee education through secondary school for all, especially girls. In every culture surveyed to date, women who have completed at least some secondary school have fewer children on average, and have children later in life, than do women who have less education.
- Eradicate gender bias from law, economic opportunity, health, and culture. Women who can own, inherit, and manage property; divorce; obtain credit; and participate in civic and political affairs on equal terms with men are more likely to postpone childbearing and to have fewer children compared to women who are deprived of these rights.
- Offer age-appropriate sexuality education for all students. Data from the United States indicates that exposure to comprehensive programs that detail puberty, intercourse, options of abstinence and birth control, and respecting the sexual rights and decisions of individuals can help prevent unwanted pregnancies and hence reduce birth rates.
- End all policies that reward parents financially based on the number of children they have. Governments can preserve and even increase tax and other financial benefits aimed at helping parents by linking these not to the number of children they have, but to parenthood status itself.
- Integrate lessons on population, environment, and development into school curricula at multiple levels. Refraining from advocacy or propaganda, schools should educate students to make well-informed choices about the impacts of their behavior, including childbearing, on the environment.
- Put prices on environmental costs and impacts. In quantifying the cost of an additional family member by calculating taxes and increased food costs, couples may decide that the cost of having an additional child is too high. Such decisions, freely made by women and couples, can decrease birth rates without any involvement by non-parents in reproduction.
- Adjust to an aging population instead of boosting childbearing through government incentives and programs. Population aging must be met with the needed societal adjustments, such as increased labor participation, rather than by offering incentives to women to have more children.
- Convince leaders to commit to stabilizing population through the exercise of human rights and human development. By educating themselves on rights-based population policies, policymakers can ethically and effectively address population-related challenges by empowering women to make their own reproductive choices.
If most or all of these strategies were put into effect, global population likely would peak and subsequently begin a gradual decline before 2050, thereby ensuring sustainable development of natural resources and global stability into the future. By implementing policies that defend human rights, promote education, and reflect the true economic and environmental costs of childbearing, the world can halt population short of the nine billion that so many analysts expect.
newsecuritybeat.org
Kenz300 on Mon, 16th Jul 2012 3:20 pm
Every problem is made harder to solve with the worlds ever growing population. There are over a billion people living on less than $1 a day.
Food crisis, water crisis, fish stock crisis, financial crisis, jobs crisis, energy crisis, climate change crisis……..
BillT on Mon, 16th Jul 2012 3:46 pm
All of the above suggestions will not happen. Why? Many reasons, but human nature is the big one.
When the largest religion encourages large families by blocking any birth control or family planing (Catholics), no changes are going to happen.
Most of the world does not even educate at grade school levels. Forget secondary school.
Culture is NOT going to change over a few years…not when it has existed for hundreds, maybe thousands of years and is a way of life for billions.
Sex education? You are joking right? We cannot even teach biology in public schools. Why do you think they will teach kids how to use condoms and other preventive methods?
Etc…no change…Mather Nature is going to do it for us, and I doubt we will even exceed 8 billion.
dsula on Mon, 16th Jul 2012 6:06 pm
BillT: Rag-heads are the largest religion, not catholics. Breeding and bombing are the only thing they are good at. They should bomb each other more, so it compensates for the breeding.
DC on Mon, 16th Jul 2012 8:10 pm
Hey dsula, when I was in HS, there were 240million amerikans, now a few decades later, there are 310million of you, and no sign of a slow down. You breed like rabbits down there too. Or go back a little further, since WW2, the # of amerikans has doubled, one generation. Think ‘ragheads’ are the only ones with a problem? O yea, and amerikans shoot each other a pretty good clip as well, but it hasnt done much to slow down there numbers has it?
Think again…
As for the article, yea more fluff. The one idea easist to implement is this one
End all policies that reward parents financially based on the number of children they have.
Ending so called ‘baby bonuses’ would be a big help, though by itself, it wont be near enough..but…tuff issue anyway look at it…
Kenz300 on Mon, 16th Jul 2012 9:32 pm
Over population makes every problem worse and harder to solve. Ending population growth will contribute to solving those problems. Access to family planning services needs to be available to all that want it. Most people are smart enough to realize that if they can not provide for themselves they can not provide for a child and will use family planning services if given an opportunity.
BillT on Tue, 17th Jul 2012 4:13 am
dsula, if you add up the killings per year, the US of A would win hands down. There are over 40,000 murders in the US alone per year. Throw in the auto ‘accidents’from drunks and drugs and you double that number. That does not even count the murders done in the name of ‘freedom from terrorists’. Americans hold the record for killings over the last 100 years. Muslims get maybe a few thousand per year across the globe.
christian phillip on Tue, 17th Jul 2012 4:09 pm
welcome to the tenth commandment…cannibalisma…hehehehe