The nuclear disaster has contaminated the world’s largest ocean in only five years and it’s still leaking 300 tons of radioactive waste every day.
Credit – NOAA
What was the most dangerous nuclear disaster in world history? Most people would say the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in Ukraine, but they’d be wrong. In 2011, an earthquake, believed to be an aftershock of the 2010 earthquake in Chile, created a tsunami that caused a meltdown at the TEPCO nuclear power plant in Fukushima, Japan. Three nuclear reactors melted down and what happened next was the largest release of radiation into the water in the history of the world. Over the next three months, radioactive chemicals, some in even greater quantities than Chernobyl, leaked into the Pacific Ocean. However, the numbers may actually be much higher as Japanese official estimates have been proven by several scientists to be flawed in recent years.
Radioactive Debris from Fukushima approaching North America’s western coast Credit – RT
If that weren’t bad enough, Fukushima continues to leak an astounding 300 tons of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean every day. It will continue do so indefinitely as the source of the leak cannot be sealed as it is inaccessible to both humans and robots due to extremely high temperatures.
It should come as no surprise, then, that Fukushima has contaminated the entire Pacific Ocean in just five years. This could easily be the worst environmental disaster in human history and it is almost never talked about by politicians, establishment scientists, or the news. It is interesting to note that TEPCO is a subsidiary of General Electric (also known as GE), one of the largest companies in the world, which has considerable control over numerous news corporations and politicians alike. Could this possibly explain the lack of news coverage Fukushima has received in the last five years? There is also evidence that GE knew about the poor condition of the Fukushima reactors for decades and did nothing. This led 1,400 Japanese citizens to sue GE for their role in the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
Even if we can’t see the radiation itself, some parts of North America’s western coast have been feeling the effects for years. Not long after Fukushima, fish in Canada began bleeding from their gills, mouths, and eyeballs. This “disease” has been ignored by the government and has decimated native fish populations, including the North Pacific herring. Elsewhere in Western Canada, independent scientists have measured a 300% increase in the level of radiation. According to them, the amount of radiation in the Pacific Ocean is increasing every year. Why is this being ignored by the mainstream media? It might have something to do with the fact that the US and Canadian governments have banned their citizens from talking about Fukushima so “people don’t panic.”
Credit – AP
Further south in Oregon, USA, starfish began losing legs and then disintegrating entirely when Fukushima radiation arrived there in 2013. Now, they are dying in record amounts, putting the entire oceanic ecosystem in that area at risk. However, government officials say Fukushima is not to blame even though radiation in Oregon tuna tripled after Fukushima. In 2014, radiation on California beaches increased by 500 percent. In response, government officials said that the radiation was coming from a mysterious “unknown” source and was nothing to worry about.
However, Fukushima is having a bigger impact than just the West coast of North America. Scientists are now saying that the Pacific Ocean is already radioactive and is currently at least 5-10 times more radioactive than when the US government dropped numerous nuclear bombs in the Pacific during and after World War II. If we don’t start talking about Fukushima soon, we could all be in for a very unpleasant surprise.
Suspicious on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 10:46 pm
Anyone find it suspicious that this article is presented by a company called ‘Peak Oil’? Seems a little fishy, or should I say oily to me. Perhaps trying to scare people away from other energy sources so as to sell, oh I dont know, maybe oil? Kind of like the tobacco companies stating that their research on tobacco use is safe.
Chris S on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 10:55 pm
There is a reason that the major news sites don’t run this story, it is complete and utter nonsense. 300 tons per day for 5 years is 300x365x5 = 547,500 tons of Nuclear waste. A quick trip to the nuclear energy institute website (nei.org) and we find this:
“Over the past four decades, the entire industry has produced 76,430 metric tons of used nuclear fuel”.
No research at all, just scare tactics to try and scare the people into believing a disaster is impending.
falisrm on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:01 pm
This article is such a scam. wikipedia has way better info than this article. I am a radiological worker on usa carriers and go inside the reactors everyday and the exposures are so low at fukushima, unless you are swimming in the pools at the plant. You get more radiation standing at the beach all day then the effects of fukushima. You get more radiation from eating a banana than fukushima. People are obsessed with disasters, it’s nearly impossible to talk people out of one.
Chris B on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:02 pm
This article and story is so stupid. I was intrigued by the colorful and scary “radiation” photo. Based on the fact that the image came NOAA Tsunami Research and shows the wave heights of the tsunami, I am guessing the rest of this article is bogus as well.
ACTUAL NOAA IMAGE HERE:
http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/honshu20110311/index.html
Stabilizer on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:05 pm
The simple way to eliminate nuclear accidents is quit being Socialist about nuclear power. Have the nuclear plants buy insurance on the open market instead of forcing the taxpayers to pay for accidents. No other power plant in existence allows the owners to retain all profits while UNASSOCIATED TAXPAYERS pick all costs for fuel, insurance, clean up, and disposal.
Imagine if the US Government told the taxpayers they had to pick up the bill for BP’s Macondo Oil Spill.
JC on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:06 pm
It was well known that US government help Japanese government covered up this radiation waste been dump into the ocean.
El Gato on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:09 pm
Let’s wait another five years, looking at deformities, and illness to beach goers,maybe we will say there’s a problem with the water in the ocean, which will affect the fish we eat. DAH!
GE….enough said.
J.R.WILLIS on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:10 pm
Fukushima Radiation Has Contaminated The Entire Pacific Ocean (And It’s Going To Get Worse) | Peak Oil News and Message Boards. 10-3-2016
WAKE UP HEBREWS AND FLEE THAT WICKED CITY:
REVELATION 8:9
And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed.
REVELATION 8:8
And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood;
REVELATION 8:11
And the name of the star is called Wormwood: and the third part of the waters became wormwood; and many men died of the waters, because they were made bitter.
REVELATION 16:3
The second angel poured out his bowl on the sea, and it turned into blood like that of a dead person, and every living thing in the sea died.
The Mediterranean ocean will be the living waters to sustain life within them in these End-Times. Wake up God’s people and flee that wicked nation Babylon the great before it’s too late.
J.R.Willis
Author: A RACE OF DEMONS REFINED 2017
Author: SPIRITUAL CRIMES
http://peakoil.com/…/fukushima-radiation-has-contaminated-t…
https://www.yahoo.com/…/a74…/ss_fukushima-radiation-has.html
curlyq3 on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:17 pm
Howdy flatsum, when radioactive isotopes for example such as cesium-137, strontium-90, or uranium-235 have entered the environment do to the loss of their protective containment, they can then find there way into the food chain. These radioactive isotopes become serious threats when they are ingested into living organisms. These ingested elements then become what is referred to as internal emitters. They are absorbed into the tissues of the organism and due to the proximity of the decaying particles to the tissue they are absorbed into they will then due damage to that tissue. Bio-accumulation of these radioactive particles occurs when one organism ingests the contaminated organism. It will then proceed up the food chain to what ever the highest level that ingests these contaminated organisms until eventually the food chain collapses due to the destructive nature of the radioactive damage that is occurring as long as whatever the particular decay rate of the ingested isotope may be. The bad thing about nuclear is the length of time it can be dangerous to all carbon based life. The nuclear profiteers and their apologists spend a lot of money and time explaining how safe this stuff is as long as it is kept in protective containment. What is happening more and more and likely to continue is that it is escaping containment and entering the biosphere. Once out of containment it is difficult if not impossible to be recovered. I hope I have helped you to understand that you do not want this material to get inside of you!
curlyq3
El Gato on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:19 pm
I sure ain’t eating sashimi any more, nor salmon from the Pacific.
curlyq3 on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:43 pm
Ooops, I misspelled your login name flatusm ! Are you an old “fart” (flatus) like myself ?
curlyq3
genton on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:53 pm
it seems cape Horn to be an unsurpassable frontier for the radiations as they stop abruptly.
Sufficient to say this graphic is a hoax, a fake or a joke!
Peter Mortensen on Sun, 2nd Oct 2016 11:53 pm
This article is utterly silly.
Fukushima is surely a very serious issue but you can be 100% sure that fossil fuels are causing a lot more harm than this accident. Coal power plants are emitting enormous amounts of toxins including mercury that gets into the food chain. Nowadays we have to be careful what fish we eat not so much because of Fukushima but far more because of other sources of pollution including mercury.
This article would have been more credible had it included actual information of science studies with proper measurements of radioactive isotope contamination.
I just read this news also:
In the half decade since a nuclear power plant in Fukushima, Japan, melted down, scientists have found no levels of nuclear radiation along the California coast that would be harmful to humans.
Kai Vetter, a UC Berkeley professor of nuclear engineering, assembled a team of students and colleagues soon after a 9.0 earthquake and tsunami five years ago Friday heavily damaged the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station on Japan’s Pacific coast, allowing radiation to seep into the atmosphere. Their mission was to test for the presence of harmful radiation that might find its way to California.
“When it became clear that there were major releases of radiation there, we became very serious about what the effects could be here,” Vetter said. “We started to set up tools and instruments here to see the radiation coming across the Pacific.”
Over time, his team found nothing alarming, Vetter said.
“Most people who make cross-country flights choose to be exposed to a larger amount of radiation than what they’d be exposed to from Fukushima’s effects here,” he said.
GregT on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 12:30 am
Good comment curlyq3,
There are also the effects of ionizing radiation on DNA.
https://www.google.ca/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=mevxV52cNKfz8wefv6ngDg&gws_rd=ssl#q=radiation+and+dna
We never should have screwed around with something that we do not fully understand.
Sadly, one more genie that we’ve let out of the bottle that cannot be put back in again.
makati1 on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 12:32 am
After reading the prognostication of ALL the math wizards above, I cna understand why ignorance is the common disease in America.
Radiation is CUMULATIVE. Plankton eat diatoms. Sardines eat plankton. Sardines are eaten by salmon. Salmon are eaten by humans. This is an addition problem, not a multiplication problem. Simplified as there are many other in-between consumers of the radioactivity.
How much is too much? Answer: One particle is all it takes to damage a cell and cause cancer. One particle. Just like one bullet can kill you.
Ignorance is rife in the world today. The human species deserves to go extinct and soon.
Paul Boutsos on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 12:46 am
This is TOTALLY bogus – check it out at Snopes.
And to think that the idiots at Yahoo thought this was a “newsworthy” story!
Apneaman on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 12:48 am
Oh, Fukushima
A chart purportedly showing radioactive water seeping into the ocean from the Fukushima nuclear plant actually depicts something else.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/technology/fukushima.asp
me on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 12:49 am
I pretty sure that the starfish melting started before fukushima incident.
Jack Norman on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:02 am
Ok I’m reading some of these responses on this article. I cant believe how stupid these folks are. This is real!!!! This article isn’t talking about no tobacco or nuclear fuel or contain radiation. They are talking about the water they are pulling out of the Pacific. Yes they can’t control it. An we can’t do anything about it.
curlyq3 on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:23 am
Hello Peter M, I have studied the consequences of nuclear energy now since the Fukushima event first occurred. I have responded to a few posts regarding this article here on Peak Oil. I have not bothered to take the time to read this article. If I were to guess I would say it is just one of many controlled opposition productions that are released periodically to be easily refuted as to the accuracy of the information presented. There is never enough conversation regarding the inherent dangers of nuclear energy. By this I mean the way this material is a threat to all carbon base life. When it enters the biosphere it begins a destructive process to our food chain. As long as it can enter the food chain at any level it will bio-accumulate. It initially was my fear that it would reach the west coast and I would ingest these radioisotopes when I was out surfing. It became clear to me after studying the physics involved with these heavy elements that that would be a low probability to exposure. What I emphasize to everyone is that exposure to radioactive material is dangerous in a cumulative nature. The nuclear profiteers and their apologists have always presented the danger of radiation as an external exposure scenario. And external exposures generally require high levels of radiation to be immediate health concerns. These type of exposures have occurred and are the headline stories. The real danger though is when these materials enter your body and do not pass through but are absorbed due to being analogues to common minerals that the body needs to function. This the reason you would want to consume iodine tablets if there was a threat of absorbing the radioactive iodine isotope. By taking the iodine you are trying to keep your body from absorbing the radioactive iodine by flooding your system with the safe and stable iodine. I have learned that human exposure is most likely going to be the result of a contaminated food chain. Wherever the food chain has been exposed that is where it will increase your odds of ingesting these materials. It would be very foolish to eat any plant or animal products that were taken from anywhere near The Fukushima catastrophe. The problem at Fukushima is they are not able to contain the contamination and it is slowly spreading and increasing the exposure to the food chain. You mention the dangers of burning fossil fuels. That is definitely the most immediate health concern facing Humanity. And if you have studied the topic of “peak oil”, you would understand that due to 300 years of easy and abundant energy, the human population has exploded exponentially. We have now exhausted the easy and abundant energy and will face a population collapse. I posted this link here just a few posts back but I will post again for you. It is the most informative website available regarding the Fukushima event.
http://www.fukuleaks.org/web/
curlyq3
Oo on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:24 am
Seeing as that map’s about recorded tide/sea levels and not radiation in conjunction with this site called “peakoil,” I’m gonna say this is some Big Oil propaganda fear tactic. Not even a good one at that. But, I won’t be surprised if Trump is tweeting this tomorrow.
Lisa on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:34 am
People, the Fukushima radiation disaster is the worst disaster in the history of the world known to us and you are seriously oblivious to this reality? Get your head out of the sand, put your cell phones down, stop watching TV and LOOK at the disaster all around you. Wake up!
To those who believe that this article is bogus and there is nothing to worry about:
I say either you have got your head stuck in the sand so you are not aware of the monstrosity of this issue or you were hired specifically to go on the internet to throw out more lies to confuse the issue and help cover up the truth. In fact, if you feel there is no danger and all this Fukushima radiation scare is bogus, put your money where your mouth is. You should spend more time on the beach and in the ocean. Show us how safe it is. Eat specifically Pacific ocean fish but hey, any ocean fish will do because the radiation has already made it in all bodies of water on Earth. Then do let us know how you are doing healthwise not just today but in 5, 10, 20 years. Remember, radiation is cummulative.
If you don’t work in the radiation field, please don’t make uneducated and ignorant public comments. Do some research and actually look into the topic. That would be the responsible thing to do.
naissogramc on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:37 am
All the corporations care about is profits. The Nuke industry should have been gone decades ago. Now we are facing aging nuke plants, no disposal of waste, and poorly planned siting near major population areas. When there is a problem who is going to suffer? You and I..How horrible.
Ray Depp on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:39 am
pure BS, all lies, the pictures represents wave heights, not radiation.
Just another liberal demoncrat trying to stop the advance of nuclear power. Maybe someone could make a picture of the height of phony ecologists to show us areas of hot atmosphere where to avoid.
Derek on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:41 am
This page is knowingly posting bullshit. That graph is of the estimated tsunami wve height as it spread across the ocean. And the most recent studies have shown that radiation levels in the pacific ocean are at or near what was normal before the incident..
Jay on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:42 am
Sorry guys, but this story seems bogus… you might have all caught wind of it from the very beginning… when the article states
“In 2011, an earthquake, believed to be an aftershock of the 2010 earthquake in Chile, created a tsunami …”
A 2010 earthquake in Chile then triggering the Great East Japan Earthquake close to months or a year later? Come on!
The Fukushima Daichi Disaster began occurring at 2:46 PM, with a 9.0 mag earthquake, “Great East Japan Earthquake”, with aftershocks (>7.0) lasting into April 11.
The earthquake then generated the tsunami which hit Fukushima beginning at 3:46 PM, with subsequent waves following (source: http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/fukushima-accident.aspx)
This article is just bait for the Nuclear purists and the oil companies
Jay on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:44 am
The source states Great East Japan Earthquake March 11, 2011, at 2:46 PM… months into 2011!
naissogramc on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:52 am
Dumb Ass. Move next door to a nuke plant thats 40 years old
John on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:53 am
It’s interesting how the pictures is used in such a way as to suggest the spread of radiation throughout the Pacific Ocean. Awesome way to drag the gullible to the article….because let’s face it, how many people will actually take a moment to find out that the picture has absolutely NOTHING to do with radiation …at all. F’n scammers.
naissogramc on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:56 am
Who do you believe.GE, the plant owners, regulators that do not do their job and ignorant local officials.
pacificman on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:58 am
http://nctr.pmel.noaa.gov/honshu20110311/honshu2011-globalmaxplot_ok.jpg
That picture is not radiation, it is Tsunami wave plotting from NOAA.
curlyq3 on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 1:59 am
Howdy to all you Peak Oil fans and good evening again from southern Utah. I thought that this article would be of interest in regards to this thread. Remember that nuclear energy is safe as long as the nuclear material can be contained. When it gets out of containment you are in serious trouble!
The nuclear profiteers and their apologists have made that message clear and they will be held accountable to that message.
http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/2988175/sizewell_b_and_27_other_edf_nuclear_plants_at_risk_of_catastrophic_failure.html
curlyq3
naissogramc on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:00 am
Yeah and we are all going to win the lottery.
Mari A Grige on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:00 am
check out independent satellite stations. How about Bigelow? They used to e rug manufactures, now they’re making pods. The 1% will escape,new won’t be on that shuttle.
Chris Alaska on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:03 am
I am a restaurant opoerator and I find it harder and hrder to get and the price has been rising faster than a speeding bullet, to the pont that my supliers are hoarding.
In the US, the effect of BP oil spill is not noticeable because Gulf Coast fishing fleet had been decimated years ago. fish are harder to find and near shores so boats have to go farther out.
Yesterday, one of my suppkliers told me to expect higher price increase in the coming months. His sup-liers had told him thatthe entire Pacific fleet returned to shore with alomost nothing.
to me, it may be bklessing iin disguise. I rather not servng seafoods for a while than to serve radio active fish to my customers.
naissogramc on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:08 am
Held accountable what does that mean.
curlyq3 on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:20 am
Howdy naissogramc, unfortunately I suspect it will involve angry mobs as in pitchforks and torches. When the wheels and doors fly off this clown car civilization, I will be glad that I live in a place that you likely could not find if I gave you a map and directions to get here! Good luck and I do wish you well.
curlyq3
anonymous droidbot on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:25 am
People who doubt the severity of the Fukushima radioactive contamination should consider the facts. Each of the 3 reactors at Fukushima are 3 times the size of the single reactor that exploded at Chernobyl. There were massive spent nuclear fuel fires at Fukushima Reactor 4. Fukushima reactor 3 used MOX plutonium enhanced fuels. The 3 molten reactor cores are STILL NOT CONTAINED! Nuclear fission continues on; out of control. The deadly cancer causing life killing fission products are washing unimpeded into the Pacific every second of every minute of every hour of every day since 3.11.11. The total volume of radioactive materials that have entered the ocean and atmosphere from Fukushima FAR EXCEEDS Chernobyl. Keep eating Pacific seafoods if you doubt these FACTS and perhaps we can study your tumor laden body for science in the future. Beware the pro nuclear shills everywhere in this comments section. They get paid to downplay the dangers of nuclear. The nuclear energy industry spent $1.4 BILLION on PR/Marketing in 2014 alone. There is no such thing as “nuclear safety.” Nuclear reactors are by definition extremely dangerous complex machines which operate in a barely in control manner under routine operations. Reactors use fission to split atoms. Reactors can, and will, explode like Fukushima reactor #3 and Chernobyl. Read ENENEWS.COM to learn the truth. Ban Reactors Forever.
Clean up the nuke cancer death wastes.
Death sentences for criminal nukers.
Gary on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:44 am
GOD Will Bring To Ruin Those Ruining The Earth !
Gary on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:47 am
The U.S. has over 100 reactors just like the ones in Fukushima !…Some are full of spent fuel rods in which they were not designed to store !
curlyq3 on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:49 am
Howdy anonymous droidbot, I was at Enenews almost from the beginning. My heart went out to the passionate and dedicated posters that were there posting links and presenting the truth about what nuclear energy is about. I have not been there in some time. My login at Enenews is $$ProfitOfDoom$$. I had to get away from the nuclear cabal as it is a manifestly evil business and the paid shills are relentless. Just being exposed to the nuclear news was wearing me out. I felt that there was a victory when San Onofre NPP was forced to close for the evil lying crap they pulled there messing with the steam generators. Take care and preserve yourself.
curlyq3
May on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 2:49 am
Chernobyl Belarus
shawn on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 3:03 am
Some people call the article bogus because the nuclear waste being leaked at 300 ton a day as claimed by the article amounts to more than the total nuclear waste from the N power plant of the world. —- Let me explain this to you: one part of pure nuclear waste maybe mixed into 10 parts or more of surrounding materials to create a larger amount of nuclear waste. So wake up, just one particle, which is <1/1,000,000 of 1 oz can cause cancer if it goes into your body.
tom Gripes on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 3:04 am
Hello ya’ll. I can’t be mean to fellow human beings. My heart has been broke about this disaster that has not been talked about on any news mainstream or not. I am proud to see Yahoo standing up to wake up humanity. There is nothing right about nuclear anything and the pacific is ruined. Sailors that have sailed across it for years report that everything is dead. They saw one whale with a big tumor on its back humping along. Nicola Tesla could pull electricity out of the thin air. Enough to power a car and your house. The big shots couldn’t figure out how to make money off of it back in 1930. There is no need for this nonsense. The FBI stole all his patents but we have electricity in our homes due to his invention of ac currant. I’ll continue to pray. Prayer is our best and only defense in this last age.
Riphly George on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 3:04 am
I was living in Japan at the time. All the buildings I owned 100 miles from Fukushima were seriously structurally damaged and had to be abandoned. The residents wisely wore masks to try to avoid contamination but it is everywhere on land east of Nagano. Most residents still say it is unwise to go out without a filter or to drive with the car windows down. The comments above about the quantity of radioactive material released, seeking to reduce or challenge the dire nature of the effects of this disaster, do not take into account the difference between normal controlled use of radioactive fuels and the wildly uncontrolled production of a meltdown times three. Those meltdowns will be active for eighty years and the current extreme domestic and worldwide contamination is just at it’s beginning. Deny it if you wish but I stopped eating produce from Japan immediately and don’t touch Pacific seafood on my life. Enjoy it if you have the ability to ignore this on-going ultra-disaster.
Tom jones on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 3:06 am
Cancer rates are higher along the coast, you cant find anyone that disagrees with that. If you believe were safe then go to fukushima and work. You can make a record $140 per hour. I think that speaks for itself. You know that money will go straight to the workers family, survival isnt expected.
JonH on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 3:21 am
Allright everyone, then you should have no problem switching your main source of drinking water to desalinized sea water from the Western pacific. Drink up,no excuses or exceptions. To Make you feel safer about this I understand this is where Sean Hannity gets all his household drinking water from.
Worker in Le Havre on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 3:36 am
You should check out what LeHavre in France spills every day in the ocean, a little bit less than Fukushima.
And what waste China is putting in the big trash can called Pacific Ocean.
And you worry about the little bit of radiation. Americans never know and will know the key points. Always talk, talk, talk and hot air comes out, maybe this is another reason for global warming.
Dr on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 3:36 am
Godzilla is coming!
Worker in Le Havre on Mon, 3rd Oct 2016 3:44 am
Else, why the big carmakers are pushing a lot to follow closely the WCMS audit.
Some thing to think:
– sand for iron casting or investment casting is coming from coastal reagons, mainly Australia, South Africa, China,…
– many car products especially engine parts are casted
– what would somebody say, if he would check his car and found some radiation, same as in the 90s after a nuclear test in the Bikini area, radiocative material contaminated the sand in the northern regions of Australia,one of the best area for casting sand.