Page added on June 6, 2013
Concerns about the impact to local groundwater by massive water use—on a scale never before seen in Michigan fracking operations—are coming to a head, as the plan for Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. to use 8.4 million gallons of water to fracture a single well has been stymied by a lack of water on site.
Instead, the company is trucking water—nearly 1 million gallons of it in just one week—from the City of Kalkaska’s water system to meet its needs. This one fracking operation today is using more water than Kalkaska is using for all its needs over the same time period.
The Westerman 1-29 HD1 gas/oil well, located on Wood Road in Rapid River Township, Kalkaska County, originally permitted to Chevron Michigan, LLC, is now being operated by Encana.
Westerman gas/oil well, Kalkaska County, MI. Photo courtesy of Respect My Planet.
The permit issued by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) authorized one water well on the site. The estimated water required for the gas/oil well was 8.4 million gallons. That compares to about 10,000 gallons used to complete or “stimulate” wells in the traditional way—a massive increase in consumptive water use by the fracking industry compared to the past.
The Michigan Water Assessment Withdrawal Tool (WWAT) estimated that 900 gallons per minute could be removed safely from the site and would cause no adverse resource impact. As it turns out, there isn’t enough water available on the site to provide 900 gallons per minute, let alone be safely removed.
An additional eight water wells were drilled on the site but apparently they did not produce either. Starting on May 31, water began being removed from the Kalkaska municipal water system to frack the gas/oil well.
Water truck filling at municipal fire hydrant in Kalkaska, MI. Photo courtesy of Respect My Planet.
The municipal withdrawal did not come close to supplying the water necessary to complete the Westerman well, so on Saturday, another water well was drilled off site in the surrounding field.
Drilling new water well off site. Photo courtesy of Respect My Planet.
That water well also failed to produce sufficient water and trucks running around the clock continued to haul more than 900,000 gallons of water from the Kalkaska municipal system over the weekend. At last report on June 4, the water was still being trucked to the well site from the municipal water supply.
“If the citizens of Michigan knew corporations were destroying hundreds of millions of gallons of Michigan water—water that is supposedly protected by government for use by all of us—they would be opposing this new kind of completion technique,” stated Paul Brady, a local resident and leading contributor of Respect My Planet. “These deep shale unconventional wells are using massive amounts of water without adequate testing and solid data on aquifer capacity.”
Brady noted that the new fracking methods permanently remove water from Michigan’s watersheds. It is polluted with chemicals, shoved deep into the ground and never returned to the water cycle. Encana has stated in shareholder presentations that up to 500 wells are planned for Michigan. Five new wells were permitted in Excelsior Township last week that estimate using 152,000,000 gallons of water. Eight more permit applications are pending.
The water use for these types of wells in Michigan is unprecedented. There is no gas or oil play in the U.S. that is using this much water per well.
The Michigan DEQ has taken some steps recently to try and deal with the astounding amounts of water destroyed by modern fracking. But as of today, the primary tools that they are using to determine the adverse impact to our water are inadequate to even judge how much water is available in any given location (as demonstrated by the Westerman well situation), never mind how much can be safely removed. Michigan has no groundwater maps of this area; state officials don’t know how much water withdrawal our aquifers in Kalkaska County can support.
However, there is a way to find this out: Do a pump aquifer yield test. State officials should require this testing whenever withdrawals of this magnitude are proposed for any reason, not just oil and gas exploration.
“This is not about the gas and oil industry,” says Brady. “We wholeheartedly support the Michigan oil and gas worker: They are our neighbors, family and friends here in Kalkaska. We are confident local oil and gas workers value the water as much as we do.”
Elected officials often remind us that water is by far our most precious resource. They need to step in and ensure that such massive quantities are not misused in this manner, and that unsustainable well drilling is not allowed.
8 Comments on "Fracking Creates Water Scarcity Issues in Michigan"
rollin on Thu, 6th Jun 2013 11:50 am
They are playing a very dangerous game by not controlling aquifer usage. Once the local wells start going dry and later come up contaminated, it will be too late.
BillT on Thu, 6th Jun 2013 2:15 pm
Fraking is playing a very dangerous game with the lives of the people in the areas where they are poisoning the water and land. Maybe a deep financial depression in the US will put a permanent end to such madness. It’s coming and soon, I think.
GregT on Thu, 6th Jun 2013 2:35 pm
Human beings can survive without SUVs, big screen TVs and Walmart. We will not survive without access to clean water, clean air and/or a stable climate.
It’s time to stop the mantra of growth, and to start thinking about the future of life on this planet, before it is too late.
HydroFuture on Thu, 6th Jun 2013 3:49 pm
Why use water for fracking anymore ???
Gasfrac Energy Services has for some time now been applying a patented method that doesn’t require any water at all and is much more productive.
Wasting water when there are cheaper and reliable alternative solutions is insane !
bobinget on Thu, 6th Jun 2013 6:05 pm
Yet, W/O fracking we are in deeply.
For investors who are into sleeping nights but still need to “Make a Living” , I have two suggestions; GE is investing several billion into fracking with a new facility to be built in Oklahoma. The deal here will obviously ‘licensing’ provided of course GE comes up with some you should pardon the expression ‘ground breaking tech. Check out GE Energy, you may like it.
The second idea is Ecosphere ESPH currently a penny stock sold OTC.
Look at this one carefully, I did but, as the last time I made a dime on penny stocks the planet had half the number it does today. ESPH is recycling fracking water.
They are ‘winning’ all sorts of dubious awards and even promise to pay dividends… soon.
While the shares are still under .40 cents one can bid half as much and still wind up losing money. However, if you skip a few cups of fancy coffee you might take
flyer on this one on your savings. It’s is my belief if the tech is as good as they say, GE will plunk down a few million and pick them up.
Plantagenet on Thu, 6th Jun 2013 7:03 pm
If there are water supply issues, then obviously they should switch to water-free fracking.
Others on Fri, 7th Jun 2013 1:25 am
As those giant oil fields are depleting, there will be more fracking.
With 30% depletion rate, more and more wells will be fracked. This will increase the cost of oil.
Already people are cutting down on oil by buying more fuel efficient vehicles.
BillT on Fri, 7th Jun 2013 3:00 am
Others, are you one of those fools investing in the killing fields? a few million ‘fuel efficient’ cars sold every year will NOT make a difference in fuel use as a whole. There are 250 million vehicles on the roads of the US. That is 20 years sales of ALL vehicles in the US. The turnover will happen long AFTER the oil has stopped flowing. Most people now own their LAST personal vehicle.