Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on January 5, 2013

Bookmark and Share

CROOKED CLEANUP (1): Radioactive waste dumped into rivers during decontamination work in Fukushima

CROOKED CLEANUP (1): Radioactive waste dumped into rivers during decontamination work in Fukushima thumbnail

Cleanup crews in Fukushima Prefecture have dumped soil and leaves contaminated with radioactive fallout into rivers. Water sprayed on contaminated buildings has been allowed to drain back into the environment. And supervisors have instructed workers to ignore rules on proper collection and disposal of the radioactive waste.

Decontamination is considered a crucial process in enabling thousands of evacuees to return to their homes around the crippled Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant and resume their normal lives.

But the decontamination work witnessed by a team of Asahi Shimbun reporters shows that contractual rules with the Environment Ministry have been regularly and blatantly ignored, and in some cases, could violate environmental laws.

“If the reports are true, it would be extremely regrettable,” Fukushima Governor Yuhei Sato said at his first news conference of the year on Jan. 4. “I hope everyone involved will clearly understand how important decontamination is to the people of Fukushima.”

He called on the Environment Ministry to investigate and present a clear report to the prefectural government.

The shoddy practices may also raise questions about the decontamination program itself–and the huge amounts of money pumped into the program.

The central government initially set aside 650 billion yen ($7.4 billion) to decontaminate areas hit by radioactive substances from the March 11, 2011, accident at the Fukushima plant. Since last summer, the Environment Ministry has designated 11 municipalities in Fukushima Prefecture for special decontamination work.

Work has already begun in four municipalities to remove radioactive substances from areas within 20 meters of buildings, roads and farmland.

The Environment Ministry itself does not have the know-how to decontaminate such a large area, so it has given contracts to joint ventures led by major construction companies to do the work.

A contract worth 18.8 billion yen to decontaminate the municipality of Naraha was awarded to a group that includes Maeda Corp. and Dai Nippon Construction. A 7.7-billion-yen contract for Iitate was signed with a group that includes Taisei Corp., while a 4.3-billion-yen contract for Kawauchi was given to a group led by Obayashi Corp. A consortium that includes Kajima Corp. was awarded a 3.3-billion-yen contract to clean up Tamura.

In signing the contracts, the Environment Ministry established work rules requiring the companies to place all collected soil and leaves into bags to ensure the radioactive materials would not spread further. The roofs and walls of homes must be wiped by hand or brushes. The use of pressurized sprayers is limited to gutters to avoid the spread of contaminated water. The water used in such cleaning must be properly collected under the ministry’s rules.

A special measures law for dealing with radioactive contamination of the environment prohibits the dumping of such waste materials. Violators face a maximum prison sentence of five years or a 10-million-yen fine.

From Dec. 11 to 18, four Asahi reporters spent 130 hours observing work at various locations in Fukushima Prefecture.

At 13 locations in Naraha, Iitate and Tamura, workers were seen simply dumping collected soil and leaves as well as water used for cleaning rather than securing them for proper disposal.

Photographs were taken at 11 of those locations.

The reporters also talked to about 20 workers who said they were following the instructions of employees of the contracted companies or their subcontractors in dumping the materials. A common response of the workers was that the decontamination work could never be completed if they adhered to the strict rules.

Asahi reporters obtained a recording of a supervisor at a site in Naraha instructing a worker to dump cut grass over the side of the road.

Officials of Maeda and Dai Nippon Construction have not responded to questions from The Asahi Shimbun.

Four workers at a site in Tamura said they were told to dispose of leaves and soil in a river. At another site in Tamura, reporters saw the leader of the subcontractor group kick a pile of leaves into the river.

A Kajima official said the company was investigating the incident.

Although the Environment Ministry has asked the construction companies to take radiation readings before and after decontamination work, the limits on measurement sites make it difficult to determine the extent to which decontamination is actually being conducted.

“We were told to clean up only those areas around a measurement site,” one worker said.

Environment Ministry officials who work on-site said it is impossible to oversee every aspect of the decontamination effort. But they said they have begun investigating the practices revealed by The Asahi Shimbun.

The latest revelations will call into question whether taxpayer money is being properly used. Some living in Fukushima Prefecture have called for using the decontamination funds to support the lives of the evacuees instead.

The 650 billion yen for initial decontamination covers limited areas in only four municipalities. Questions will likely be raised on whether the decontamination program now being implemented is the best use of taxpayer money.

AJW



12 Comments on "CROOKED CLEANUP (1): Radioactive waste dumped into rivers during decontamination work in Fukushima"

  1. DC on Sat, 5th Jan 2013 7:39 pm 

    Sad as this is, it should not surprise anyone. How you you ‘clean’ up the environment? I mean you cant, not in any meaningful way. Then you get into individuals all the way to large for-profit corporations, that are neither or equipped to do such work even if it were possible. But I suspect at the real heart of the problem with the clean up is, most of those involved in it just don’t care. Unless they happen to live nearby. All it is, is a pay-cheque, or a fat-taxpayer contract that the work can be barely done, yet they still get paid.

  2. Beery on Sat, 5th Jan 2013 9:26 pm 

    Here we go again.

    But we just need to keep telling ourselves that nuclear power is perfectly safe. If we say it long enough, we might start believing it.

  3. GregT on Sat, 5th Jan 2013 10:43 pm 

    Add all of the clean-up costs, for the next few hundreds of years, and it soon becomes apparent that nuclear is not clean nor cheap.

  4. George Jetson on Sat, 5th Jan 2013 11:08 pm 

    Nuclear power can be safe if you have the courage to spend the money needed to build next generation cores. Cheap? No it’s not cheap but if you want cheap you have do it yourself dentistry and do it yourself cataract surgery. Next gen cores can burn old waste and may even make you believe in fusion. Which may be the best long term solution but burning old waste is what a next gen reactor would do best.

  5. BillT on Sun, 6th Jan 2013 1:47 am 

    Georgie, radiation does NOT burn in the ordinary sense. If they did what should be done, you would be paying $5.00 per KWh for your electric instead of $0.12. YOU are part of why nuclear will eventually kill all life on this planet, if climate change doesn’t do the job first. Either way, humans are going extinct in the next 100 years.

  6. BillT on Sun, 6th Jan 2013 1:54 am 

    I would remind all of you about our very own Love Canal … and corporate burial of toxic waste and the deaths it caused. Only one of many sites in the US.

    It is likely that these workers had no idea what they were doing or why it was dangerous. Does our under-educated population really understand radioactivity or how dangerous it is even though there is not way to know except education or eventual death? Nope! They don’t have a clue if their government does not inform them over the TV. And it never will.

  7. MrEnergyCzar on Sun, 6th Jan 2013 2:20 am 

    Profit over people and the environment… wonderful system we live in…

    MrEnergyCzar

  8. George Jetson on Sun, 6th Jan 2013 2:30 am 

    Dear Bill,

    And you’re getting your info from whom?
    I’m sure my nuclear physicist will endorse this program…..what about yours?
    http://transatomicpower.com/products.php

  9. BillT on Sun, 6th Jan 2013 4:27 am 

    George, you use an advertisement from a corporation for your source of info? If it is so good and so cheap, why hasn’t it already happened. EVERYTHING that is remotly profitable is already being done somewhere in the world. Even marginally profitable ideas are in the works.

    Funny that nuclear has been around all of my 68 years, with the same problems, but in those 68 years, we still have the same problems. About like the nuclear fusion idea that will never be practical. Techie dreams whose failure will be blamed on ‘government’ or some other excuse except the fact that they are NOT practical.

  10. ken nohe on Sun, 6th Jan 2013 3:11 pm 

    It is quite difficult to imagine what kind of clean-up can be done on thousands of square kilometers. You cannot clean up just a village and live the surrounding hills alone so the only reasonable solution is to wait. The pollution mostly is due to cesium which fortunately has a relatively short half life of 37 years. There are good maps available which shows that within about 100 years (3 half lives of cesium), the hot spots will be mostly gone except for the immediate surroundings of the nuclear plant. Not that bad in the end. In fact, Fukushima would be a great place to build a series of new nuclear reactors. There won’t be any complain from the neighbors, there’re gone! Just put the pumps away from the beach for god’s sake and it’s a deal. This is of course a joke but the way the Japanese economy is going, it may well become reality sooner than we think.

  11. Kenz300 on Sun, 6th Jan 2013 3:25 pm 

    Nuclear energy is too costly and too dangerous.

    The people of Japan need to demand a transition to safe, clean alternative energy sources and improved conservation measures.

    Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.

    TEPCO is broke and being supported by the taxpayers of Japan. They will be paying for this clean up for decades to come. The cost of clean up, fuel rod storage and decommissioning of old nuclear power plants will show how expensive and dangerous nuclear energy really is.

  12. George Jetson on Sun, 6th Jan 2013 8:28 pm 

    Bill,

    I’ll keep this clean but gee whiz who would have thunk 68 years ago we would have cell phones or iPods. So you don’t like industry? OK then how about Government? http://www.iter.org/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *