Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on July 24, 2013
Could fracking finally kill off rural America?
Gasland 2, the sequel to Josh Fox’s documentary about the dangers of hydraulic fracturing for natural gas, introduces a frightening image.
It’s not another money shot of tap water on fire, though the water well hose lit up by the owner of a multimillion dollar home in Parker County, Texas is a wonder.
Nor is the most frightening image an internal gas industry memo labeling residents of small towns in Pennsylvania or New York State an “insurgency” that must be put down with PSYOPS techniques honed by the military in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan.
The most frightening image in Gasland 2 is a map of the United States covered with potential fracking sites.
The United States of Fracking
Look at the map. It’s hard to find a state whose water supply doesn’t originate in or cross through a place that the industry would like to frack.
So what? The U.S. government says that fracking can be done without harm to groundwater. And the industry claims that no study has ever proven that fracking has contaminated one single water supply.
Don’t believe them, says Fox, with plenty of science to back him up. Using that science, the Gasland 2 website gives a clear answer to the question “Is fracking safe?”
No. Fracking, as currently practiced across the United States, poses serious risks to the health and safety of communities and the environment.
Water supplies across the country have been contaminated by fracking. There have been multiple documented cases where natural gas, or methane, has migrated out of wells and into underground aquifers. The fracking process also forces gallons of chemically-treated watered into the ground along with numerous byproducts including chemicals, naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORMs), dissolved solids, liquid hydrocarbons including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene, and heavy metals.
Wanna be a farmer? Fuggedaboutit.
The implications of fracking America go far beyond whether your natural gas bill stays low or some bedraggled folks in flyover states get somewhat more bedraggled because they have to have their drinking water trucked in.
It’s not just Detroit that has gone bankrupt. Today, urban industrialism looks more ready than ever to collapse under the weight of its own staggering financial, ecological and spiritual debt.
Rural areas have had it tough for decades, losing family farms to industrial agriculture, losing Main Street shops to Walmart and losing young people to the allure of the big city. Yet these days, judging by all the back-to-the-landers, homesteaders and greenhorns fleeing corporate cubicles for fields of produce and pigs, you’d think that rural America was on the verge of a renaissance, ready to step up and provide the nation with wholesome food, natural carbon sequestration and a sense of community that our alienated citizenry yearns for.
Then — bam! — enter the frackers to put the kabbash on this happy ending and put rural areas back in their place as sacrifice zones for polluting industries.
By contaminating water supplies from sea to shining sea, the industry’s final desperate gambit to keep the fossil fuel party going for a few more years could render much of rural America uninhabitable. As despoiled rural communities shut down, families will have no choice but to seek housing and work in the city. And the cruel joke at the end of it all is that natural gas may turn out to be a bubble, with fracking ruining millions of acres of perfectly good land for only a few years of gas supply. The wells may run dry in five or ten years, but the pollution will remain for decades.
Meanwhile, urban escapees will have to forget their dreams of moving to a rural area, buying a little farm and building a self-sufficient homestead. If fracking renders large areas of countryside unfit for sustainable farming, not to mention plain old human habitation, disaffected downtown office workers may little choice but to stay in their cubicles, shut up and do their work — at least until the next round of layoffs.
Making the world safe for frack-ocracy
An image nearly as scary as the U.S. map is a corresponding map of the world showing shale plays that industry would like to sink its teeth into.
But don’t think the Obama Administration, which touts natural gas as a clean fuel that will help reduce climate emissions, is just sitting around waiting for other nations to get into fracking. Fortunately for top U.S. gas drillers such as ExxonMobil, Chesapeake Energy and Anadarko, the administration has recruited the U.S. taxpayer to help pry open reluctant markets like Poland and India through the State Department’s Global Shale Gas Initiative (now known as the Unconventional Gas Technical Engagement Program).
Watch the Gasland 2 trailer. Then, find a screening near you or get a copy of the DVD to watch at home.
10 Comments on "Could fracking finally kill off rural America?"
Matt Charles on Wed, 24th Jul 2013 2:04 pm
I would like to comment & say, every initiative undertaken by oil/gas companies since the industrial revolution has had its effects on mankind. With this article, I am agreeing to disagree, in terms of the fracking process being more harmful than good to communities. People fail to realize that this fracking process of obtaining natural gas from underground is beneficial to the US at a great deal, financially. Yes it is disrupting the lives of many in rural areas, but is this the first time industrial processes has impacted us? Fracking to me is the future. And I would also like to state that, drilling companies should look for new ways to curve this problem of methane & Natural gas leaking into groundwater aquifers. I do not know if experiments are being done for it at this present moment. Earn the trust of the people.
Rick on Wed, 24th Jul 2013 2:54 pm
Fracking sucks, and it should be banned. I can’t wait until the bubble blows.
BillT on Wed, 24th Jul 2013 3:01 pm
As they spread, property values will plummet. But, I think fraking is about over … due to financial reasons.
Plantagenet on Wed, 24th Jul 2013 4:26 pm
Gosh—it would be terrible if all those rural farmers and property owners got rich from leasing their land for fracking.
Or so the liberals say.
Arthur on Wed, 24th Jul 2013 4:49 pm
“Fracking sucks, and it should be banned. I can’t wait until the bubble blows.”
Go tell the Australians to do that:
http://www.infowars.com/the-biggest-oil-discovery-in-50-years/
The US has been THE oil empire in history. And for that reason, because oil is in the DNA of that empire, they are first with fracking. But that does not mean that the Bakken etc. will be the only potential source globally for fracking.
Fracking could easily add another 1-2 decades to the oil age.
rollin on Wed, 24th Jul 2013 9:20 pm
Arthur, the only reliable number is the 3.5 billion barrels of recoverable at current prices that was originally reported. That is worth 350 billion dollars and will most likely take 180 billion dollars to get it out of the ground over a 15 to 20 year period. No world changer there but at least some profit for the company and some oil for Australia.
So we might be looking at another Bakken if, and this is a big if, there is enough water to frack thousands of wells. The area is uninhabitable, meaning not enough water. Aussie’s are tough, they will probably give it a go and we will know more reality in a year or two.
BillT on Thu, 25th Jul 2013 1:17 am
Techies all want BAU so they can play with their toys and keep finding ways to destroy the world they have to live in. Fraking is a fad that is about over. The oil recovery costs are exceeding the ability to pay. When it does, game over.
There is big news when someone discovers a puddle that was known and passed overlong ago. Why was it passed over? Because it was not Profitable to recover and we have now hit that point again. We are hitting the price ceiling over and over like some frustrated child hitting his head on the wall to get attention. But nothing will be changed by news articles with a lot of words like: could, may, if, projected, 2035, should, etc.
GregT on Thu, 25th Jul 2013 3:52 am
Yes BillT,
And to add even more to the insanity; they believe that an unsustainable, ‘smart grid’ of non-renewable, finite, unsustainable energy sources, is going to allow them to continue surfing the World Wide Web, texting, and sending e-mails to people that are doing absolutely nothing to contribute to their survival, and at the same time they are not only ignoring the basic necessities of life they are advocating the further destruction of the same. Complete and total insanity.
rollin on Thu, 25th Jul 2013 4:21 pm
Yes GregT, you hit it on the head, pure insanity. Funny how the system did not look too insane at first but then it developed into a real out of control monster. Fun for some while it lasts but got a very bad downside, like becoming addicted to drugs.
Arthur on Thu, 25th Jul 2013 5:06 pm
“Techies all want BAU so they can play with their toys”
How is your internet connection by satellite doing?