Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 7, 2015

Bookmark and Share

Another Crude Train Derails in North Dakota

Enviroment

A BNSF crude oil train derailment in North Dakota early Wednesday involving 10 tanker cars remained under investigation Thursday.

The incident near Heimdal, ND, in Wells County, about 100 miles northeast of Bismarck, occurred around 7:30 a.m. CDT. The fire and smoke led local authorities to evacuate residents in the area. No one was injured, according to initial reports.

The train consisted of 109 total cars – 107 cars loaded with crude oil and two buffer cars loaded with sand, according to the state Department of Emergency Services.

At least two of the crude oil tank cars erupted into fire, according to Dave Glatt, head of the state Environmental Health unit. Glatt toldNGI’s Shale Daily that reports from the scene indicated the fires were out by Wednesday afternoon.

State and federal inspectors are to determine by early Thursday if there was any contamination to nearby water supplies. A slough close to the accident feeds into the James River.

“Our people on the scene have reported that the smoke has gone down dramatically,” said Glatt, noting that the smoke was potentially harmful to people because of its particulate matter, but it did not contain any toxic chemicals. Volatile organic compounds (VOC) are consumed in fires and don’t pose a threat to local residents.

The latest incident is part of a string of crude train derailments over the last several years as multiple 100-car-plus trains roll daily from the Bakken oil field (see Shale Daily, Jan. 3, 2014). The latest occurred at about 7:30 a.m. CDT The incident comes less than a week after U.S. and Canadian authorities released final stringent rules for rail transport of flammable liquids, including crude oil (see Shale DailyMay 1). Those rules for new and retrofitted tank cars will be phased in through 2025.

Sarah Feinberg, acting administrator at the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), said a 10- person investigation team has been deployed to the site.

The “incident is yet another reminder of why we issued a significant, comprehensive rule aimed at improving the safe transport of high hazard flammable liquids,” Feinberg said. “The FRA will continue to look at all options available to us to improve safety and mitigate risks.”

The tank cars involved in the incident are the unjacketed CPC-1232 models, which would not meet the newest federal standards, a BNSF spokesman told NGI’s Shale Daily.

BNSF personnel also were at the scene of the incident.

The cause of the incident remained under investigation, the BNSF spokesman said, with “details regarding the operation of the train…only being shared with federal investigators at this time.”

NaturalGasIntel



6 Comments on "Another Crude Train Derails in North Dakota"

  1. BobInget on Thu, 7th May 2015 9:30 pm 

    Several states refuse to fund enough rail inspectors.
    Because most rail lines never carry people just
    gas infused crude oil, rail lines are overtaxed and obviously dangerous. Oil should be transported in pipes.

  2. Dredd on Fri, 8th May 2015 9:09 am 

    One train company is taking note of inverse-planned-obsolescence in the context of the groundhog day phenomenon.

    They have trains bringing oil to coastal cities, then on the return trip they take passengers and freight of those who are moving away from the coast in anticipation of the SLR to come (Will This Float Your Boat – 8).

  3. Mark on Fri, 8th May 2015 12:33 pm 

    The tank cars themselves don’t cause the derailments (at least they are a low probability) 9 of 10 times it’s a defect in the track. Take a walk down a railroad track sometimes and look at the rotted crossties, spikes pulled out,etc. It’s basically left to railroads to self-inspect.

  4. Plantagenet on Fri, 8th May 2015 1:57 pm 

    The Obama administration’s opposition to the Keystone XL Pipeline has created an anti-pipeline anti-science hysteria on this subject. Oil pipelines are SAFER then oil trains. Any rational administration would be moving to facilitate construction of new oil pipelines to protect the SAFETY of the American people.

  5. apneaman on Fri, 8th May 2015 3:50 pm 

    What if I don’t want your pipeline on my land or running over my community’s water supply?

  6. Poordogabone on Fri, 8th May 2015 6:36 pm 

    The reason we are not building XL is the same reason that we are not building new tankers or expanding refineries, net oil production IMHO has began its decline. Don’t be trumped by the phony numbers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *