Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on September 21, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Alan Weisman’s ‘Countdown’ points to Earth’s population explosion

Alan Weisman’s ‘Countdown’ points to Earth’s population explosion thumbnail

Alan Weisman, the author of bestseller ‘The World Without Us,’ says population is going in the wrong direction to let us achieve ecological sustainability. How many people can the planet support?

In “The World Without Us,” Alan Weisman took readers for a romp through the misty primeval forest in Poland and splashed into gin-clear waters to gaze upon one the most remote and intact coral reefs in the Pacific Ocean. Besides highlighting a few of the world’s last remaining pristine places, the bestseller engaged in a thought experiment: If human beings were suddenly wiped off the face of Earth, how fast would nature overgrow cities with vegetation, reclaim the land, and demonstrate its remarkable resilience? For nature lovers, this fanciful future offered hope and irresistible images of Earth returning to a wild and happy place.

Now, six years later, Weisman has produced a sequel of sorts that adds humans back into the equation. And the place doesn’t look so happy.

In “Countdown: Our Last, Best Hope for a Future on Earth?,” Weisman explains that population is going in the wrong direction — by adding 1 million more people to the planet every 41/2 days — if we want to achieve some semblance of ecological sustainability. It’s not just this century’s projected growth to 11 billion that troubles him. Weisman is concerned about how the 7 billion of us already here are straining natural limits, from the buildup of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere to the decline of available fresh water.

“Our numbers have reached a point where we’ve essentially redefined the concept of original sin,” Weisman writes. “From the instant we’re born, even the humblest among us compounds the world’s mounting problems by needing food, firewood, and a roof, for starters. Literally and figuratively, we’re all exhaling CO2 and pushing other species over the edge.”

The theme of the book focuses mostly on the ecological question, how many people can Earth support without capsizing? It’s not a new pursuit, of course. Scholars dating to Tertullian, in 2nd century Carthage, have written about a teeming population being “burdensome” to the world.

Weisman sets out to define an “optimum population” for a sustainable Earth, one that balances the overall human numbers with how much each person consumes. As far as per capita consumption is concerned, he proposes a European lifestyle as something that would be widely acceptable but not something as energy-intensive as living in the United States or as difficult as living in much of Africa and Asia.

He doesn’t specify an optimum target population, although he sketches some 20-year-old calculations by Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich and colleagues that set the number at 2 billion or so. Instead, Weisman argues that we should get on a path of reducing our numbers or suffer the fate of the profusion of deer on Arizona’s Kaibab Plateau north of the Grand Canyon that starved to death in the 1920s.

“Like Kaibab deer, every species in the history of biology that outgrows its resource base suffers a population crash — a crash sometimes fatal to the entire species,” Weisman writes. “…Inevitably –- and, we must hope, humanely and nonviolently — that means gradually bringing our numbers down. The alternative is letting nature –- the new nature we’ve inadvertently created in our own image –- do that for us.” Such discussion is certain to raise protests, from the right as another false alarm in the tradition of Thomas Robert Malthus and from the left for focusing on the fast-growing ranks of the poor in the global South rather than reducing consumption in the rich North.

A serious environmental journalist, Weisman carefully backs up his assertions. He did a massive literature review, interviewed scores of experts and by his own account traveled to 20 countries. He goes to China to take a critical look at the totalitarian regime’s one-child policy and to Iran to praise an enlightened program launched by Ayatollah Khomeini that brought a huge voluntary drop in birthrates by educating women and providing free access to modern contraception.

Weisman takes on the Vatican’s stance on contraception, spars with Islamic clerics over confusing messages, and criticizes the pro-growth mantra of economists who ignore limits on natural resources and see a growing population as a wellspring of new customers and cheap labor.

Aside from a trip to Japan to show how prosperity can be found in a nation with shrinking population, his world tour illustrates the dismal consequences of rapid growth. He visits a slum in Mumbai. He hangs out with a gravedigger in Pakistan, the cleanup man dealing with a country bursting with population and explosive tensions. He interviews a white-goateed village chief in the West African nation of Niger, who boasts of 17 surviving children and multiple wives — his last taken “when she was twelve, when she was fresh.”

It’s admirable that Weisman, whose previous uplifting book sold more than a million copies in 30 languages, would tackle a subject that’s such a downer. Although written for the general reader, the 431 pages that mix travelogue with interviews of experts and assemblage of facts to support his analysis can be a tough slog at times — without the payoff of a bright future in a world without us.

He doesn’t fall into the seductive trap of contrarian authors who pronounce that the world’s rapid population growth will suddenly, magically correct itself or embrace blind faith that human ingenuity will triumph over adversity. Instead, he listens to the experts, such as the leaders of the world’s two preeminent agricultural research stations in Mexico and the Philippines, independently telling him that they don’t know how we can possibly produce enough food in the future to keep pace with our growing numbers.

In doing so, Weisman reminds us that when the experts are worried, we should pay attention.

Weiss, a former Los Angeles Times staff writer, is writing a book on population, health and the environment. A grant from the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting supported this project.


Countdown
Our Last, Best Hope for a Future on Earth?

Alan Weisman
Little, Brown: 528 pp., $28

LA Times



7 Comments on "Alan Weisman’s ‘Countdown’ points to Earth’s population explosion"

  1. actioncjackson on Sat, 21st Sep 2013 1:36 pm 

    “Food produced but not eaten every year costs producers $750 billion annually, damages natural resources and adds 3.3 billion tons of greenhouse gases to our atmosphere, according to a new report from the United Nations—and rice was is the biggest problem.

    According to the UN report “Food Wastage Footprint: Impacts on Natural Resources”, some 1.4 billion hectares of land, or 28% of the world’s agricultural area, is used annually to produce food that is lost or wasted.

    Without considering food waste, it is said that the world will need to produce 70% more food to feed a projected 9 billion people within three decades. But if the UN report is accurate, reducing food waste could mean we only need to produce 10% more food to feed the growing population.”

    http://oilprice.com/Energy/Energy-General/750-Billion-in-Food-Wasted-Every-Year.html

    I just found this to be relevant. I do not support purposefully increasing population.

  2. Frank Kling on Sat, 21st Sep 2013 3:25 pm 

    Look, you can’t fight human nature. For the most part, we are selfish, short-term thinkers. The politicians don’t have the guts to address the problem so business as usual will continue on until it can’t and that date is rapidly approaching.

    I just returned from a trip to the Amazon region of Colombia and the rate of destruction is mind blowing. As an example, there is a massive Chinese ship working its way down the Guaviare river. The ship is a floating timber mill. 24 hours a day the bulldozers and chain saws (yes, I said 24 hours because they use huge flood lights during the hours of darkness) are working furiously on both sides of the river strip mining the ancient forests. Following this are the earth movers that make way for monoculture African Palm oil plantations covering hundreds of thousands of acres and believe you me these people do not give a shit about the environment. Their only concern is one thing: money.

  3. DC on Sat, 21st Sep 2013 4:09 pm 

    Q/He doesn’t fall into the seductive trap of contrarian authors who pronounce that the world’s rapid population growth will suddenly, magically correct itself or embrace blind faith that human ingenuity will triumph over adversity.

    Exactly. We have been seeing a lot of this talk lately, pretty much exclusively form the so-called ‘left’.

    They call it ‘demo-graphic transition’ as we should all know here. And its a complete fraud. Its a way for mush-headed liberals to insist that +80 million people born every year = a reduction a population! A liberal version of wishful thinking that sweeps the over-population problem under the rug.

    “See, the problem will fix itself!”, its already doing it all by itself, liberals chatter to themselves. No coercion necessary, no famines, and everyone gets a happy meal.

    Except it is not happening and it never will. It sounds like Mr Weisman at least, recognizes this simple fact, at least thats the impression I get from this review.

  4. BillT on Sun, 22nd Sep 2013 2:03 am 

    Perhaps if the world gave up it’s meat habit, mostly in Western countries, there would be a more even distribution of food. I recently discovered that there are approximately 1,400,000,000 cattle in the world. That’s 1.4 billion with a ‘B’.

    To grow that much meat takes 2 pounds of grain and 100 gallons of water, per pound. A 1,600 pound steer therefore takes 3,200 pounds of grain and 320,000 gallons of water. That same grain would feed 10 people with extra.

    So, 1.4 billion cattle = 14 billion people, all things being equal. Or twice the current population of the world.

    Do the math yourself and see. It is not that we cannot, it is that we will not.

    http://mediacompost.wordpress.com/2010/04/02/weighing-the-cost-of-eating-beef/

  5. kiwichick on Sun, 22nd Sep 2013 3:02 am 

    bill

    a lot of the cattle and sheep only or mainly eat grass

    at least in australia and new zealand they do

  6. DC on Sun, 22nd Sep 2013 4:53 am 

    @Kiwichick.

    Perhaps there are still (some)grass-fed animals operations in Aus\NZ, but here in CAFO, MONSTANTO friendly North America, virtually ALL farm animals are being fed amerikas most popular pseudo-food filler.

    Corn.

    Basically, CAFO operations buy bulk, low qual corn, grind into a HFCS-like mush, and force-feed it to the animals. The animals dont like, a lot of humans dont like it. It has the same effect on animals as it does on humans-makes them sickly and fat, but thats the standard practice now.

    Unless you raise you own-no one escapes the bizarre and sick practices of the industrial food production-doubly worse in meat. I have a hard time believe Aus\NZ animals are fed near as well as you think, especially in the fragile Australian environment. Maybe NZ is somewhat better, but Australia really doesnt have the grass to spare to raise cattle. The probably feed them the same mush we do here, imported from subsidized-ag corps in the US.

  7. Arthur on Sun, 22nd Sep 2013 1:20 pm 

    Meat eating has become a useless habit of an obese western society. If you use google earth/satellite mode to zoom in on the Netherlands, all you see is meadows and hardly anything else (no forest), intended to make a big bucks on meat, milk and cheese.

    http://tinyurl.com/nrgl9rt

    At least 50% of the Netherlands is used for cows only.

    Being end fifties, with accordingly slower metabolism but no principled vegetarianism, I eat merely one meal a day, from a high quality, walking-distance family owned shop. No microwave, just oven or heating in a casserole with olive oil. Never ever meat, apart from the few snippets of bacon sprinkled through the Dutch stew of carrots, onions, beans or Asian noodles. Even with one meal a day I still have 3-5 kilo more than I would care for. Meat is a wasteful, inefficient, useless food in an obese, overpopulated world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *