Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on April 11, 2015

Bookmark and Share

Access to water supply will be a defining issue of 21st century

Access to water supply will be a defining issue of 21st century thumbnail

Ireland’s recent experience of the politics of water introduces us to a worldwide trend which is set to become one of the defining issues of the 21st century.

Water is an essential element of life but it is a scarce resource, under pressure from transboundary conflicts, climate change and capitalist growth policies.

In her book Blue Future: Protecting Water for People and the Planet Forever, Canadian author Maude Barlow, identifies three major issues in the politics of water: diminishing freshwater supplies; inequitable access between richer and poorer states and peoples; and water justice especially for women and indigenous communities.

Several compendiums of contemporary risks put water conflicts at the top of the international agenda. Some 50 per cent of the world’s usable water supply is transnational, running through two or more states. Last year a UN watercourse convention was activated, but it is non-binding and has not been signed by China or other nations in south and southeast Asia most prone to such conflicts.

A vivid account of China’s water policies in Tibet by another Canadian writer, Michael Buckley in his book Meltdown in Tibet, illustrates what is at stake. China has the world’s largest population and greatest number of dams in the world – more than 26,000, or half the world’s total. In 2011 it was decided to double this so as to reduce the reliance on coal-burning power plants.

Survival

Tibet, the world’s third largest reservoir of freshwater, is the source of some of Asia’s most important rivers – the Yangtze, Mekong, Yarlung Tsangpo, Salween and Brahmaputra – and most of the new dams will be built there. Buckley says the survival of more than 750 million people in countries downstream – India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma, Laos, Cambodia – depends on waters originating in this Chinese-controlled territory.

By damming transboundary rivers and curtailing their flow, China gains political leverage over the downstream nations. By diverting water from Tibet to other parts of China to fuel agriculture, manufacturing and mining an unprecedented hydro-engineering project is under way.

China faces some of the world’s most severe environmental problems, much of it created by American and other multinational capitalist companies outsourcing their manufacturing – and pollution – there. The country is one of the most committed to tackling these problems through tighter regulation and technical innovation, and there is a vigorous and powerful environmental movement in its civil society.

Buckley proposes much greater use of wind and solar energy in Tibet rather than concentrating on these vast hydro-projects. But China’s rulers face choices between short-term measures to ensure growth and profitability and longer-term ecological sustainability of its economy and good relations with other Asian states.

Most of them also face problems of diminishing groundwater aquifers over-used for agriculture, which consumes an average 70 per cent of the available water. India-Pakistan-Bangladesh, Israel-Palestine, Egypt-Ethiopia and China-Indochina are but some of the regions most prone to such water-based transboundary conflict. Severe water shortages are also a factor in Yemen’s rapidly escalating civil war.

Similar political choices about priorities in water policy face California’s rulers. The state of 65 million people is into its fourth year of drought driven, scientists say, by climate change. Mandatory restrictions on personal and domestic water use have been introduced by its governor Jerry Brown. But their impact is inherently limited since the state’s huge agriculture industry uses 80 per cent of its water to produce half of the US’s vegetables and fruit. Fracking is also using up an increasing proportion in California and elsewhere.

Water issues are regularly monitored in Unesco’s annual world water development report and in the annual Stockholm Water Week seminars. Both were inspired by Irish hydrologist Jim Dooge’s pioneering work linking water to climate change.
Global demand
Unesco’s latest report says the planet could face a 40 per cent water shortfall by 2030 if its use is not changed. Mass migration and wars would result. Analysis by the US’s defence department predicts global water demand will rise by 55 per cent in 35 years’ time, while the world’s population will grow by a third from the present 6.5 billion people.

Bear in mind that 97 per cent of the Earth’s supply is saltwater and of the remaining 3 per cent some 70 per cent is (still) frozen in the polar icecaps. The other 30 per cent is mostly present as soil moisture or stored in underground aquifers; less than 1 per cent of the world’s fresh water is readily accessible for direct human use.

irishtimes.com



5 Comments on "Access to water supply will be a defining issue of 21st century"

  1. Plantagenet on Sat, 11th Apr 2015 3:06 pm 

    A decent article, but I can’t imagine how any intelligent person can write about future water shortages without mentioning global warming. Its becoming clear that global warming is resulting in extreme droughts like those going on now in California, Taiwan, the southeast part of South America and Syria.

  2. ghung on Sat, 11th Apr 2015 4:50 pm 

    “…the world’s population will grow by a third from the present 6.5 billion people.”

    We seem to have lost about 800 million people somewhere (maybe they took California’s ‘missing water’ and went off planet?). Anyway, the magical thinkers still assume we’ll somehow find enough water and other resources for another couple of billion humans in the next 35 years. Incredible, this disconnect from reality; like those who insist we’ll be burning 100 million barrels of oil per day in the 2020s.

    “Powerful delusion is in that species. Doubtful they’ll last long.”

  3. BobInget on Sat, 11th Apr 2015 6:28 pm 

    Water is not the ‘new oil’.
    When oil is used as feed stock in plastics for instance, certain amounts can be recycled.
    When used as transportation fuel, no recovery is viable.

    Water OTOH can be managed. Up to now, except in historically arid regions most water was carelessly managed. That’s changing.

    Here are ten large cities ‘going dry’
    http://www.seametrics.com/blog/water-shortages/

    When climate changes, over population converge
    we see this:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/17/world/americas/drought-pushes-sao-paulo-brazil-toward-water-crisis.html?_r=0

    Humans will adapt, innovate, refine. One billion people won’t die of thirst.

    Oil is yet another story.

  4. Makati1 on Sat, 11th Apr 2015 10:00 pm 

    Water is not destroyed by our use, as Bobinget said. It is just recycled. The change is in the location of that water, not it’s total amount. It means that populations will migrate to new locations with water. In some places, this may mean a war if there is a man-made boundary (border) between.

    What will happen in the US when Cali cannot provide water for it’s 28 million residents, is that they will ‘migrate’ east or north. Mexico is another spot of change coming to the Us.

    Perhaps all of those oil and gas pipelines will someday carry water across continents. We shall see.

    If you thought my North American Union comments were BS, you may be surprised in the near future. 130 million plus are waiting just across the border.

  5. Daddio7 on Mon, 13th Apr 2015 6:29 pm 

    All my life I have heard pleas to help feed starving children in Africa. Only now it’s the great grand children of those we saved in the 50s and now there are four times as many mouths to feed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *