Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on April 16, 2012

Bookmark and Share

A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

Do You Know What the Fuel Pools Actually Look Like?

You already know that Fukushima’s fuel pool number 4 may be the single greatest threat, but that pool number 3 is very dangerous as well.

You’ve heard that unit 3′s fuel pool contains less radioactive material than unit 4 … but still a tremendous amount of radiation. Scientific American reported last year:

The pools at each reactor are thought to have contained the following amounts of spent fuel, according to The Mainichi Daily News:

• Reactor No. 1: 50 tons of nuclear fuel
• Reactor No. 2: 81 tons
• Reactor No. 3: 88 tons
• Reactor No. 4: 135 tons
• Reactor No. 5: 142 tons
• Reactor No. 6: 151 tons
• Also, a separate ground-level fuel pool contains 1,097 tons of fuel; and some 70 tons of nuclear materials are kept on the grounds in dry storage.

You’ve learned that unit 3′s reactor was the only one at Fukushima which burned plutonium. As Japan Times notes:

Reactor 3 … uses highly dangerous mixed oxide fuel, Tokyo Electric has reported.

***

No. 3 reactor is the only one at the crippled power station that was powered by the plutonium-uranium MOX

You’ve gotten the fact that – if the water drains out for any reason – it will cause a fire in the fuel rods, as the zirconium metal jacket on the outside of the fuel rods could very well catch fire within hours or days after being exposed to air. See this, this, this and this. (And that even a large solar flare could knock out the water-circulation systemsfor the pools.)

You’ve listened to experts say that – unless the rods are removed from the fuel pools before a major earthquake strikes (using special equipment which keeps the rods submerged in water the whole time) – they will likely catch fire and release huge amounts of radioactivity. See this and this – starting at 4 minutes into the video.

You’ve read that – after reviewing photos from several different angles – the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s initial impressions were that spent fuel pool number 3 might not be there at all, and that nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen said a couple of days ago:

Unit 3 is worse [than No. 4]. It’s mechanically its rubble, the pool is rubble. It’s got less fuel in it. It faces the same problem. Structurally the pool has been dramatically weakened. And, god nobody has even gotten near it yet.

And you may caught the recent headline that a 35-ton machine fell into spent fuel pool 3. As Kyodo News reports:

The operator of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant on Friday found that a 35-ton machine had dropped inside the spent fuel pool of the No. 3 unit, possibly because of a hydrogen explosion that occurred in the early stage of plant’s nuclear accident last year.

Tokyo Electric Power Co., commonly known as TEPCO, reported the finding after placing a camera inside the water-filled pool the same day to prepare for removing, as part of the decommissioning process, the nuclear fuel stored there.

One photo showed part of the machine, originally located above the pool and used to insert and remove fuel, appeared to have dropped onto the nuclear fuel storage racks.

But – until you see pictures – it is hard to get a sense of what all this means.

Here’s a picture just released by Tepco of the giant machine in the fuel pool :

AJ201204140043M A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

And another new Tepco photo showing other tangled wreckage inside the pool:

AJ201204140044M A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

The following graphics from Ashai news show how the crane is normally used to move spent fuel rods in and out of the pool. Here’s the crane bringing in a special container to hold the rods:

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

Loading spent fuel rods into the container:

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

The crane then lifts the rod-carrying container up:

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

And then away from the pool:

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

Keep in mind that the machine which fell into pool number 3 was part of the crane “used to insert and remove fuel”, and so now there is no easy way to remove the fuel from the fuel pool. And the crane at unit 4 is also broken:

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

Still confused?

Let’s look at some more pictures …

Before the Quake

Here is where the fuel pools are located in the Fukushima reactors:

 Japan Fukushima Spent Fuel A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima
Here are pictures Unit 3′s fuel pool before the earthquake, and the fuel pool crane:

R3 crane A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

R3crane A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

crane2 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

R3 insidebefore A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

R3sfp A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

This shot is during repairs at reactor 4 before the earthquake – but gives a sense of scale:

article 1367524 0B3B48D800000578 106 472x754 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

After the Quake

Here is the green fuel pool crane at unit 4 after the earthquake:

pict7 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

pict32 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

pict21 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

pict32 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

The view from above the crane at fuel pool 4:

R4 sfp4 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

(“SFP” in these photos refers to the spent fuel pool.)

Former fuel pool nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen notes that – for at least some period after the earthquake – the fuel pool had insufficient water, and the nuclear rods were sticking out into the air:

Here is water later being poured into fuel pool 4:

9 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

Reactor 3 is a mess:

 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of FukushimaLARGE3 4 A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

HouseofOust notes of this picture:

Oval is the reactor well location. Lines on the left side of the image outline the crane that seems to have fallen over or been crushed. Spent fuel pool outlined in the foreground.

LARGE3 4b A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

And of this picture:

Perspective lines are drawn to show where the deck should be and how much is gone. A circle shows the beam apex to appoximate the reactor well. Spent fuel pool is again seen off to the right and outlined. Marked structure in the foreground is the end of the refueling crane.

LARGE3 5b A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima

Now can you see what’s going on?

Washington’s Blog



8 Comments on "A Visual Tour of the Fuel Pools of Fukushima"

  1. Arthur on Mon, 16th Apr 2012 1:50 pm 

    Here is a functioning link:

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/04/a-visual-tour-of-the-fuel-pools-of-fukushima.html

  2. Arthur on Mon, 16th Apr 2012 1:55 pm 

    At the very moment that more and more people understand that fossil fuels are running out, an alternative drops dead by roadside.

  3. BillT on Mon, 16th Apr 2012 2:29 pm 

    Nuclear was never ‘an alternative’ it was a mistake from the beginning. Arrogance on the part of us humans. Since not one thought was given to what would happen to the spent fuel that would kill for thousands of years. I bet the electric companies do not have a trust fund set up to pay for that care for 10,000 years…lol.

    But, once again the military industrial complex needed them to produce weapons grade bombs and so we now have the nightmare of cleanups all over the world. Of course the sheeple were never told about the weapons part, just that nuclear electric would be ‘too cheap to meter’. I wonder if the Japanese still believe that?

  4. Arthur on Mon, 16th Apr 2012 2:38 pm 

    The French for decades got some 70% of their electricity from nuclear, so in this sense it was an alternative. They were lucky no major accident happened. Yet. But I agree with Bill, nuclear is a blind alley, I was always against it, certainly in my early naive solar=wind=everybody happy years.

  5. DC on Mon, 16th Apr 2012 6:38 pm 

    France is a very small country, full of nukes, yet they too, have no means or even a plan to dispose of the waste those plants generate. A serious accident at even a few french stations could well render most of Western Eruope un-inhabitable. When civilization goes down for good, France alone has all the power stations needed to render ALL of Eruope a dead zone, for all time. That is the risk and scenario the ‘but but france is all nooooclear and they love it’ crowd likes to sing. Imagine a Chernobyl, except not in remote and distant Ukraine, but in central France. This is Eruopes big problem. The smaller and wiser countries of the EU push ahead with wind and solar, which is good to be sure, but it wont matter if Belgium or Denmark or Germany even is largely run off renewable power if one, or more, of Frances nukes pops a lid, all that toxic crud will scatter everyone, wheither your country is run off ‘green’ energy or not, there still going to suffer hugely from Frances arrogance.

    Look at the damage this one plant is ding in Japan, out of 54. Also, Fukishima was not the only nuke damaged during that earthquake, there were what…4 others close by? We hear nothing about there condition…at all.

  6. Kenz300 on Mon, 16th Apr 2012 7:44 pm 

    Nuclear energy is too costly and too dangerous. We are now learning that the spent fuel rod pools are as dangerous as the reactor. This is a disaster that Japan will be paying for forever if they are able to get it under control. If the damage of spent fuel rods or the reactors is not contained then this could result in a much bigger catastrophe for Japan and the world. They need all the help they can get from the rest of the world. There needs to be more public disclosure coming from TEPCO and Japan’s government.

  7. MrEnergyCzar on Mon, 16th Apr 2012 8:07 pm 

    Build wind farms. They are at price parity with nuclear anyway now…

    MrEnergyCzzar

  8. Kenz300 on Tue, 17th Apr 2012 5:17 pm 

    Very scary…… why would we put our selves at risk in this way when safe, clean alternative energy sources are available? Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *