Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 6, 2015

Bookmark and Share

Why the World’s Appetite for Oil Will Peak Soon

Why the World’s Appetite for Oil Will Peak Soon thumbnail

 

The result, in my opinion, is as startling as it is world-changing: Global oil demand will peak within the next two decades.

A less potent weapon

The geopolitical and economic implications of peaking demand will be huge. The fall in the importance of Saudi Arabia is already palpable, with all the major powers from the U.S. to China more willing to accommodate Saudi archrival Iran. In addition, Russia’s ability to use oil as a weapon will wane, as will the economic leverage of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. As economic growth becomes increasingly disconnected from oil, world powers will likely shift their attention to other increasingly scarce resources that will be equally critical to economic well-being, such as food, water and minerals. A greater interest in Africa, for example, is already starting to emerge.

For sure, peak demand is far from how the oil patch sees things. The oil industry’s operating premise is that a rising global middle class from China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and parts of Africa and the Middle East will translate into soaring car ownership and fuel consumption. Officially, the International Energy Agency forecasts oil demand rising to 104 million barrels a day by 2040 from 90 million barrels a day in 2013, as surging demand in the developing world dwarfs the demand declines expected in the industrialized countries.

But I believe this forecast misses on both fronts—underestimating the extent of the decline in demand for oil in the developed world and overestimating the extent of the rise in the developing countries.

Signs of change are already apparent. Most everyone agrees, for instance, that a combination of policy inducements, energy taxes and technological breakthroughs has resulted in a peak in oil demand in the largest industrialized economies. Europe’s oil use last year hit its lowest level since the mid-1990s. The U.S. Energy Information Administration declared 2007 as the peak year for oil use in the U.S., with demand expected to fall by between 1.8 million and 2.7 million barrels a day by 2035 based on improvements in automotive efficiency and demographic trends.

ENLARGE

Moreover, signs are emerging of slowing oil demand even in China, which has been the biggest source of growth in consumption over the past decade. Diesel demand in China fell in each of the past two years, raising doubts about how much longer China’s economy will require a growing supply of oil. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., one of China’s largest fuel marketers, recently said on a call with analysts that China’s diesel demand could peak by 2017 and gasoline by 2025 as the country transitions to less-energy-intensive activities and sees through an aggressive national energy policy that promotes renewable energy and advanced automotive technology at home and for export.

IT efficiencies

But these trends are just the beginning of what will be a gradual shift that will eventually get the whole world to a peaking of oil demand.

Let’s start with the most important: the advent of information technology and big data, which are bringing revolutionary changes to daily life, especially for millennials. Exponential gains in productivity are expected for everything from transportation logistics to industrial equipment, which together with the growth of the sharing economy offer potentially dramatic savings on energy use.

We all know how much we optimize routing, timing, loading and sharing through the use of our own mobile devices. Mobile apps that help drivers avoid traffic congestion save fuel, for example, since idling in traffic wastes about 2.9 billion gallons of fuel a year in the U.S.

What might be less obvious is how this combination of satellite imagery, remote sensors, communications technology, cloud-based computing, robotics and “smart” industrial machinery is reducing the amount of fuel needed in other kinds of economic activity. Big-data analytics applied to aviation navigation is already shaving 10% to 20% off fuel demand, and similar advances are expected in the rail industry. Manufacturing via automation and 3-D printing are also expected to reduce fuel requirements.

Business-as-usual oil forecasts are also predicated on a rising need for consumer plastics, but this, too, may prove wildly overstated. Roughly 5% of global oil consumption goes to plastics production.

While it is hard to eliminate plastics from daily life, consumer companies have been trying to reduce their plastics footprint, in part in response to millennial consumers who are pushing companies to reduce waste, lower carbon emissions and eliminate landfills through intelligent design, smarter materials and recycling. Global retailers, such as apparel companies, are moving away from plastic packaging, and car companies are considering similar strategies that would curb demand for plastics substantially.

Fewer car commuters

Rapid urbanization may also point to a future drop in oil demand. Cities currently account for about 66% of global energy use, with forecasters projecting that figure to rise to 80% as the population shifts to urban centers.

But this trend of massive urbanization will more likely reduce the viability of private car ownership in the very places that are supposed to serve as the new centers of oil use, such as India, Indonesia and the Arab Gulf. Chances are, air-pollution concerns and congestion in mega-cities will prevent giant increases in the number of cars, and therefore hinder the substantial rise in oil demand that forecasters are expecting.

Increasingly, cities around the world are seeking smarter designs for transport systems as well as penalties and restrictions on car ownership. Already in the West, trendsetting millennials are urbanizing, eliminating the need for commuting and interest in individual car ownership, just as their baby-boomer parents are retiring and driving less.

At the same time, increased turmoil and low oil prices are crippling economic activity in parts of the Middle East and Africa, the two regions that are supposed to be the big drivers of continued growth in oil use. The wealth-accumulation prospects for the middle classes in these societies are uncertain—and so, therefore, is their demand for oil. What’s more, many state-sponsored fuel-price subsidies, which have been a key driver of oil demand in the developing world, are rapidly disappearing.

Finally, renewable energy is turning out to be more promising than expected, eating away at oil’s share of electricity production—and, eventually, automotive energy. China’s commitment to an industrialization program pushing itself to be the world’s major exporter of solar panels and advanced vehicles, including the production of five million electric vehicles a year, is another source of caution to those who forecast oil demand will rise exponentially forever.

None of this is set in stone, of course. A lot could change in the coming years—economically, politically, technologically—that could alter the oil-demand equation. But as Paris climate talks approach, governments around the world will be working to highlight their energy-efficiency policies and sharing information on how to lower oil intensity for the global economy. Whatever collective gains they make could seal the deal for peak demand.

Ms. Jaffe is executive director of energy and sustainability at the University of California, Davis, and chairwoman of the Future of Oil and Gas for the World Economic Forum.

WSJ



20 Comments on "Why the World’s Appetite for Oil Will Peak Soon"

  1. Davy on Wed, 6th May 2015 8:57 am 

    Sorry, demand will be dead in its tracks this year or next both for financial reasons and oil affordability.

    Once the descent begins business as usual will self destruct. Globalism cannot degrowth without a broad based decay of vital networks, distribution, and JIT production. This will further effect economies of scale IOW broad based affordability of all manner of goods including food.

    Once demand and supply destruction starts with oil we have the glass ceiling or better yet brick wall. The train wreck is close. The rebalance of consumption and population very near. Catastrophic ecosystem and climate failures in progress.

    So WSJ is trying to be a little BAUtopian negative with clarifications all will still be well from efficiency gains, urbanization, and innovation. These are exactly the wrong directions.

    The paradigm shift is here. A pole shift of wrong is right and right is wrong is upon us. Crisis will expose this new paradigm. Stick around and watch the show begins. The curtains of doom are going up now.

  2. steve on Wed, 6th May 2015 9:09 am 

    @ Davy “Once the descent begins”???? I don’t know where you are but the descent has already begun! It is just the manipulations of the market and the media that have people believing that it has not begun! In a year or two everyone will see that they have been duped….

  3. Northwest Resident on Wed, 6th May 2015 9:49 am 

    steve — Yes, the descent has already begun. Much like a banker (or other person) who takes a running leap off a tall building. For a split second, that person hangs suspended in space, the energy of his leap expended and the force of gravity grabbing hold, then, the first slow downward motion before acceleration of gravity really kicks in. That’s about where we are right now — at the short interval between two points — the point at which forward momentum ceases and the point at which powerful natural forces grab hold and reassert themselves. It seems like a long drawn out process to us, but in the grand scheme of things, it is a mere twinkle in time. Gravitational acceleration is next, and it is going to be a wild ride down. I predict a lot of screaming and sheer terror coming up shortly.

  4. marmico on Wed, 6th May 2015 10:00 am 

    Sorry, demand will be dead in its tracks this year

    Is that why the U.S. 2015 year to date petroleum consumption growth rate is up by the following:

    Gasoline +3.5%
    Distillate +4.6%
    Jet fuel +8.8%

  5. vegeholic on Wed, 6th May 2015 10:10 am 

    The frantic, gasping desperation is strong in this piece. Professor Jaffe has to reassure all of her nervous clients that everything is under control. It is only peak demand. Nothing to worry about. We are so smart with our 3D printing, Big Data and cloud based computing. Insignificant problems like resource depletion pale when compared to our awesome powers of innovation.

    This is what happens when societies and organizations self-censor the allowable topics for discussion. They no longer hear messages that are inconvenient and veer into convoluted, delusional claptrap. The professor’s exalted position as the UCD director of energy and sustainability will soon be seen as an unsustainable extravagance.

  6. tita on Wed, 6th May 2015 11:07 am 

    General idea of this article is that efficiency reduce the consumption of oil. It doesn’t really work like that. Of course, if you do exactly the same “work”, you consume less. But in reality, efficiency makes a product more attractive, and it will be more used than something else (which costs more). In the end, it increases the consumption of oil, if oil stays at the same price.

  7. penury on Wed, 6th May 2015 11:12 am 

    Being an American, I have no knowledge or interest in the world outside my t.v. As far as I know the economies of the world are recovering nicely. Production must be up all of the companies report good profits. All of us are becoming richer because the stock market is at record highs (daily) so my 401 and retirement are doing great. Every time I go to Wal-Mart it is crowded (I only go on the first of the month). After all unemployment in the U.S. if so low we have to import thousands of migrants a month thru Texas. (sarc)

  8. Davy on Wed, 6th May 2015 11:31 am 

    Steve, if you follow my Davy Doom Salad rants you will see that I clarify this current period as the bumpy descent. When the full blown descent starts at 5-10% annual descent you will know it and everyone else will know it. Even the likes of the numb nut brigade Captain Marmi and his wonder boy NOo will not be crowing. The numb nut brigade will be crying the blues or better yet committed by their families because of suicidal tendencies.

  9. Northwest Resident on Wed, 6th May 2015 12:18 pm 

    “…petroleum consumption growth rate is up by the following”

    Achieving maximum burn rate doesn’t say anything about how much fuel is left in the tank. Kind of like a jet accelerating at maximum speed, at the point just before it runs out of fuel and starts plummeting back to plant earth, it will probably be burning maximum fuel rate. There is no comfort whatsoever to be found in the fact that 2015 year to date petroleum consumption growth rate is up. All that means is that we’re on track to burn what little we have left faster. And with the overall energy content of total petroleum fuels decreasing, it makes total sense that we have burn so much more of it just to stay in the same place.

  10. apneaman on Wed, 6th May 2015 12:32 pm 

    Bla bla bla bla. I just look at the CO2. It increases every year. It is an existential threat. It’s been the trigger for 14 previous extinction periods. Apparently the majority of the apes are preoccupied with status seeking. The next climate agreement will not be binding or enforceable, just like the other one’s. Using the word “sustainable” helps increase one’s status.

  11. apneaman on Wed, 6th May 2015 12:54 pm 

    Won’t we need oil to put out our fires?
    ////////////////////////////////////////

    World’s Nuclear Power Stations Face Increasing Flood Risks

    http://floodlist.com/protection/flood-risks-to-nuclear-power-stations

  12. rockman on Wed, 6th May 2015 12:56 pm 

    NR – “All that means is that we’re on track to burn what little we have left faster.” Exactly. Again I’m surprised to again seem what appears to be the confusion between “demand”, consumption and need. Of course demand (as defined as price controlled consumption) will decrease over the long haul. PO is eventually unavoidable. Consumption patterns will be determined by which economies can afford the remaining oil reserves…just as it has always been. What will change is which consumer groups can dominate the market. IOW individual countries will face Peak Demand (i.e. Peak Consumption) at different times. IOW there is no such thing as Peak Global Demand/Consumption that is relevant to the world as a whole.

    Which brings us back to the MADOR concept: the Mutually Assured Distribution Of Resources by those economies that can outbid others for the energy to grow…or at least maintain as much BAU as possible.

    The world has never been a “fair place” and never will be. The idea that oil exporters are somehow going to diminish in power as reserves decline and the desire (not “demand”) for oil increases is beyond Pollyannish…it’s incredibly stupid IMHO. And potentially very dangerous to assume that the future struggle for energy won’t become increasingly more violent. And the assumption that countries with the power to not go gently into that good night of diminishing energy “demand” has already been proven false. All one need do is run the body count to prove it. And the keep adding as every day passes.

  13. marmico on Wed, 6th May 2015 1:17 pm 

    And with the overall energy content of total petroleum fuels decreasing

    Citation please. Is your vehicle engine coughing due to decreasing gasoline content or lack of maintenance? I think the latter.

    More word salad prattle from Rockman. THE LAW OF DEMAND says that lower prices increase quantity (growth rate) demanded. Quit being mesmerized by your repetitive circle jerking tribal talking points and focus on markets.

    Global C+C production=consumption volumes will nudge the 80mb/d mark (monthly or quarterly) within the next couple of years. That’s a long way removed from your “peak oil” lecture from “an old hand” 45 years ago when global C+C was 45 mb/d.

  14. anarky321 on Wed, 6th May 2015 1:29 pm 

    quick economics lesson for Ms Jaffe – there is a reason they call it “sitting on the oil needle” – any reduction in consumption will come from and ONLY from supply shortages… in this sense oil addiction economics are very similar to other hard drugs such as heroin and crack..ever heard of inelastic demand ms jaffe?

    “Ms. Jaffe is executive director of energy and sustainability at the University of California” – people like this being in charge of our predictions on energy use is a big part of the reason why there has been little to no prepping done for peak oil

  15. Northwest Resident on Wed, 6th May 2015 1:46 pm 

    marmico: “Citation please.”

    http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=18551

    http://www.greencarcongress.com/2014/10/eia-us-gasolines-average-energy-content-per-gallon-declined-3-from-1993-2013-due-to-increasing-ethanol-fraction.html

    “The EROI of our most important fuels is declining and most renewable and non-conventional energy alternatives have substantially lower EROI values than traditional conventional fossil fuels.”

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421513003856

    Also, as difficult as it is to accept, we must at least give some thought to the very high probability that fracked oil contains not much more energy than the energy that goes into extracting, transporting and processing it.

    The day they classified ethanol and biodiesel as “oil” is the day that the
    “overall energy content of total petroleum fuels” decreased in one fell swoop. And it has continued to decrease every day since then, and will continue to decrease every day from here on out until extracting oil anywhere becomes a net-energy loss proposition. But we’ll have lost our ability to extract oil long before then, I suspect.

  16. apneaman on Wed, 6th May 2015 2:08 pm 

    THE LAW OF DEMAND? Is that like gravity or is it some bullshit that exists in the minds of men? Some shit made up to justify certain arrangements by clever white men in the last few centuries.

  17. dubya on Wed, 6th May 2015 3:04 pm 

    Mr Marimco; your simplification of energy content is accurate – a liter of diesel still contains about the same amount of energy as it did in, say, 1858.

    However your statement ignores the IMPROVED efficiency of the infrastructure (eg engine fuel consumption per ton-mile) as well as the DECREASED societal net benefit of the produced oil in the same interval. Exploring for oil on a camel & drilling with a springy stick or a shovel uses less fuel than helicopter supply of off-shore drilling platforms.

    So unless you are particularly obtuse I think you understand that today the industry is burning more petroleum to produce about the same amount of petroleum for the end user, say, your car.

    Accounting is not a complex theory, though some people will likely never understand it. Good Luck.

  18. Northwest Resident on Wed, 6th May 2015 3:55 pm 

    dubya — Way to stick a fork in it!

  19. Davy on Wed, 6th May 2015 4:36 pm 

    N/R, I was going to compliment Dub earlier but I was hoping the Captain would speak up so I could irritate him with salad prattle. Great job Dub!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *