Page added on July 14, 2013
China has battleships, missiles and awfully effective computer hackers. Soon it will have tasty American-made pork parts in its arsenal to threaten the United States.
To the Chinese government, pork is a strategic concern. It even has a strategic pork reserve, like the United States has a strategic oil reserve.
Some senators are objecting to a large Chinese food producer, Shuanghui International, buying Smithfield, the largest pork producer in the United States, in a $4.7 billion deal. Smithfield owns 460 farms and has contracts with 2,100 others that raise about 15.8 million hogs a year just in the United States. The lawmakers want the Obama administration to block the sale of the pork company for the same reason it recently blocked the sale of a wind-power company to a Chinese company — as a threat to this nation.
The fear is that China would somehow control the pork we eat or, perhaps worse, get our critical pork production technology and our secrets of manure management. If China got mad at the United States, instead of hacking our computers they’d choke off our pork-chop supply. (That the Chinese company is willing to pay handsomely — a 31 percent premium — for our pork technology, not steal it, should be noted by the senators as a step in the right direction.)
The Chinese worry a lot about food security. Americans don’t. But Ben Becker, the press secretary for the Senate Agriculture Committee, said in an interview that this is a luxury of a wealthy country. He warned that China might not stop at buying pork companies. “What if tomorrow it is the biggest dairy producer? Or the biggest corn producer?”
Say the Chinese, in a fit of pique, decided they would not sell this country another ham hock or breakfast link. Suppose Smithfield scooped up every one of its pigs by order of its Chinese masters and shipped them to China.
Why would we care? First, we Americans have been eating a lot less pork lately. We might not notice. But second, it’s not as if China can order the world’s pigs to stop reproducing. In a few months, we’d have a whole new passel of shoats ready to braise, roast and slather in barbecue sauce. Agricultural economists say it would take a few years for the rest of the American pork-packing plants to expand and replace the lost capacity.
Surely we could get by eating chicken, fish and, yes, more vegetables, until then. And that would be only if no one else in the world would sell us a pig part. (Mexican pork is quite tasty. I’d buy that in two shakes of a lamb’s tail.)
According to The Economist’s Intelligence Unit, the United States is the most “food secure” country in the world in terms of productive capacity, technology and other factors. China is 42nd. We spend only 13.9 percent of our household income on food. That’s the lowest in the world. The Chinese spend slightly more than the average of 38.3 percent.
The senators expressed worries at the Agriculture Committee hearing that the Chinese would use Smithfield’s technology and expertise to improve their production and then take foreign markets from American producers.
In other words, they are talking about protectionism. And if Chinese companies can’t buy American wind-power technology or pork-processing expertise, it’s hard to see what they would be allowed to buy.
6 Comments on "We Need Oil. They Need Pig."
rollin on Sun, 14th Jul 2013 12:01 pm
Just one more way to sell out the US citizen that provides all the services to run these operations. Another way to make food more expensive for us here.
BillT on Sun, 14th Jul 2013 12:57 pm
Lots of political Pig Shit in this article. Of course, the biggest experts on pork would be Congress. They love it! The money kind, I mean.
With more boasting/lies by the Government Ag Dept and the the ‘experts’ at the ‘Economist Intelligence Unit'(which is not intelligent enough to see the bubbles until AFTER they burst) telling us that we should all be afraid of the Chinese because they want to buy a pig farm?
America depends on chemicals to farm and oil products to make it all possible. Then there are the food imports that give variety and the ones that do NOT grow commercially in the 50 states. Some may come from Hawaii, but they will be very expensive as they will be in high demand, like coffee and chocolate. Then there are droughts and floods and …. No, The US is NOT food secure. It only thinks it is.
BTW: The US Imports about $50 billion in food items per year and it is growing.
eastbay on Sun, 14th Jul 2013 2:57 pm
China has no battleships.
PrestonSturges on Sun, 14th Jul 2013 5:03 pm
Could the Chinese run an American pork operation for export? Americans want the leanest meat and traditional Chinese cooking wants the maximum fat. Ever had Chinese noodle soup with the 1″ chunks of pure suet? Americans would not consider that stuff “food,” they’d send it to an industrial rendering plant.
Plantagenet on Sun, 14th Jul 2013 6:01 pm
If America can sell coke, Kentucky Fried Chicken and Oldsmobiles in China, then surely China can sell Pork in the USA.
DC on Mon, 15th Jul 2013 6:51 am
The NYT, amerikas answer to Pravda.
-China has no battleships. And most of its vessels are relatively lightly armed, destroyers and frigates.
-Yes China has missiles, so do most other nations. China hardly has the huge stockpiles the US does.
-Awfully effective hackers? Nice agit-prop NYT. I am sure out of that billion or so they likely do have a few skillful hackers, but the worlds most prolific hackers are found in the ‘west’ and mainly in the US. In fact, a good many of them work for the US\corporate police state. And what do they do with there time and skills? Why they hack into foreign companies and govts, friend and ‘foes’ alike to steal information or gain leverage.
But apparently, all this is somehow related to the Chinese wanting to buy into a US mega-scale pork operation with an atrocious human, environmental and animal welfare record. I mean, if anything, Im not sure how the NYT feels that given the hideous Smithfields track record, that China could somehow be worse owners than the current ones.