
Strange new economic phenomena will kick in the moment oil production peaks, turning normal national finance ministry policies on their heads
The reason there is such heated debate over when exactly peak oil is due to arrive is because, at the point of the peak, the fundamental laws of economics governing oil production, consumption, and prices, will flip over to a whole new paradigm. And because oil is very much the key commodity at the root of all economic activity in the modern industrial world, the flip-over of economic laws governing oil will deeply affect, and even potentially flip over, the fundamental economic laws governing all the world’s industrial activity.
Not all economic laws governing oil or global industry will flip over. For example, one economic law that will remain immutable no matter what happens is the one that holds that the amount of global production of any product will always match the amount of global consumption. Price is the mechanism that brings production and consumption into line. If production rises higher than consumption, prices fall, which serves to both discourage more production and encourage more consumption. If consumption rises higher than production, prices rise, discouraging more consumption and encouraging more production.
This is the basic behavior of production, consumption and price of everything in our modern market-oriented economy, including oil.
But here is where things will change after peak oil. Until now, both production and consumption of oil have been free-floating numbers that respond at the same time to the same rises and declines in price. Usually, when prices have gone up, production would rise, and when prices fell, production would fall, thereby insulating consumption from most price swings. Since consumption of oil is a prime determinant of all other economic activity, the relative fluidity of the production side of the equation allowed financial ministries in national economies to ensure consumption of oil, and therefore basic economic activity, remained relatively smooth and growing.
The key difference that the phenomenon of peak oil production brings to the equation is that it caps the upward mobility of the production number, and in fact brings it down by a few percentage points unrelentingly year after year. What peak oil means economically is that the production rate will no longer be a free-floating number that industrial nations can rely on to respond to fluctuations in oil prices.
That means that the rate of consumption will be left alone to do all the moving in response to price signals. The necessary rebalancing of production and consumption rates, once peak oil has arrived, will be entirely up to the consumption side to achieve from then on.
As production will always be falling once peak oil has arrived, consumption must always fall too, to match the movement. The only way consumption will move down is through the market mechanism of price, which goes up as high as required to move consumption down the amount needed to match production.
Since consumption of oil is the key determinant of all other economic activity in the industrial nations, economic activity itself must move down every year.
Since it will be rising prices for oil that will be the mechanism that pushes consumption down, these higher prices will register as inflation in the industrial economies.
Inflation is only offset by rising unemployment through a balancing mechanism similar to that which forces consumption and production into line. According to orthodox practices in every Western finance ministry, inflation requires cuts to money supply, usually achieved nowadays through raised interest rates at national central banks. Higher interest rates, however, have the dubious side effect of reducing economic activity and employment. So just as industrial economies enter recession due to declining consumption of oil, finance ministers, alarmed by inflation (caused mostly by rising oil prices) will enact central bank policies that deepen the recession.
Because production of oil will drop again the following year, consumption will also necessarily drop, and will do so through the mechanism of still higher oil prices. Declining consumption will deepen a recession, and higher oil prices will once again ensure inflation resurfaces, requiring central banks to raise interest rates again, further crimping economic activity and further deepening the recession. Add to the problems the growing number of unemployed no longer involved in consumption of goods due to a lack of paycheques, and there will be yet more economic contraction, more unemployment, and more drains on government resources and a further depletion of government revenues. What all this adds up to is a depression.
How imminent is peak oil? Some authoritative bodies think it has already arrived. The US Army in 2005 produced a report called Energy Trends and Their Implications for US Army Installations. In this report, the US Army appears to be in no doubt about the imminence of peak oil and its implications: “Domestic production of both oil and natural gas are past their peak and world petroleum production is nearing its peak,” it states by way of introduction. “The doubling of oil prices from 2003-2005 is not an anomaly, but a picture of the future.” It goes on, “Once world demand exceeds supply, the price of oil will begin reflecting monopoly and scarcity rent. In fact, we may have already reached that point where demand exceeds supply.”
The result, it predicts, will be devastating. “The impact of excessive, unsustainable energy consumption may undermine the very culture and activities it supports,” the Army report says. And for itself, “To sustain [the Army’s] mission and ensure its capability to project and support the forces, the Army must insulate itself from the economic and logistical energy-related problems coming in the near to mid future.”
Echoing what analysts have been warning about for a few years now, the Army report says, “Once peak oil occurs, then the historic patterns of world oil demand and price cycles will cease.” Even the Army doesn’t want to think too much about what lies in the future: “After the peak is reached, geopolitics and market economics will result in significant price increases above what we have seen to date. Security risks will also rise. To guess where this is all going to take us would be too speculative.” But then it speculates: “Oil wars are certainly not out of the question.”
The severity of the depression will be solely determined by the significance of the role of oil in our economy. Anything we do that increases that role will increase the severity of the depression, and anything we do to decrease the role of oil in our economy will decrease the severity of the depression. We’re lucky though: It is only by happy coincidence that decreasing the role of oil in our economy will also decrease our emissions of greenhouse gases, and serve our legal commitments to Kyoto. As Ricky would say, we can get two birds stoned at once.


dave thompson on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 9:52 am
We are 10 years into peak conventional oil. That is the stuff modernity was built on and run. The above article illustrates the rampant denial of our current predicament and the lengths that are reached buy the dominant culture to obfuscate and cloud the reality we live in now.
Makati1 on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 10:19 am
Right Dave, smoke screens and red herrings. Nothing more.
Plantagenet on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 11:01 am
The author of this piece is very confused. There are no longer any commitments to the Kyoto Accord—that agreement has now been superseded by the worthless Paris Accords signed in 2015 which outlaws the global T rising more than 2° C, but places no limits on CO2 production.
The author is also confused bout the timing of the peak and what it means. For instance, the US peaked in 1970. Then the fracking boom in the US started and US oil production began growing again until it reached 1970 levels again in 2015—-45 years after the supposed peak.
AND the huge growth in US production helped throw the world into an oil glut.
Cheers!
Boat on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 11:11 am
dave
Seems to me conventional oil is making a big comeback. Brazil, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Venezuela, Nigeria can easily handle the 1-2 mbp/d growth of world consumption for 10 years.
Nat gas for fleets will continue to grow. Nat gas for ocean fleets. In 10 years we will begin to see the impact of hybrid and electric cars. Self driving cars impact the need to own a car? Fuel oil for heating is dropping.
No peak oil yet but that day is approaching. And it has nothing to do with depletion.
penury on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 11:50 am
Peak oil? So what? The world passed peak stupidity a generation ago and no one noticed. There is no Plan B for when the age of oil ends. The end of the oil age will be the end of civilization as it is currently exists. There is no plan B because there is no available energy source which can replace fossil fuels. Yes, I have heard all the hype, but I know the truth and so do you.
CAM on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 12:08 pm
Plan “B”!! There isn’t even a plan “A”!
dave thompson on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 12:47 pm
Conventional oil has been 74 to 77million barrels per day for about ten years depending on how the oil is counted. The few countries that might be able to come on line to make up a short fall of these numbers are not going to save us from the inevitable happening as we speak. Light tight crude and condensate along with nat gas increases due to fracking, leading the market to a “plantaglut” in recent years, costing billions in debt,is only keeping the dominant narrative of endless growth alive a little longer, as is indicated in this BS article.
JuanP on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 1:14 pm
The time of the peak is completely irrelevant. Things are getting worse and worse every single day in every fucking corner of the world. This phenomenon will continue for the rest of our lives and into the long term future. The deterioration of our circumstances appears to be growing exponentially, not linearly. Prepare for the worst. In a world with a changing climate, collapsing biosphere, and nuclear and biological weapons, to not prepare for the worst is unforgivable negligence if you are responsible for another human being.
JuanP on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 1:19 pm
Penury “The world passed peak stupidity a generation ago and no one noticed.” I wonder what you meant to say. I disagree with what you stated, though.
There are more people in the world every day. The majority of them are stupid. Every generation born has lower average intelligence than the one before. Based on this, I estimate that we are at Peak Stupidity right now, but tomorrow we will break today’s record and reach a new Stupidity Peak.
Davy on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 1:33 pm
What we need is less intelligence. Look where all this so called high IQ has got us so Peak Stupidity is accurate but must be clarified.
Apneaman on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 1:40 pm
In the same way more energy is required to extract and process energy, thus leaving less for the economy, more energy is going into repairing and rebuilding our infrastructure, homes and business from the consequences of burning all that fossil carbon for energy. At the rate it’s going there will be no insurance industry within a decade no matter how much oil there is. Big Gov gonna bail them out too? Big Gov is already covering much flood insurance. Do the math people, the current living arrangements days are numbered. It’s under pressure from multiple threats and they are all increasing. Last week in Texas. $2 billion in damage. Do the math. Texas and Oklahoma – here we go again…………….
Houston drenched, transport snarled in Texas floods
One death reported, at least 200 high-water rescues
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/houston-floods-texas-1.3541079
Houston largely shut down amid rain, flooding
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/18/us/houston-texas-flooding/index.html
Louisiana, Texas and Mississippi flooding forces victims from home
http://wishtv.com/2016/04/18/louisiana-texas-and-mississippi-flooding-forces-victims-from-home/
Apneaman on Mon, 18th Apr 2016 2:05 pm
Houston Ship Channel remains shut due to severe storms; 33 vessels in queue
“The suspension of ship movements in the Houston Ship Channel impacts the delivery and loading schedules of crude oil, petroleum and petrochemical products.
The 52-mile ship channel provides access from the Gulf of Mexico through Galveston Bay to various ports in Houston and other cities in the area that have many industrial facilities, including refineries, petrochemical plants and steel and metal facilities.”
http://www.platts.com/latest-news/shipping/houston/houston-ship-channel-remains-shut-due-to-severe-26421046