Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on March 7, 2016
The Myth Of Africa Overpopulation
— “Many in position of power think the world has become overpopulated recently, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population”
— “European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts’ giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth”
— “The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor’ based on those parameters”
Last month in Paris, a conference gathered a panel of white people to think about more effective ways to reduce black population in Africa.
One of the conference organizers, a historian and Associate Professor of African history, Bernard Lugan, said: “Population growth in Africa is a threat to European civilization … I’m not recommending to drop a nuclear bomb on Africa, but we can’t wait to see that population growth next to Europe. It’s a danger we have to take seriously.”
Their plan is to syndicate more closely private and public organizations in Western countries to provide money and logistics for faster and more effective actions to curb the ‘frightening’ African population growth.
This is just surreal, but let’s take a calmer road to answer the fundamental question behind such conferences and the numerous similar initiatives in Europe and the United States: is Africa overpopulated?
First, what is overpopulation?
Overpopulation is an array of negative social and ecological impacts caused by increasing competition between individuals or groups due to the increasing scarcity of resources. The scarcity could be caused either by decreasing resources of water, food and other life necessities because of a growing population, or by overconsumption of those resources due to unhealthy lifestyle or economical ideology.
Put simply, overpopulation is caused either by limited resources not enough to sustain the ever-growing population, or by overconsumption due to unhealthy lifestyle.
The debate on the world overpopulation has been ongoing for over 150 years. Many in position of power think the world has become overpopulated recently, and Africa takes the center of attention because of the constant increase in population.
Often, the people behind the Africa overpopulation debate would produce shiny graphics and complex MBA types of matrix that look very convincing, and indeed would trick people not familiar with the issues into agreeing with their points.
Here is a flipped coin perspective you won’t see in the mainstream news outlets.
In the 15th century, Africans represented 17% of the world population. At the beginning of the 20th century, Africans accounted only for a little bit more than 7%. What has happened during these four centuries of depopulation of Africa? You already have the answer. Today, Africans represent only 16% of the world population, less than five centuries ago, while Asians represent more than 60%.
Keep in mind that India is more populated than Africa while Africa is nine times the size of India. Bangladesh with half the area of Gabon has 125 million inhabitants, whereas Gabon has barely two million.
Congo is 2,345,408 square kilometers, slightly greater than the combined areas of Spain, France, Germany, Sweden, and Norway. The population of Congo is only 68 million; yet, Germany’s is about 82 million; Spain, 47 million; France, 66 million; Sweden, ten million; Norway, five million. Now, think of the little island of Britain, three times smaller than Madagascar. If you take the population of South Africa, Zimbabwe, Swaziland and Lesotho, and probably throw in Namibia for good measure, that will bring us up to the population of the UK, if not just under.
Africa is inhabited by 87 people per square kilometre, against 57 in the Americas, 246 in Asia, and 188 in Europe. It means that Europe is the most overpopulated continent in the world. Indeed, the most overpopulated countries per square kilometre are mostly in Europe, regardless of the fact that Europe had shipped over half a billion of its population surplus to two continents: America and Australia.
Five centuries ago, there were no Europeans in America, Australia, or Africa.
European countries are nowadays giving incentives to their women to give birth to more babies. Yet, an already underpopulated continent, Africa is crowded with Western ‘experts’ giving money to NGOs and governments to stop the population growth. In the meantime, China is abandoning its one-child policy to boost its populace.
Here is another perspective that casts the concept of overpopulation as a fraud and a convenient ideology because it voluntary ignores the impact per capita (per one person) and focuses on simple numerical analysis.
The problem with the world population is not that we are too ‘heavy’ for the Earth to carry, the problem with the world population is the impact of human consumption and activity on the environment and resources.
The USA consumes 25% of world resources while its population is under 5%. And the West as a bloc represents less than 15% of the overall world population while consuming over half of world resources and being responsible for 80% of the world climate change factors.
When it comes to carbon dioxide emission (‘carbon footprint’) per person on the global scale, one person in the US emits about 20 tons every year, one person in the European Union emits 11 tons, one person in China emit three tons, and one person in the sub-Saharan Africa emits a maximum of 300 kilograms. Which means the African carbon impact is 66 times less than American, and 36 times less than European.
Put simply, the impact of a single American on the environment and his role in furthering the global warming effect is equivalent to that of almost 7,000 Africans. A single European threatens the environment with the ‘force’ of 4,000 Africans.
The same goes for the consumption of vital resources like water, meat, etc. For example, the US, with a population around 300 million people, consume as much water per person as China or India which each have above one billion inhabitants. EU countries follow similar patterns.
The whole African continent’s population is less than China’s alone, and a totalGDP the size of a small country like France (France’s 2013 GDP was 2.806 trillion USD vs Africa’s 2.6 trillion in 2013) which is five times smaller than Congo.
Looking from that perspective, you can now see why it is convenient for some people to throw dubious numbers out there: attacking poor Africans is such a harmless exercise.
The debate about the world overpopulation should not be about headcount, but about a single individual’s impact on the environment, and it is necessary to recalculate the ‘overpopulation factor’ based on those parameters.
The world is overpopulated, let’s have less rich people should be the real agenda.
There are too many Americans, too many Europeans, too many Australians, too many Japanese, too many Singaporeans, and so on, because they are the people impacting our common planet in the worst way. Only, concerning Africa, we are talking about population reduction strategies funded by Western NGOs and governments.
Is it because Africa does not have resources to feed two billion people? No. It is because other nations want those resources for their own people.
If you live in Africa, and those Western overpopulation experts come to spread their dubious propaganda, ask them some tough questions and take them as the new Christopher Columbus. I hope you won’t bite on this new covert war on the poor and another distraction from the real culprits.
Finally, let me say this to those who are conceiving the African continent to be, look, and consume like Europe and America: “You are going in the wrong direction. The future requires a different model.”
50 Comments on "The Myth Of Africa Overpopulation"
Harquebus on Mon, 7th Mar 2016 9:11 pm
No, it is because phosphorus is limited. Without industrial fertilizers, coming soon, the world will not feed the 7 billion that we have now.
An angry mob is one thing, a hungry mob is a completely different animal.
makati1 on Mon, 7th Mar 2016 9:48 pm
“Is it because Africa does not have resources to feed two billion people? No. It is because other nations want those resources for their own people.”
BINGO!
makati1 on Mon, 7th Mar 2016 9:56 pm
In other news re food:
http://thebricspost.com/china-to-step-up-farm-investment-in-russias-far-east/#.Vt5LxubIoUc
“Chinese firms already lease or control at least 600,000 hectares of land in the Far East.
“We are interested in attracting Chinese investment into agrarian projects in Siberia and the Far East. In turn, as the world’s largest country with the biggest reserves of arable land we can supply China with food products, especially agricultural products,” Russian Premier Dmitry Medvedev told his Chinese counterpart Li Keqiang in Moscow in 2014.”
For the math challenged, that is about 2,300 square miles. Not a bad sized farm. LOL
dooma on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 1:20 am
I would like to see information on population growth defined by religions NOT continents.
Oh look, here is one right here:
http://www.pewforum.org/2015/04/02/religious-projections-2010-2050/
theedrich on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 1:23 am
Another White genosuicidist screed. If Africa were “underpopulated,” the Negroes there would not be pulling out all the stops to invade White countries. The only reason why Negroland has 16% of the global population today is because guilt-propagandized, rich “philanthropic” Whites are using it as a humanitarian theme park to show how much they are expiating their own Judeo-Christian guilt. If you took away all of the “foreign aid” to corrupt Afican jungle bunnies (in exchange for oil, etc.), the whole of Blackland would exponentially expand its already massive flight to South Africa, Europe or America. Rhodesia/Zimbabwe is a typical example of Negroid proficiency in government. Somehow the darkies just don’t want to stay in their homelands.
And notice, by the way, that not just in White countries, but wherever they have emigrated to, the Afroids are always at the bottom of the socio-economic heap. And that is not even mentioning their innate proclivity to violence.
Maybe Boko Haram will accomplish what White NGOs can’t.
yoananda on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 2:17 am
“Is it because Africa does not have resources to feed two billion people? No. It is because other nations want those resources for their own people.”
No. It’s because of african’s low IQ. They don’t have the cognitive ability to exploit their ressources.
So they trade their ressources for white technology (hospital, highway, univesities, smartphones).
Yes africa is overpopulated regarding what they can do by themselves, and they are starting to flood Europe. What other proof do you need ?
GregT on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 2:57 am
“What other proof do you need ?”
The President of the most powerful nation on Earth, is a Negro. No more proof necessary. IQ is not determined by race.
Also yoananda, the Earth is not ours to exploit, unless we plan on killing our species off. It is not a resource base for capitalist consumerism. It is our one and only home. Destroying that home for profit, is the most fucking stupid thing that the Human species has ever done. That, and ‘white technologies’. We are not exceptional. The worst sub-species to ever decimate the face of this planet. We are an evolutionary dead end. Both you and thee neo-nazi above you, are prime examples of the worst of the suicidal naked ape species. If natural selection cannot weed your genes out, we’re done.
IFuckYouOver on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 3:00 am
Look at this video. The first think I thought is low IQ inbreed people that function at a biological primal level: eating, shitting and trying to reproduce.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ3t-YRqD7M
Click on the little planet above to see the page in any language. This is what they are trying to teach to immigrants in Germany.
http://zanzu.de/ar
GregT on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 3:29 am
” The first think I thought is low IQ inbreed people that function at a biological primal level: eating, shitting and trying to reproduce.”
If you were capable of thinking above a primeval level yourself IFYO, you would understand that putting other human beings into cages is not a morally acceptable thing to do. Not surprising that you idiots support human imaginary lines drawn in the sand. (AKA borders) You all deserve what is coming to you. Stupid fucking human livestock that you all are. Lesser than sheep, the three of you idiots.
IFuckYouOver on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 3:32 am
Here is something for you Greg, to calm your prmitive mind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2vOyd3T1VM
GregT on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 3:45 am
I didn’t need your help IFYO, anyone with two brain cells left to rub together could have easily figured it out on their own. Thanks though, for yet another prime example of how fucked up our white sub-human species really is.
More for us to be proud of.
Pennsyguy on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 3:56 am
“I’m living in a cuckoo clock!”
Homer Simpson
Davy on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 4:05 am
Trying to justify overpopulation with history, per capita, and national comparisons is missing the point. Overpopulation is what it is. Africa is set to explode with population just has industrial society is set to deflate and decay. Africa is a big continent but significant amount of that big area is not able to support population density. In the prime living areas we see significant current overpopulation in Kenya and Nigeria among others. The rest of the world is already overpopulated which begs one to consider how Africa is going to feed the increases in the pipeline. Asia is off the charts in the red. Then there is populations in the developed world too high per consumption levels likewise dangerous and destructive. Most every nation is overpopulated per our carrying capacity in a period of forced degrowth and climate instability. Famines and mass migrations are coming to Africa and Asia. The developed world may fare slightly better with social mayhem and food insecurity but famines are not out of the question. Our carrying capacity will rebalance. No amount of explaining away a bad situation is going to change that.
GregT on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 4:09 am
Matt Groening, an exceptionally intelligent white caucasian human being. Presenting us all with a satirical look at ourselves. Unfortunately, most of us are too brain dead to figure out the message that he is delivering. We think that it’s funny, but it isn’t. In reality, it’s very sad.
GregT on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 4:19 am
Those countries that depend the most on modern industrial society, and JIT delivery systems, will fare the worst when they both end. Those countries that do not, will not notice the difference nearly as much. The one country with less than 5% of the world’s population, that consumes over 20% of the world’s resources, is in for the most pain when BAU comes to an end. No country will get through this unscathed, but that one country is in for the biggest awakening, and the largest shit-storm of any other country on Earth. The country to the North of it will be in nearly as much trouble.
Satori on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 4:54 am
who was it who said something to the effect
“the American way of life is not negotiable” ?
I know Darth Cheney said it
and Obammy said it also in so many words
I’m willing to bet we’ll leave the earth a charred,burned out cinder before we abandon “the American way of life”
as long as we have the worlds most powerful military
we WILL use it
yoananda on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 5:10 am
So in fact, the choice is simple :
1/ whether white european/american people get poorer to help billions africains get richer (and pray they don’t want to be more rich at one point, and pray to be treated fairly once white will no longer be the dominant one, and pray enough white women will be aviable to black males)
2/ whether white people let black starve and deal with culpabilty of “stealing” all their wealth.
What other choice do we have ?
Davy on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 6:18 am
Everyone will get poor. Some will become poor more than others and quicker than others but all will fall together and completely eventually. It is likely the poor will suffer first and the worst. Overpopulation, carrying capacity breach will combine with failing global support to cause widespread famine. The richer regions will follow as the global system decays and begin to collapse to lower economic activity levels. The richer areas will likely feel more pain relatively because they have the furthest to fall. Richer areas are exposed to complex systems of support that are not sustainable. Yet, how can you measure relativity with absolutes like starvation.
The sad truth for the poorest is they have very little to fall until they have nothing. Some like to be idealistic with sympathy for the subsistence third world. They have this view the third world’ers are noble and stoic and the rich depraved and weak. The truth is a little more nuanced and harder to generalize but the truth is closer to the greater the population densities and lower the wealth the more danger. The greater the connections to critical nodes the better positioned the nation or region is in the collapse process. In other words areas without importance to the global system will be left to fail. Regions that are dominant and critical to globalism will survive the longest. If this process is a quick fall this point is mute. If this collapse is a long emergency then that is where this point will matter.
Plantagenet on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 6:34 am
The Gates Foundation is spending billions on medical care —including birth control —in Africa
Bill Gates deserves a Nobel Pesce Prize for this good work
Aire on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 7:05 am
As far as collapse goes… it really also depends on whether its deprived citizens take up arms or not to determine which will be more chaotic. As far as I can tell at this point, war-torn Africa and the Middle East are suffering the most at the moment- adding more people to these regions is looking like a recipe for more destabilizing but on the other hand adding more people in the 1st World is bringing about increasing climate destabilization.
Of course these trends as of now can always change..
makati1 on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 7:40 am
Well said, GregT. America has the most pain and despair coming as they have the most to lose and no ability to be self sufficient. Heavy drug use, high levels of obesity and disease, and a dumbed down citizenry now too stupid to feel the heat cooking them in that pan of hot water called American Exceptionalism. Couldn’t happen to a more deserving country.
Practicalmaina on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 8:00 am
Africans are migrating for the same reason that Libya and Syria are shitholes, climate change and po.
Are they going to start poweri ng EU? http://www.documentarytube.com/articles/can-sahara-power-europe-tunisia-s-plan-for-gigantic-solar-farm-might-make-it-possible
Practicalmaina on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 8:09 am
GREGT, you are on point today. I am always suprise to see people who are supposed to be informed being so ignorant. I thought yoananda had some intelligent thoughts occasionally but I was mistaken.
Kenz300 on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 9:30 am
Too many people……….create too much pollution and demand too many resources….
China made great progress in moving its people out of poverty…….one reason was slowing population growth…..
If you can not provide for yourself you can not provide for a child.
CLIMATE CHANGE, declining fish stocks, droughts, floods, air water and land pollution, poverty, water and food shortages all stem from the worlds worst environmental problem……. OVER POPULATION.
Yet the world adds 80 million more mouths to feed, clothe, house and provide energy and water for every year… this is unsustainable… and is a big part of the Climate Change problem
Birth Control Permanent Methods: Learn About Effectiveness
http://www.emedicinehealth.com/birth_control_permanent_methods/article_em.htm
Ubani, Okezie Daniel on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 9:51 am
Africa is the “Mother” land and hopefully it will be here for the survival of our specie. It is a story that those who have put such great effort to change have ensured its foretold ending.
Africans, the Negroid race and the land have survived the worst of times. It is raining and in good time this year!
penury on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 12:54 pm
Shock, Africa is overpopulated. So are China, India,Mexico,Cuba, and quite possibly 139 other countries. The world is over populated and the difference between lack of resources and being unable to obtain the resources is like the difference between being ill and being sick.And by the way, how many of you have had your DNA tested to determine your ancestors?
Apneaman on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 1:52 pm
Keep the Hate Alive little douchebag. Too bad there is no tribe of haters for you to join. Yep the minute these trumpeters find out you an atheist you’re up on the scaffold with the jews and blacks and mexicans. Well I guess in a way you’re already in a tribe – the tribe of retard Americans – big tribe.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXq_WBV3_YI
little douchy after running his stupid mouth?
https://youtu.be/x4aw53NLqeE?t=99
Poordogabone on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 1:55 pm
“Is it because Africa does not have resources to feed two billion people? No. It is because other nations want those resources for their own people.”
Not to mention the tactics used to grab those resources since post colonial times. For example propping up thugs as rulers who simply sold out their nations and peoples for a few bucks at the expenses of freedom, democracy, prosperity, clean environment etc.
Also the “north” gets its free lunch everyday from the “south” and throw the crumbs back at them and call it foreign aid.
Nony on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 4:07 pm
Researchers establish a link between racism and stupidity
Findings taken from numerous research projects strongly indicate that prejudice, racism and intolerance are more likely to be present in individuals with greater cognitive rigidity, less cognitive flexibility and lower integrative complexity.
Despite their important implications for interpersonal behaviors and relations, cognitive abilities have been largely ignored as explanations of prejudice. We proposed and tested mediation models in which lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice, an effect mediated through the endorsement of right-wing ideologies (social conservatism, right-wing authoritarianism) and low levels of contact with out-groups. In an analysis of two large-scale, nationally representative United Kingdom data sets (N = 15,874), we found that lower general intelligence (g) in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood, and this effect was largely mediated via conservative ideology. A secondary analysis of a U.S. data set confirmed a predictive effect of poor abstract-reasoning skills on antihomosexual prejudice, a relation partially mediated by both authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact. All analyses controlled for education and socioeconomic status. Our results suggest that cognitive abilities play a critical, albeit underappreciated, role in prejudice. Consequently, we recommend a heightened focus on cognitive ability in research on prejudice and a better integration of cognitive ability into prejudice models
http://pss.sagepub.com/content/23/2/187.full
Nony on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 5:19 pm
not my post
yoananda on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 5:26 pm
@Nony
“Researchers establish a link between racism and stupidity”
yes ! that’s why europeans are the less racist (xenophobib) people of the planet, and that’s why the black and arabs are so racists that, everytimes something goes bad in their country, it’s never their fault, it’s the fault of the whites that they asked for help some times before !!!!
Davy on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 5:36 pm
I find people obsessed with race, class, and creed shallow and boring. There is so much more to people and cultures. These people are trying to feel superior by diminishing others but in the process they are diminishing themselves. These activities point to personality issues. Often it is a lack of self-esteem.
twocats on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 5:37 pm
not my post [nony]
which one is the real nony? who can say? it’s too bad fake/real nony is disavowing real/fake nony’s post, because it would have been one of the most redeeming posts ever by real nony.
Apneaman on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 6:34 pm
“I find people obsessed with race, class, and creed shallow and boring.”
Really? Then why you have spent so much time making sure everyone knows that you are a 1%er baby who often hops aboard the private family jet for jaunts to visit mommy and daddy in their 1%er island paradise?
You are so completely full of shit!
makati1 on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 7:06 pm
Ap, I no longer read Davy’s bullshit, but, from your comment, I see that he has not changed. Too bad. It is difficult to overcome the pampered life of a 1%er. That 2X4 is gonna hit him extra hard one of these days.
Davy on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 7:31 pm
The best thing about Mak recently is the complete failure of his agenda. Look back a year and now look at his message. Why do you think I don’t waste my time with him anymore? The Phoenix avatar says it all with his gaudy grandiosity and lame narcissism.
Apenea just wishes he could feel something. His life is a failure and he expresses that failure daily by lashing out at life hoping for some kind of feelings. All he has is mom and bad memories of drugs and a failed marriage to an American. I find it interesting that both Mak and Apnea have failed American marriages. Could it be the hate they have for their X’s is why they hate everything especially Americans?
Boat on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 8:10 pm
Now look guys. The appeal of this site is the bat shyt crazy posters that hang out here. Friggen wild ass foriegners. Live a little, it has never been this good since the beginning of man.
Himself on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 9:16 pm
My children, I love you all.
The end may be nigh (I don’t know what dad’s got planned)
But I want you to know that you are loved, you’re doing the best you can and will continue to, whatever happens.
We’re all in this together.
Unconditionally,
JC
Oneaboveall on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 10:57 pm
Thanks for posting that vid. IFYO. I’d totally take turns sticking my face in those girl’s asses.
Go Speed Racer on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 11:59 pm
There was one good one, about 3rd from the left. But that’s not a very high percentage.
Like Trump said, “should there be women in combat? Sure as long as its the ugly ones”.
twocats on Wed, 9th Mar 2016 12:05 am
The world is overpopulated, let’s have less rich people should be the real agenda. [article]
I’m not really sure what all the arguing is about, its like I’ve got kids fighting upstairs and all I know is that its load.
Returning to the article – there’s a shocking idea – these are some great comments, and that should indeed be the manta. It’s not about race or gender, its about responsibility with resources.
I’ve never heard Davy talk about jetting to the islands, but I have heard him talk about his commitment to agriculture and localized economies, which is good enough for me.
Another point on the article, beyond “population control” Africans need to worry about multinationals buying up fertile land in order to export crops to feed their out of control populations.
theedrich on Wed, 9th Mar 2016 12:08 am
Go see your shrink, Greggie boy. The current jungle bunny in the White House was put there by massive White Guilt preceded by affirmative action, not by his pitiable IQ level. His real father, by the way, was not some Kenyan he lies about being his sire, but American Negro Frank Marshall Davis (December 31, 1905 – July 26, 1987), a card-carrying Commie who impregnated teenage whacko Stanley Ann Dunham. Clearly no facts will cure your psychopathy, or that of the hypocrites you elect to lead you in the frozen north.
Whatever White faults may be, we are the only ones who have even a chance of making it through the coming bottleneck. It is highly unlikely that you and the paranthropoids you prefer will squeeze through, however. Because the name of the game is survival of the fittest.
Truth Has A Liberal Bias on Wed, 9th Mar 2016 12:19 am
Most white people in USA are fat, stupid, uneducated and lazy. They ain’t making it through any bottleneck. Most whites will die in place while they blame all their problems on immigrants or democrats or some other such lame excuse. I’m pretty much shooting every white American I see once state surveillance decreases due to collapse. You’ll all make better fertilizer than you did people.
IFuckYouOver on Wed, 9th Mar 2016 6:21 am
How many pseudo-name do you have Dave ?
You sound like a mentally retarded kid living of mommy basement.
Kenz300 on Wed, 9th Mar 2016 10:00 am
The worlds poorest people are having the most children. They have not figured out the connection between their poverty and family size.
Endless population growth is not sustainable.
If you can not provide for yourself you can not provide for a child.
Birth Control Permanent Methods: Learn About Effectiveness
http://www.emedicinehealth.com/birth_control_permanent_methods/article_em.htm
Kenz300 on Wed, 9th Mar 2016 9:40 pm
Having a cild you can not provide for is CRUEL………..
Wrap it up or snip it………
GregT on Wed, 9th Mar 2016 11:35 pm
“Whatever White faults may be, we are the only ones who have even a chance of making it through the coming bottleneck.”
The only ones that have a chance of making it through the coming bottleneck, are those who aren’t reliant on the system when it breaks down.
Many tribes still exist around the globe who are not dependant on modern industrial society. None of them would be white.
GregT on Wed, 9th Mar 2016 11:53 pm
“It is highly unlikely that you and the paranthropoids you prefer will squeeze through, however. Because the name of the game is survival of the fittest.”
The name of the game will be survival of the fed. Difficult to be the fittest without a supply of food. Growing your own yet theedrich? Or in typical whitey fashion, are you expecting everyone else to grow it for you?
twocats on Thu, 10th Mar 2016 12:33 am
If you can not provide for yourself you can not provide for a child. [kenz]
if you cannot [have an empire] provide for you, you cannot [have an empire] provide for your child.
there I fixed it so that your statement can at least apply to you. maybe you should stick to those three sentences you know about EVs.
GregT on Thu, 10th Mar 2016 1:03 am
The Kenz300 was in dire need of a software upgrade at least two years ago twocats. Too late. It’s hardware is now obsolete.