Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on July 7, 2014

Bookmark and Share

The Energy Cost of Local Food

The Energy Cost of Local Food thumbnail

In The Energy Cost of Food I showed how incredibly energy intensive the US food system is. There’s a common assumption among those in the local food movement that one benefit of relocalizing food systems is a reduced demand for energy. As someone who’s been doing energy input-output audits of small farms for years I’ve come to believe that the realities of local food are a bit more nuanced. In The Energetics of Food Distribution I started chipping away at the myth that locally distributed food is always more energy efficient, and in this post I’ll explore the energy cost of local food in greater detail.

The graph below shows, at left, the energy input needed to produce, process and distribute the average calorie of meat, vegetables and dairy according to US Department of Agriculture data [1, 2]. At right are data I’ve gathered on several small farms throughout Vermont. As far as vegetable production goes, the CSA farm uses slightly less energy to get their food to consumers than the average US vegetable supply chain, while the other vegetable farm that sells at farmers’ markets and delivers to some wholesale accounts ends up requiring more than twice as much energy as the US average to put its products in the hands of customers. Realize that ‘Distribution’ in the columns at left are not just the energy used in long-distance transport, but also the energy used in wholesale warehouses and retail outlets which are left out of the local vegetable data on the right. If my audits had included the totality of distribution energy, the columns associated with local producers would be taller still.

ECoLF

On the other side of the fence, I also present data from a local pork & beef farm, a sheep farm, a diversified farm and a grass-based dairy farm. The dairy looks amazing compared to the US average, so amazing that I spent extra time ground-truthing the data to make sure there weren’t errors. It uses less than half as much energy as the average US dairy farm to produce milk, and since it’s grass-based it likely turns out a higher quality product. The audit I did does not include off-farm energy use in processing or distribution though, so my audit doesn’t tell the whole story of this farm’s milk. The sheep and pork/beef operations didn’t fare so well relative to the energy intensity of US meat, on average. Neither of these audits included all food distribution energy or the energy used to slaughter and process meat before sale, so the energy used throughout the entire supply chain for these farms’ meat is higher than what’s shown.

As I point out in The Energy Basis of Food Security there’s a strong relationship between energy prices and food prices owing to the high energy demand associated with food production. As long as local food fails to gain an advantage over larger scale food production in terms of its energy intensity, it’s reasonable to expect the price of local food to trend with energy prices just like food from larger-scale operations. Perhaps the higher energy inputs often needed for small-scale farms partially accounts for why local food tends to be pricier than comparable mass marketed products? While food enterprises in general need to pay more attention to their energy intensity, this is particularly true for smaller enterprises that seek to market their products locally.

Years back a pair of planners, Branden Born and Mark Purcell, wrote an article warning that there’s nothing about smaller scale enterprises that make them inherently better than their larger counterparts [3]. The audit results I’ve presented suggest Born and Purcell’s premise is accurate with respect to the energy intensity of food production. While a few small-scale agricultural operations prove superior to their larger counterparts, most do not. This is true both in the realm of vegetable farms as well as those that raise meat. It doesn’t necessarily have to be this way; I suspect smaller farms have much more flexibility in their management practices than larger operations, so a thorough energy input-output audit could help farmer achieve substantial efficiency gains. The big question, of course, is whether farmers and the communities they serve will see enough value in an energy audit to invest in one.

HowEricLives.com



8 Comments on "The Energy Cost of Local Food"

  1. HARM on Mon, 7th Jul 2014 11:14 am 

    On the graph, why are “Dairy” and “vegetables” listed twice, and with widely different results?

  2. Aspera on Mon, 7th Jul 2014 12:01 pm 

    The three left-hand columns are USDA data for the average farm of that type. The six others are from energy audits that Eric did of individual farms.

  3. Plantagenet on Mon, 7th Jul 2014 12:42 pm 

    On the chart—why is one column labelled “vegetable” and the other labelled “vegetables”. Did he break out ketchup into a separate category?

  4. James on Mon, 7th Jul 2014 3:27 pm 

    Did you figure all of this out for when oil is left out of the equation? That is the whole premise behind Peak Oil. If oil is gone, food will be grown on a farm just to feed the farmers and not other people.

  5. Aspera on Mon, 7th Jul 2014 3:33 pm 

    True. Yet, didn’t we once grow food on farms without oil and fed both the farmers and others?

  6. Bandits on Mon, 7th Jul 2014 4:08 pm 

    We also used to hunt, log and fish when everything was bigger a more plentiful. Now there are factory farmed fish and livestock and regrowth softwood.

    Farms are no different, the degradation due to constant industrial agriculture, reliance on fossil fuels combined with pressure to accommodate an exploding population is robbing us of a future. There is no going back to 90% farmers. The lower forty has a strip mall on it now.

  7. Northwest Resident on Mon, 7th Jul 2014 4:14 pm 

    About 95% of the population in pre-industrial Europe used to be involved in farming. That’s pretty much what everybody but the royalty, professional soldiers and craftsmen did. During times of war, many of the farmers would get conscripted or voluntarily join the “army”, but they would return back to their farmland for planting, growing and harvesting season, then once the harvest was in, head back to the battle. I read that all somewhere, and it seemed to be from a reliable and authoritative source.

  8. shortonoil on Mon, 7th Jul 2014 4:30 pm 

    Having grown up in Vermont, and having worked on diary farms all through my teenage years, I can attest to the energy efficiency of the small family Vermont dairy operation. A family farm milking 40 to 50 head doesn’t use as much energy as the average house in America. The Old Vermont farmer is a penurious creature by nature. They use very little fertilizer, rotating crops, and letting their fields remain fallow 1 out of three years. Manure from the barns is spread back onto the fields. Only during harvest, which lasts about three weeks is there much machinery use. Hay is cut and baled; corn is cut and cropped to supply feed for their herd through the long Vermont winter.
    Every farm house has a wood stove or two, and the wood comes from their own woodlots. They are a rare breed of people, and unfortunately going extinct.

    Vermont is a gorgeous pile of rocks. It is only three and a half hours from two major metropolitan areas; New York, and Boston. A couple of decades ago the land rush began in Vermont. Prices went up ten fold, and the cost of living followed. The small farmer was driven from his land to make room for developments, and million dollar homes. It was called progress. Today there remains maybe a tenth of the farms that were there when I was growing up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *