Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on January 29, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Re-enchanting Economics

Re-enchanting Economics thumbnail

Economics as we know it today is broken.  Unable to explain, to predict or to protect, it is need of root-and-branch replacement.  Or, to borrow from Alan Greenspan, it is fundamentally ‘flawed’.  But where do we look for inspiration in facilitating what is the mother of all paradigm shifts?  Interestingly enough, the most insightful and strikingly innovative ideas seem to be coming from all directions other than the economics profession.

From ecology comes the insight that the economy is best understood as a complex adaptive system, more garden to be lovingly observed and tended than machine to be regulated by mathematically calculable formulae.

From anthropology we learn that economy and society are inseparable and that markets and money are relatively recent arrivals, a thin veneer layered onto a much older history of cooperation, gift and reciprocity.

Psychology and neuroscience reveal that we are more complex and multifaceted beings than the one-dimensional man of classical economic theory, motivated only by the selfish and individualistic acquisitiveness that miraculously guides the invisible hand: “In reality, man is much more like an anxious, moralising, herd-like, reciprocating, image-conscious, story-telling game theorist”, as Rory Sutherland wrote in a recent issue of Wired magazine.

In short, the creation myths and assumptions underlying classical economics are revealed to be shallow, erroneous and unhelpful, products of the era in which the discipline of economics was forged and of the desire of its founding figures to claim the scientific muscle of the ‘hard’, natural sciences.

The task, then, is to build a new kind of economic theory rooted in a contemporary understanding of who we are as a species and framed by the ecological limits of the beautiful blue planet that we call home.  Or rather, the imagining and articulation of such a theory is a key step in the real work of building economic models, norms and behaviours that can help us live well within our means.

This is the work that we are about here at Schumacher College.  We are now in the second year of our postgraduate programme, Economics for Transition: achieving low-carbon, high-wellbeing, resilient economies, designed and delivered in association with the new economics foundation and the Transition Network.

This is likely the world’s only economics postgraduate programme that begins with an immersion in whole-systems science – complexity and chaos theory, Gaian science, systems theory – locating economics from the outset as a sub-system of ecology.  Our core assumption is that ‘nature is mentor’.

The enquiries undertaken within the programme are as rich and varied as the students undertaking them:

  • deconstruction of our everyday language, deeply encoded as it is with the values and assumptions of the old paradigm we are trying to transcend, and the playful invention of a new vocabulary;
  • re-building the Commons as the creative and democratic heart of our economy and communities;
  • the emergence of dispersed, collaborative networks of economic actors as a rival to the centralized, hierarchical structures that dominated the twentieth century;
  • re-imaging and designing money systems that serve people and planet;
  • how best to facilitate the emergence of alternative meta-narratives to the busted flush of the neoliberal project (and the role of the arts in achieving this)………..

……..and many more besides.

All this is, of course, of the greatest significance for the Transition movement.  For what we are about in our various community-level initiatives goes far beyond tweaking the existing system through the introduction of incremental change.  We are part of a broader movement whose project is to transcend the dominant reductionist, mechanical story about the world and our place within it and to weave ourselves back into the web of life.  What we are about is the critical task of re-civilising and re-enchanting the grey science that is neoclassical economics.

Jonathan Dawson is the Chair of the Economics for Transition programme at Schumacher College, lived and taught at Findhorn, and has been in involved in development in work in Africa and Brazil.

Transition Network



6 Comments on "Re-enchanting Economics"

  1. GregT on Tue, 29th Jan 2013 3:41 pm 

    “the emergence of dispersed, collaborative networks of economic actors as a rival to the centralized, hierarchical structures that dominated the twentieth century”

    As long as economics and greed are part of the human meme, dispersed, collaborative networks, will evolve into centralized, hierarchical structures. Economics is a failed concept, and the sooner that we learn to live in harmony with our environment, and our fellow human beings, rather than capitalize on them, the better off we will all be.

  2. Plantagenet on Tue, 29th Jan 2013 5:10 pm 

    There are many schools within Economics. The schools in economics that recognize the important of energy and energy flows in the global economy are working just fine, thank you very much.

    Just because most economists can’t figure out why $100+/bbl oil slows down economic growth doesn’t mean that it isn’t happening and that the effects of high energy prices aren’t readily apparent around us.

  3. GregT on Tue, 29th Jan 2013 5:42 pm 

    All economic activity requires exploitation of natural resources, many of which are non renewable. As long as we continue to exploit these resources we are merely lining our own pockets today at the expense of the future of the natural environment and future generations.
    We can survive on this earth without economies. We will not survive without a healthy natural environment.
    To not rethink our flawed idea that the earth is ours to create wealth, will ultimately result in our own species demise as well as all others.

  4. LT on Tue, 29th Jan 2013 7:59 pm 

    Mr.Greg T,

    Well said! I agree with you.

  5. Keith_McClary on Wed, 30th Jan 2013 5:35 am 

    “Psychology and neuroscience reveal that we are more complex and multifaceted beings than the one-dimensional man of classical economic theory, motivated only by the selfish and individualistic acquisitiveness that miraculously guides the invisible hand: ‘In reality, man is much more like an anxious, moralising, herd-like, reciprocating, image-conscious, story-telling game theorist’ ”

    Hey, economists have enough trouble with the math just for the “one-dimensional man”. Do you expect them to go back to math school to learn multivariate calculus?

  6. Dick Burkhart on Wed, 30th Jan 2013 6:35 am 

    The profession of economics is in dire need of a revolution. It’s great to see Schumacher College leading the way. All economists should be studying the limits to growth and what this means for the future of humanity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *