Page added on April 22, 2013
Oil plays an essential role in almost everything that touches our everyday lives. From the food we eat to the means by which we transport ourselves, our goods, and our services, to what we grow, build, have, own, need, and do, oil is almost always an important element. But the painful truth now and soon is that the ready supply of oil and gas that we almost always take for granted is on its way to becoming not-so-ready—recent production increases notwithstanding.
What happens when there’s not enough to meet all of our demands, to say nothing of those of every other nation—including the many countries seeking more growth and prosperity? What sacrifices will we be called upon to make? Which products will no longer be as readily available? Which services? Who decides? What will be decided? Who delivers that message to the designers and producers and shippers and end users? What’s their Plan B? And how will we respond when decisions are taken out of our hands? Where exactly will the dominoes tumble?
There is nothing on the horizon that will work as an adequate substitute for the efficiencies and low cost and ease of accessibility that oil has provided us. We simply do not have the means to make that happen—not the technological capabilities, not the personnel, not the industries, not the leadership … yet. Clearly, we do not have enough time to do it all with effortless ease and minimal disruptions.
Piecemeal approaches that address some small aspect of need for some short period of time in some limited geographical area for just a few consumers is in the end a monumental waste of limited resources, time, and effort. We can’t wait until we’re up to our eyeballs in Peak Oil’s impact to start figuring out what to do. We’re too close as it is. We’re going to have to be much better, much wiser, and much more focused. **
Here’s the latest contribution to my Peak Oil’s Impact series—observations and commentary on how Peak Oil’s influence will be felt in little, never-give-it-thought, day-to-day aspects of the conventional crude oil-based Life As We’ve Known It. Changes in all that we do, use, own, make, transport, etc., etc., are inevitable. A little food for thought….
With baseball season upon us, I thought it might make sense to dust off and borrow portions of the very first Impact post I wrote nearly three years ago. Edited for clarity, updated just a bit, and restricted to portions relevant to baseball, here it is:
It’s easy enough to mention the fact that balls, and helmets, and cleats are all made with crude oil as an essential component—either in the product itself or used to create/deliver/transport some materials before and after manufacturing is completed. It’s also safe to assume that once we begin dealing with curtailed availability of fossil fuels, some needs will have lower priority than others. Ambulances will probably have access to fossil fuel-based crude oil (gasoline) before manufacturers get the supplies and equipment they need. Obviously there will be ripple effects across the industry when this happens, and the end users (from the junior leaguers and the neighborhood kids all the way up to the professionals) will also have some problems to contend with: either the products will become less available, or they will become prohibitively expensive for many along the chain of users. What happens?
What happens when high school sports programs with limited funds as it is have to replace cleats and helmets and other accessories and their prices have doubled, or tripled, or the helmets and cleats are simply not being manufactured any longer on a scale sufficient enough to meet demand? What happens then?
Let’s also take a broader view. How do teams (high school, college, the pros) deal with travel issues and schedules when gas is much too expensive to enable teams to transport their players even short distances, or when air travel is severely curtailed and wildly expensive because not enough jet fuel is being processed to meet demand (and airports are shuttered because air travel has diminished markedly*), or when the fans cannot afford to put the gasoline in their vehicles that in the past allowed them to attend the games without a second thought?
What happens when half, or a third, or one-tenth the number of fans can afford to attend games because budgeting all that money to drive to an in- or out-of-state stadium no longer makes financial sense? Pure supply and demand: when demand continues and supply is reduced, prices go up. Decisions are then made about where to allocate funds. Does a trip across the state to attend a Red Sox game make more sense than paying for your children’s basic needs for the next few months?
Where will the revenue to pay players come from when the majority of fans are no longer traveling to see the games either because limited gas supplies are now being allocated or it’s simply become too expensive for “frivolous” trips? How do owners continue to fund their vast operations (office staff, marketing, scouting staffs, minor leagues, utility services for the stadiums and training facilities, and on and on it goes)? What happens to the vendors and other suppliers when the majority of fans just stop attending … permanently?
For all their current revenue, what happens to the Red Sox or Yankees when they are scheduled to travel to Tampa Bay, or Texas, or to the West Coast, and it costs a small fortune in fuel costs alone for charter planes? What rail services currently exist that offer a practical alternative? Exactly how far out does the ripple effect extend?
No organization, no group of individuals no matter what their financial status, and no industry that currently utilizes fossil fuels to any extent will escape the effects of Peak Oil. For all the magic and excitement and joy of athletic events, sports will suffer the impact of Peak Oil every bit as much (if not more) than many or most other industries.
What happens then?
5 Comments on "Peak Oil’s Impact: Baseball"
sunweb on Mon, 22nd Apr 2013 1:08 pm
The real threat of peak oil to the many games and teams is the removal of the emotional outlet of us against them. This is a natural human (perhaps even life behavior – some plants lay down poisons to competitors) behavior. Without this release and until a new benign one is found, there is danger of displacement to find a culprit to our problems – arabs, women, children, Jews.
GregT on Mon, 22nd Apr 2013 3:08 pm
From Wikipedia:
“Bread and Circuses” (or bread and games) (from Latin: panem et circenses) is a metaphor for a superficial means of appeasement. In the case of politics, the phrase is used to describe the creation of public approval, not through exemplary or excellent public service or public policy, but through diversion; distraction; or the mere satisfaction of the immediate, shallow requirements of a populace,[1] as an offered “palliative.” Juvenal decried it as a simplistic motivation of common people.[2][3][4] The phrase also implies the erosion or ignorance of civic duty amongst the concerns of the common man.
In modern usage, the phrase is taken to describe a populace that no longer values civic virtues and the public life. To many across the political spectrum, left and right, it connotes a supposed triviality and frivolity that characterized the Roman Republic prior to its decline into the autocratic monarchy characteristic of the later Roman Empire’s transformation about 44 B.C.
sunweb on Mon, 22nd Apr 2013 4:32 pm
Our global consumption of fossil fuel energy is threatened by the continued dwindling of easily accessible, high quality sources. This in turn threatens global conflict (oops already happening), more deadly global conflict. And this use is devastating and threatening land, oceans, rivers, the air, underground water, climate and peoples very homes and health. So what can we do?
Check out the pictures of stadium parking lots and other stuff in this essay.
http://sunweber.blogspot.com/2011/11/saving-energy.html
BillT on Tue, 23rd Apr 2013 6:43 am
The new game will be world war and there will be no winners.
Arthur on Tue, 23rd Apr 2013 8:31 am
“The new game will be world war and there will be no winners.”
How do you think this ‘world war’ is going to look like?
I can garantee you that no regular European, Russian or Chinese troops will ever be storming the beaches of Carolina or California. What could happen though is that just like English and Americans (Orwell, Hemmningway for example) where supporting the communists in Spain in the thirties against the Spanish catholics, European and Russian irregulars could fight along side the US-Euro’s, when the US itself will be on fire, when diversity has arrived at it’s inevitable Grand Finale, that can only be prevented by turning the US in a totalitarian communist state (what is what is happening in slow motion as we speak).
So, how is a ‘world war’ going to look like? You really think Washington can mobilize Euro-America again to fight the rest of the world, now that they don’t have the broad shoulders of the Soviets to hide behind, who did 80% of the work in WW2 (US 15%, UK 5%)? The US can’t even beat third rate powers like Vietnam, Iraq or Afghanistan, so how do you think the US will perform against China, Russia, on their turf?
What certainly could happen are localized conflicts, first and foremost Iran, but very likely will be confined to blockades by the US Navy. But if Washington would decide to directly challenge China, they would risk the consistency of their own ‘country’ (Babylon in reality) and a wave of secessions within the US would result.
The most likely outcome is not a WW2-style world war, but garrison-USA, constantly at low-level war in remote places with China and Euro-Siberia. Exactly as Orwell predicted.
http://strangemaps.files.wordpress.com/2007/01/1984_fictious_world_map.png
The Korea-situation write large.