Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on November 18, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Peak Oil : A Look At “Peak Demand” # 6

Consumption

IMGP0758

Peak oil demand is a provocative theory and would rely on some unanswered questions being met: namely on the  development of large-scale gas-fired trucks, rail and shipping vessels; the sustainability of the US shale boom; and policy action to support improved fuel-mileage and to phase out oil subsidies. [1]

DAMNED FACTS

A Citi Research report on so-called peak oil demand [first post of this six-part series here] has been drawing a lot of attention lately. Understandably: what could be bigger news for anyone concerned with climate change, energy security, etc.? The report comes out hot right from the start, suggesting ‘The End is Nigh’ and we are ‘Approaching a Tipping Point’ on global oil demand.
Unfortunately, though, it’s less than persuasive. The first thing that ought to raise an eyebrow or two is how wildly Citi’s analysis diverges from that of established data information centers like the International Energy Agency and the US Energy Information Agency—not to mention our own Roadmap Model, or Exxon Mobil, or really anyone else at all—on the demand for oil from transportation and other global activity, based on known business-as-usual practices, vehicle ownership and activity, technology trends, and adopted policies.
One explanation for that divergence is that the Citi report relies on questionable assumptions about known changes in the transportation sector. In particular, Citi’s assumption that fuel efficiency will trend upward at 3–4% per year is highly misleading. (links in original quote; detailed explanation followed) [2]

NICE STORY; TOO BAD IT’S B.S.

The straw man argument suggesting that we peak oil proponents are spreading fears about “running out of oil” has certainly been a convenient starting point for the more calm and presumably rational, dispassionate reasonings of fossil fuel-industry soothsayers. That this argument is not true has become largely irrelevant. Peak demand, energy independence, vast massive reserves as far as the eye can see, a boom just beginning … these and variations of the same themes by more powerful and monied media and industry cheerleaders have all but drowned out the other perspective about peak oil and future energy supplies.

Taken together, the improvement in global fleet efficiency and the substitution of natural gas for oil could be enough to put in a plateau for global oil demand by the end of this decade [3]

The idea that the US heavy-duty vehicle fleet could consume 0.5 million barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2020 of natural gas stretches credulity. This would imply that about 15% of the US heavy-duty fleet energy use, meaning over 1.5 million trucks, would be natural gas. Natural gas for trucks is making major inroads, to be sure, but this level of penetration into the heavy-duty fleet would require a dramatic inroads for natural gas among more diverse, long-distance truck types. The vehicle technology, the commitment by manufacturers to bring mass-market products to market, the infrastructure, and the policy are simply not in place to make this natural gas vehicle scenario happen [4]

CONSIDER THIS

For those of us who believe that the ongoing depletion of conventional crude supplies actually matters—especially when coupled with all of the fact-based, context-rich arguments about unconventional substitutes (such as tight oil, the tar sands, deep-sea resources, and the expense, diminished energy efficiency, rapid depletion rates, etc. all associated with exploration and production)—the message remains too important to set aside. Serious advocates of peak oil’s reality never raise fears about running out of oil.

What we suggest instead is that the combination of the key facts stated above calls for more deliberate and intelligent planning to shift away from our full-blown dependence on oil to alternatives. No solution is perfect, easy, inexpensive, or guaranteed. Transitioning the near-infinite complexity of modern industrial and cultural life away from that dependence won’t happen overnight.

Completely ignoring the facts of a finite resource now on the downside of its production capabilities and the unpleasant, inconvenient facts about what we’re currently doing to replace conventional crude oil supplies is not our wisest strategy. Those alternatives tell a pleasant tale, but unless we’ve abandoned any and all notions of long-term, fact-based planning, the usefulness of that story will be short-lived, and painful. There’s little on the fact-based horizon suggesting world demand is on the verge of peaking.

From 2005 through 2010, the growth in demand from China and India was double the demand lost in the U.S., and 1.14 times the combined demand loss of the U.S. and Europe. [5]

World oil demand doesn’t appear on track to peak in analyses that are based on known technology and policy trends. If only wishing made it so. The peaking of world oil demand is indeed achievable in the 2020–2030 timeframe. The indicated 3–4%/year efficiency goals are achievable; in fact, efficiency technology could go even further if long-term policies are enacted. But getting there will require the adoption of many dozens of new efficiency and fuel policies around the world, as well as billions of dollars of investments by leading automakers, suppliers, and fuel providers. Even if conventional oil supplies will peak, far more technology and policy action will be needed to stabilize the demand for oil use in the 2020 or even 2030 timeframe. (links in original quote) [6]

As uncertain and inconvenient as renewable energy development may be, if we aren’t appreciating the limitations of fossil fuel reliance beyond next week, we’re creating nothing but more challenges and problems in the years to come. Worth considering?

~ My Photo: Celebration! Red Sox win the World Series – 10.30.13

Looking Left and Right:
Inspiring Different Ideas,
Envisioning Better Tomorrows

Peak Oil Matters is dedicated to informing others about the significance and impact of Peak Oil—while adding observations about politics, ideology, transportation, and smart growth.

Peak Oil Matters



6 Comments on "Peak Oil : A Look At “Peak Demand” # 6"

  1. ghung on Mon, 18th Nov 2013 3:17 pm 

    At least Mr. Turcotte seems to have a sense of scale, though I’m not so sure about; “…but unless we’ve abandoned any and all notions of long-term, fact-based planning…”

    I’ve never considered “long-term, fact-based planning” an option since there is no ‘we’ when it comes to planning. Humans societies are largely reactionary; change when they have to, or when forcing is involved. There is no over-arching central authority; no ‘plan’. This is why we have booms and busts; why we blow bubbles and scramble for solutions after the fact. Oil/fossil fuels have blown the greatest bubble that humanity has ever experienced, by far. It’s all-encompassing and global this time. The resulting bust will be proportional.

    Question is, can humans deflate this bubble rather than just watching it go POOF? Again, it’s a matter of scale, and that there is no plan. Some say we’ll adapt, but ignore that, in nature, most adaptations fail.

  2. rockman on Mon, 18th Nov 2013 4:07 pm 

    And I’m stuck back on the basic issue that any prediction of demand (utilization?) depends on pricing just as do future oil production rates. How much demand will there be for NG as a motor fuel in the future will depend if it’s selling for $4/mcf or $12/mcf. And that’s only important if one doesn’t assume that demand (consumption) will always match production.

  3. J-Gav on Mon, 18th Nov 2013 5:08 pm 

    Rock – You have good reason to be stuck on that issue as it will likely be the one which exposes the scam ie that the Emperor doesn’t even have enough stitches left on him to cover his privates …

    Ghung – I don’t even know if you should put a question mark on that one – “Can humans deflate this bubble etc.” … seeing as how they’ve never demonstrated the ability to do so.

  4. Stilgar on Mon, 18th Nov 2013 5:11 pm 

    “Humans societies are largely reactionary; change when they have to, or when forcing is involved. There is no over-arching central authority; no ‘plan’.”

    That’s the same conclusion I’ve reached, Ghung, and really the scariest part about the human experience, because no plan means anything can and will happen usually without notice.

    Peak Demand is the great obfuscation from Peak Oil. America is known for coining terms the encapsulate a lot into a few words, and it gets used politically all the time. But reality will not alter via changing a term, but instead act to perpetrate BAU further out on a ledge.

  5. tahoe1780 on Mon, 18th Nov 2013 10:02 pm 

    Long before substantial numbers of Nat Gas trucks, and their required infrastructure, make an impact, ePower’s diesel-electric hybrids will contribute to peak demand. http://www.altenergystocks.com/archives/2012/12/epowers_series_hybrid_electric_drive_unmatched_fuel_economy_for_heavy_trucks.html

  6. action on Tue, 19th Nov 2013 12:03 am 

    Peak demand is the point where the price of oil drops back down below $30… From what I can actually observe, we’re at peak homeless people standing at the intersections; and somehow I get the feeling they’re connected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *