Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on October 3, 2012

Bookmark and Share

Output not stockpiles key to cap food cost

Consumption

* More investments needed to increase food

production-Piebalgs

* France proposes agricultural stockpiles to tame food

prices

(Adds background on French proposal, comments on biofuels)

MILAN, Oct 1 (Reuters) – Building strategic agricultural

stocks to curb market volatility, as proposed by France, would

not be the most effective way to tame food prices, EU

Development Commissioner Andris Piebalgs said on Monday.

He said what was needed instead was an increase in food

production in the world’s poorest countries, which remain

vulnerable to the threat of a new food crisis despite the recent

easing in grain prices from record highs hit this summer.

Last month, French President Francois Hollande launched a

global campaign to win support for creating strategic stockpiles

of food commodities after a year of drought renewed fears of a

new crisis in agricultural supplies.

Paris has also called an emergency meeting of G20 farm

ministers for mid-October to discuss ways to curb price

volatility.

“I believe it is one of the instruments but it is not the

most effective,” Piebalgs told Reuters in an interview on the

sidelines of an international cooperation conference in Milan

when asked about the French stockpiles proposal.

“The answer to food insecurity is sufficient food production

in the world’s poorest regions,” he said, adding that increasing

investments in agriculture was the best way to keep a lid on

prices.

“Resilience in farming, access to water, fighting against

climate change, crops, access to the markets – it’s a lot of

elements, one element does not help sufficiently,” he said.

The worst drought in more than 50 years in the United States

has sent corn and soybean prices to record highs over the summer

and, coupled with drought in Russia and other Black Sea

exporting countries, raised fears of a global food crisis like

the one that led to rioting in poor countries in 2008.

Food prices have fallen back in the past few weeks but

Piebalgs said there was no room for complacency.

“Globally, food prices are now not a matter of concern in

the short term but there are problems in the Sahel, continuing

problems in the Horn of Africa and other regions,” he said, also

mentioning Haiti. “The situation remains very vulnerable.”

France first raised the issue of reserves last year as it

chaired the Group of 20 leading economies. But the final deal

limited promises to food aid stocks in countries that might most

need them, a measure that is yet to be implemented.

It is unclear whether Hollande will be more successful this

time round in convincing the United States or his European peers

to rebuild public grain stockpiles that were liquidated decades

ago. Or, as in the case of China, to use existing government

stockpiles more collaboratively to address global issues.

The French proposal, which was backed by the U.N.’s Food and

Agriculture Organisation, did not specify how and where the food

stockpiles would be developed.

Analysts have been sceptical about the idea of reserves on a

global scale because they are costly to run, particularly as

grain has a shorter storage life than commodities like oil.

Piebalgs said he hoped European moves to cap the use of

food-based biofuels would be followed elsewhere, and said there

was a growing consensus, even in the United States, which is a

major biofuels producer, that food crops should first and

foremost feed people.

“We believe that biofuels should be produced from food

residues after crops have been used for providing foodstuff,

then the remains can be tranformed for second- and

third-generation biofuels,” he said.

The EU Commission announced a major shift in biofuel policy

last month, saying it plans to limit crop-based biofuels to 5

percent of transport fuel..

REUTERS



2 Comments on "Output not stockpiles key to cap food cost"

  1. DC on Wed, 3rd Oct 2012 10:09 pm 

    You know, this is a funny article. Its essential point is, that the JIT food system is best and actually stockpiling the stuff is bad. Bad for who exactly? Well, the corporations and there JIT system for one. In times past, EVERYONE stockpiled food. Both govts and individuals did because if you did not, you would likely not eat for large parts of the year. Now that sensible and long standing practice has been turned on its ear, and our corporate masters think having a 3 day supply of food over entire continents is about all they are willing to tolerate. When I was younger, I remember it was 2 weeks supply in the event of disruption was the figure. Now I hear, in a very short period of time, were down to 3-5 days. Given what I see in grocery stores, im more inclined to think the 5 days is probably optimistic.

  2. BillT on Thu, 4th Oct 2012 1:01 am 

    DC, as you know, at one time even the government stockpiled grains and other food stuffs like butter, meat, etc. You know, the 7 good years for the 7 lean years idea. But that prevented the price of food from escalating too fast and cut the profits of the middle man.

    Then corporate farms took over and the surplus disappeared because it could be sold today. Zombie seeds, petro chemicals and big Ag control food supplies today and they maximize profits, not supplies. You have to buy new seed every year or starve. No saving seed from the previous crop to replant next year. They will not sprout.

    No soil kept rich by putting the crop residue back into the ground to improve the soil. Nope! Now it is sold for some other non-agricultural use and quick profit. Well, the game is about up. Billions will die and many of them will be in the so called 1st world of the West, including bloated America.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *