Page added on March 30, 2012
Smart-grid people aren’t always peak-oil people, or vice versa. But both have good reasons to back the other, considering how the two issues could increasingly be going hand-in-hand.
The idea behind a smart grid is this: an “internet of things” that connects all the parts of our energy infrastructure — coal-fired power plants, wind farms, homes and businesses (with or without solar panels), cars and more — can help them all work together more efficiently, effectively and automatically.
The idea behind peak oil is this: globally, discoveries and production of oil — a finite resource — are bound to reach a peak at some point, after which the amount of petroleum we can pump out of the ground goes into a gradual (or not) decline.
The connection is obvious: anything that can make our use of energy more efficient is critical if our energy supplies can no longer grow enough to meet demand.
Now, in most developed economies, oil is no longer a major fuel source for generating electricity. Instead, most of our electric power comes from a combination of other fossil fuels — coal or natural gas — and from renewables like wind, solar, hydro and biomass. (There’s also nuclear, the not-exactly-fossil-or-renewable energy source.) The trick, especially if we increase our use of renewables, is keeping the lights on even when the wind isn’t blowing or the sun isn’t shining. And that’s where a smart grid can help.
“Smart grid technology could play a major role in maintaining the reliability of the electricity system in the future by helping to reduce peak demand and to manage fluctuations in renewables output,” noted the UK’s Industry Task Force on Peak Oil & Energy Security in a 2010 report. “There are three key areas for focus in realizing the potential of this technology:
“Energy efficiency and microgeneration can also play vital roles in the policy response.”
The strategy of smarter coordination to manage is demand already helping a country like Denmark make the most of its wind power while ensuring that its households still have electricity when the wind doesn’t blow. A smart grid that’s also a supergrid could do the same across Europe.
“Here’s how Denmark copes with the intermittency of its wind power,” writes UK science adviser David MacKay in his book, “Sustainable energy – without the hot air.” “The Danes effectively pay to use other countries’ hydroelectric facilities as storage facilities. Almost all of Denmark’s wind power is exported to its European neighbors, some of whom have hydroelectric power, which they can turn down to balance things out. The saved hydroelectric power is then sold back to the Danes (at a higher price) during the next period of low wind and high demand. Overall, Danish wind is contributing useful energy, and the system as a whole has considerable security thanks to the capacity of the hydro system.”
While that approach can work well for the electricity grid, it doesn’t currently solve our transport challenges. Oil is still the fuel of choice for transportation. And in that use, it’s also the hardest to replace with wind, solar, coal, nuclear or pretty much any other energy source. That’s why many smart-grid and peak-oil people advocate a shift to electric cars.
As the 2010 peak oil report notes, the electricity grid is “likely to see a significant change in its demand patterns if there is a significant move in the direction of road vehicle electrification.” And that’s where a lot of ground-work remains to be done: electric cars offer a way to reduce our dependence on oil, but they create whole new challenges for the grid, even a smart one.
“The introduction of smart grid technology may alleviate some of this, but the ground needs to be prepared for the introduction of such technology and all the economic and social implications of flexible pricing that are enabled in this scenario,” the peak oil report states.
The economic and social implications, unfortunately, tend to be the ones explored and acted upon by political leaders, a group that these days seems incapable of accomplishing much of anything.
6 Comments on "How can a smart grid help with peak oil?"
BillT on Fri, 30th Mar 2012 4:24 am
Again, about 20 years too late. No there will never be enough electric cars to make a difference…lol. And electric use is going to continue to drop as rates increase and salaries decrease. Malls are going to close and factories shut down. The energy use will drop with the economy.
DC on Fri, 30th Mar 2012 5:48 am
Smart grid is the dumbest idea yet. Complex, expensive, and all so the a centralized privately or quasi-privately owned utility can take control of your friggen dryer and turn it off when they feel like. What a great idea. And they want to do all this wirelessly too! Guess we love complex boondoggles that never get to the root of the problem. Forbid manufactures to put standby power in all there electro crap-junk. Stop building more power stations, but a cap on power generation. Stop pandering to increases in power ultilization, and start putting up laws and regulations that make it impossible or very diffcult to waste energy as easily and causually as we do. The so-called smart grid is not deisgned to limit the growth of power consumption, but to free up power in order to sell to ever larger #s of ‘consumers’.
If we actually regulated devices that suck down energy even when there not in use, we wouldnt need a smart grid would we? The build I live in. Every unit has its own energy wasting washer and dryer in every….single..unit. And of couse, the strat ‘forbids’ you form actually drying anything on your deck. The garage downstairs is brighly lit and heated 24/7 in winter and fall, prob summer too for all I know, even tho its empty 98% of the time. And thats just one crappy, over-priced condo building out of 100,000s just like it across N.A. That doesnt even get into the stupid coffee machines with micro-chips, the TVs, steros, w/e all on ‘standny’ drawing staggering sums of power, and mostly un-used. WTF do we need a smart grid to for, to manage our stupidity or laziness perhaps???!
BillT on Fri, 30th Mar 2012 10:06 am
Eliminate the power wasters like:
Lawns and all the power crap they require. Electric leaf blower, trimmers, etc.
All the electric toys and techno crap like I pods/pads, X boxes,etc. Make TVs expensive so it goes back to one per home, not one per room.
Have a teared billing schedule like taxes. The first 100 kwh at a cheap rate for the poor, and double it every 100 after that so that by the time use hits 500 kwh it is 16 times the base rate. You can live quite well with 100 or 200 kwh per month. But it requires thought and no waste.
Turn off all outdoor advertising everywhere. And reduce the bulbs in street lighting or turn them off after midnight.
Americans cannot complain until they have really cut back to basics and then still cannot afford electric. Likewise, gasoline.
Norm on Fri, 30th Mar 2012 10:17 am
Yah, smart grid is a bunch of hooey, not gonna work. Presuming you have a whole bunch of internet communications to ‘manage’ the generation and the loads, that you can get around the fact that you dont have a proper power source in the first place.
I would recommend as a better solution, dig up all the landfills, and burn up all the garbage and some old tires, and make a big giant plume of black smoke. At least that way you could get some power generated.
BillT on Fri, 30th Mar 2012 11:19 am
FYI: An article about waste…
“…Under current situation, 100 million discarded cell phones in China weigh 10,000 tons, from which, 1,500 kilograms of gold, one million kilograms of copper and 30,000 kilograms of silver can be extracted…” The value of those metals is about $100 million in today’s market. Or $1 per phone.
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90778/7773266.html
tubaplayer on Fri, 30th Mar 2012 9:52 pm
@BillT
I rarely comment here but I have to say that I always look forward to your comments and 99% agree. Thanks Bill – saves me commenting. I think the saying on British English would be “Singing off the same hymn sheet”.