Page added on December 29, 2013
Recent research conducted by the University of Nebraska suggests that nearly one-third of global rice, wheat and corn crops have reached their maximum yields in farmers’ fields. A field of unharvested wheat is seen in Labastide d’Armagnac village in Landes, southwestern France,
Recent research conducted by the University of Nebraska suggests that nearly one-third of global rice, wheat and corn crops have reached their maximum yields in farmers’ fields.
The revelation raises concerns about the ability to meet food production needs amid a rising global population.
Production of cereal crops has decreased or plateaued recently, the researchers report, noting that the projections typically used to ensure food security amid a growing population are based on a constant increase in yield. The University of Nebraska research, published in the journal Nature Communications, suggests that a constant increase in cereal crop yield is unlikely given that about 30 percent of rice, corn and wheat crops around the world have reached maximum yield.
“Estimates of future global food production and its ability to meet the dietary needs of a population expected to grow from 7 billion to 9 billion by 2050 have been based largely on projections of historical trends. Past trends have, however, been dominated by the rapid adoption of new technologies – some of which were one-time innovations – which allowed for an increase in crop production,” the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, said in a statement.
The UNL researchers suggest that future crop protections are too optimistic considering the one-time technological innovations that led to increased yield in the past.
For the research, UNL scientists Kenneth Cassman and Patricio Grassini, of the agronomy and horticulture department, and Kent Eskridge of the statistics department, analyzed past cereal crop yields in the countries with the greatest production of the crops.
Their analysis suggests that the projected linear crop production increase is unlikely: “The rate of yield gain has recently decreased or stopped for one or more of the major cereals in many of the most intensively cropped areas of the world, including eastern Asia, Europe and the United States,” the researchers said.
According to the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resource, this crop decrease amounts to crop stagnation in 33 percent of major rice-producing countries, and 27 percent of major wheat-producing countries.
In China, wheat crop yield remained constant, but the rate of increase for corn crops has fallen by 64 percent compared to levels 10 years ago. This decrease, the researchers report, comes despite a large investment by China in agricultural research and development, education and infrastructure for both wheat and corn crops. The data suggests that the rate of return on these investments is declining in China, the researchers said.
In a statement, the study authors said that “sustaining further yield gain likely would require fine tuning of many different factors in the production of crops. But this is often difficult to achieve in farmers’ fields and the associated marginal costs, labor requirements, risks and environmental impacts may outweigh the benefits.”
8 Comments on "Global Cereal Crop Production May be Maxed Out on 30 Percent of Farms"
Norm on Sun, 29th Dec 2013 1:38 pm
The article makes no sense. Because everybody knows that food production, population, and economic activity are supposed to increase exponentially, forever.
clueless on Sun, 29th Dec 2013 2:16 pm
norm, apparently you don’t have a university degree, and you’re an idiot.
DC on Sun, 29th Dec 2013 4:01 pm
Apparently, the UoN researchers thought they had a few more doublings or heck, maybe triplings of current production that could pulled out of the hat. The ‘revelation’ that they couldnt, must have come as a shock I am sure. These researchers it is clear from reading this, paid zero attention to the primary input for all the current production, oil and oil-based chemicals. Not once did they mention that future yields will be as dependent on oil(cost and availability) as they will other factors like water, soil health etc.
Kenz300 on Sun, 29th Dec 2013 4:18 pm
Endless population growth is not sustainable… yet the worlds population continues to grow……
Wheeldog on Sun, 29th Dec 2013 10:35 pm
The underbelly of exponential growth is exponential decline. In addition to basic food production we are pushing the limits on the ability of other essential resources to feed the ever-increasing demands of humans. Potable water, waste disposal, fish stocks, healthy air, energy, etc. are being strained by unsustainable demands and abuses. We live in a house of cards.
GregT on Mon, 30th Dec 2013 12:32 am
“The underbelly of exponential growth is exponential decline.”
^^This^^
Or, total collapse. Depending on how much further we manage to overshoot the Earth’s carrying capacity.
Now would be a very smart place to stop. Unfortunately, it would appear that us human beings, aren’t so ‘smart’.
Makati1 on Mon, 30th Dec 2013 1:10 am
Never any mention that the cereals, fruits and veggies we do produce are nutritionally deficient, have been for decades and are getting worse. The trace minerals that the body needs to be healthy are gone from most petrochemical fields around the world. Artificial fertilizers do not replace the ones lost due to intensive farming.
Asia replaced them by returning the human excrement back into the spoil it came from. Ditto most farms returned the animal wastes back into the soil, slowing the loss. Now we strip our fields bare when we harvest and all that goes back are chemicals from a well somewhere.
I enjoy very good heath today and I attribute it to my mother starting me on One-A-Day vitamins and minerals pill when I was only 6 years old (1950). I have maintained that ‘habit’ up until today. My only meds are the daily vitamin/mineral supplement and a baby aspirin.
Pops on Mon, 30th Dec 2013 1:05 pm
“I enjoy very good heath today and I attribute it to my mother starting me on One-A-Day vitamins and minerals pill”
It makes me laugh, literally, that you think the way to cure a nutritionally deficient petrochemical diet is with a petrochemical pill.