Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on February 9, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Europe is Burning More American Coal

Consumption

Natural gas production is booming in the United States. The resulting low natural gas prices are helping the fuel displace other energy sources, most particularly the use of coal to produce electric power. As U.S. demand for coal falls, so has its price and as a result. One big buyer: Europe.

Ironies abound in this Washington Post report on growing European use of coal. The EU has elaborate and costly greenhouse gas regulations while the U.S. has failed to implement any systematic federal greenhouse gas policies. European nations like Germany, Spain, and Denmark are frequently cited as models for their support of renewable energy. And, with these policies in place, greenhouse gas emissions are falling in the United States and Europe is burning more coal. Apparently good intentions are not enough. The Wall Street Journal had a similar report yesterday: “U.S. Coal Finds Warm Embrace Overseas.”

One more point: All that “good news” about reductions in U.S. greenhouse gas emissions is mitigated a bit by tracing through the economic logic. We’ve displaced some coal consumption by increased gas consumption, but much of that coal is simply being burned in Europe or China or elsewhere. U.S. coal production has been relatively flat for two decades, but U.S. coal exports have doubled since the 2006. (See EIA data here.) So we’re cutting emissions, but there will be essentially no climate change pay-off from the cuts. This same consequence would have arisen had the U.S. shifted from coal to natural gas because of carbon taxes or an effective U.S. cap-and-trade scheme (except in that scenario we pay more for energy rather than less. Technological improvements rule!).

knowledgeproblem.com



4 Comments on "Europe is Burning More American Coal"

  1. Arthur on Sat, 9th Feb 2013 2:25 pm 

    The US soon will not have the luxury of exporting any carbon fuel, including coal. Again, the condition of the US in terms of resources is by far not the worst; Europe, totally dependent on Russia and the ME, is far more pressed to do something about the situation… and they do. Hopefully they will not be superseded by time. The US has more potential to contract (saving, rationing, building renewables) before real collapse sets in.

  2. Kenz300 on Sat, 9th Feb 2013 5:45 pm 

    The world needs to stop building any more coal fired power plants if we are to make an impact on Climate Change.

  3. BillT on Sun, 10th Feb 2013 3:08 am 

    As soon as the gas bubble bursts, and it will be soon, the plants in the US will go back to coal. They will ALWAYS use the cheapest energy source. Always.

    The Us is never going to export any form of energy unless it is by means of exploding nuclear bombs. Too much infrastructure to be built before the bubbles burst. Not enough investment capital left in the world to pay for it. Not enough fools out there to even begin.

  4. MrEnergyCzar on Sun, 10th Feb 2013 5:04 am 

    Chindia is still building 500 plants the next few years…

    MrEnergyCzar

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *