Page added on March 22, 2013
For more than a decade, some environmentalists have been warning about “peak oil”. This refers to the point at which global oil production reaches a crescendo before going into inexorable decline. In recent years, there’s also been talk of “peak food”.
Former Vancouver councillor Gordon Price uses a new term—peak car—to describe the growing number of people who are seeking alternatives to the motor vehicle. In a phone interview with the Georgia Straight, the director of SFU’s City Program cited a number of factors, including a slow economy, improved transit, technological change, and generational change.
“The numbers coming out of the States indicate that we reached peak car around 2004,” Price said.
Between 1994 and 2011, there was a 10-percentage-point decline—from 79 percent to 69 percent—in B.C. residents between the ages of 18 and 24 holding driver’s licences, according to ICBC.
Meanwhile, the Seattle-based Sightline Institute’s programs director, Clark Williams-Derry, has tracked the decline of automobile use in a series of articles entitled “Dude, Where Are My Cars?” In October, shortly before the opening of the new Port Mann Bridge, he noted that traffic on the old bridge had been falling steadily since 2005.
“Of course, the province is betting big on long-term traffic growth—they need the cars to show up, since they’re hoping to use toll revenue to pay for their highway-building binge,” Williams-Derry wrote. “But if traffic grows more slowly than they hope, then it’ll take an awful long time for the province to pay for that bridge.”
A recent KPMG report for the City of Vancouver and UBC revealed that the share of trips to the Point Grey campus by motor vehicle fell from 77 percent to 43 percent over a 14-year period, whereas the percentage of trips by transit tripled. And due to the opening of the Canada Line in 2009, transit ridership in the region rose 20 percent in 2010. There was another six-percent hike in 2011, according to TransLink.
This is the backdrop to TransLink’s recently released analyses for rapid-transit alternatives following completion of the Evergreen Line to Coquitlam. Four options have been shortlisted for Surrey.
The first is termed “bus rapid transit”, with one section going east from Surrey City Centre to Guildford along 104 Avenue, and more bus rapid transit travelling south to White Rock along King George Boulevard. A third bus rapid-transit service would leave King George Station and go southeast to Langley along the Fraser Highway. These improvements would cost $900 million and be expected to generate 13,500 more daily transit trips. That’s a relatively small share of the two million daily transit trips in the region projected by 2041.
TransLink defines bus rapid transit this way: “Low-floor articulated buses (running on diesel or electricity) running in their own right-of-way and separated from other traffic by a curb, and with stations located within the street.”
The second option would keep bus rapid transit along King George and 104 Avenue but upgrade to surface-level light rail between King George Station and Langley Centre. That would add 12,500 daily transit trips and cost $1.68 billion, according to TransLink.
A third choice, costing $2.18 billion, would add second and third surface-level light rail lines east along 104 Avenue to Guildford and south along King George Boulevard to Newton, resulting in an additional 12,000 daily trips. This is favoured by Surrey city council.
The fourth option, clocking in at $2.22 billion, would keep bus rapid transit on King George Boulevard and 104 Avenue but upgrade to rail rapid transit—likely SkyTrain—from King George Station to Langley Centre. It would add 24,500 daily transit trips, according to TransLink.
There are also four options on TransLink’s shortlist for UBC. A $1.1-billion surface-level light-rail line from Commercial Drive would add 11,000 weekday transit trips and take 28 minutes to reach the Point Grey campus.
Next on the list is a partially tunnelled light-rail line, which would cost $1.38 billion to $1.84 billion, add 13,500 weekday trips, and arrive at the Point Grey campus in 26 to 27 minutes.
The third option features a subway from VCC–Clark Station to Arbutus complemented by a second light-rail branch from the Main Street–Science World Station. They would connect at Arbutus, with light rail going all the way to UBC, costing $2.67 billion, adding 44,000 weekday trips, and reaching the campus in 29 minutes.
The quickest and most expensive option is a $3-billion mainly tunnelled SkyTrain from VCC–Clark Station to UBC, going under Central Broadway. It would add 54,000 weekday transit trips and get to the campus in 19 minutes. Mayor Gregor Robertson and UBC president Stephen Toope have stated publicly that they favour an underground rail project from Commercial-Broadway to the Point Grey campus.
9 Comments on "Declining car use drives demand for transit"
BillT on Fri, 22nd Mar 2013 2:43 am
Don’t worry, soon there will be no jobs to go to and no money to spend at the malls. Then travel by foot will be all that is necessary.
Arthur on Fri, 22nd Mar 2013 8:22 am
This article illustrates the large buffers the west has to cope with economic contraction. We in western Europe use half of the energy Americans use, but we are fine, relatively, meaning that for Americans there is enormous extra room for contraction before matters really start to hurt. The always funny Fred Reed describes it best how much room there in fact is:
http://lewrockwell.com/reed/reed253.html
DC on Fri, 22nd Mar 2013 12:17 pm
Vancouver is probably one of the better Cities in Canada for understanding the concept of the car is not the end-all-be-all. But, even there, cars dominate the landscape despite the relatively forward thinking local govts. The provincial govt loves big highway projects, especially at election time(ie now), they dont really care much for non-car projects, at all. Massive waves of 3rd world economic migrants, courtesy of the federal govt, and the prov. govt pushing cars-only transportation means even with Vancouvers impressive skytrain and other similar projects, you’ll still spend most of your time suck exhaust through the vents in your gas-burner.
Kenz300 on Fri, 22nd Mar 2013 3:47 pm
As the price of oil continues to rise we will all be looking for ways to save money on our monthly transportation bills.
We will walk more, ride a bicycle more and take mass transit more.
CIties need to become more people friendly rather than car friendly. We need more safe walking and bicycle paths that connect work, schools, homes and businesses. Apartments and businesses need to provide more places for bicycle storage and to safely lock them up when shopping. Bicycles are a great way to travel and the exercise keeps you healthy.
If you need a car to travel longer distances consider some of the ride sharing and car rental options now available in some cities.
GregT on Fri, 22nd Mar 2013 5:08 pm
I currently reside in Vancouver, and can honestly say that this article doesn’t reflect reality. Traffic over the last 10 years has increased exponentially. What used to be a 45 minute commute now takes an hour and 20 minutes, and many of the main arteries into the downtown core are gridlocked on a daily basis.
Traffic congestion in Vancouver, measured by the Tom Tom congestion index in January of this year, was found to be the worst in Canada, and second worst in North America. LA took the top spot and Vancouver was found to be very close behind.
The amount of people aged 18 to 24 not having a driver’s licence is due to high youth unemployment, not the transit system. More young people are living with their parents well into their late 20s, as they simply cannot afford to move out on their own.
What is desperately needed is a mass transit system from the downtown core out into the suburbs in the Fraser Valley, not an underground system along the Broadway corridor. This is being pushed by investors and property developers, and will do nothing but add even more density to an already overpopulated area of the city.
BillT on Sat, 23rd Mar 2013 3:50 am
Here in Manila, there is congestion that most Westerners have never experienced. BUT … most of the vehicles are public transit (buses, taxis, jeepneys, trikes, trucks, and police/fire vehicles. A small percentage are personally owned vehicles. With gas at $5 per gallon and the average labor wage $10 PER DAY, cars will NEVER be important in the average Filipino’s life.
luap on Sat, 23rd Mar 2013 11:41 am
hows the weather there billt …covered in snow here in England..and we are running out of nautral gas…climate change me thinks
luap on Sat, 23rd Mar 2013 11:41 am
hows the weather there billt …covered in snow here in England..and we are running out of nautral gas…climate change me thinks
BillT on Sat, 23rd Mar 2013 11:46 am
luap, It’s always summer here. Nothing below 70F or over 95F. Yes, we get an occasional typhoon, but then, there were hurricanes and blizzards where I used to live, and the temperatures ranged from -15F to 105F. So, I like it here … thank you! ^_^