China and the Middle East, spurred by lower prices and ample supply, will drive global natural gas demand growth in the next 25 years as consumption in Europe fails to recover to peak levels seen in 2010, according to the International Energy Agency.
Both regions will become larger gas users than Europe by 2035, the Paris-based IEA said in its World Energy Outlook 2015. Global demand for gas, a cleaner-burning fuel for power generation than coal, will rise 1.4 percent a year to 5.16 trillion cubic meters (182 trillion cubic feet) in 2040, making it the fastest-growing fossil fuel. The agency forecast 1.6 percent annual growth to 5.38 trillion cubic meters in last year’s World Energy Outlook.
“With gas prices already low in North America, and dragged lower elsewhere by ample supply and contractual linkages to oil prices, there is plenty of competitively priced gas seeking buyers in the early part of the Outlook,” the IEA said.
Gas will account for 24 percent of power generation by 2040, up from 21 percent in 2013, as the share of dirtier coal falls to 30 percent from 41 percent. The fuel is also being used to spare use of oil and back up renewable energy generation.
Price Slump
U.S. futures, used to price contracts for the first liquefied natural gas exports from the shale boom, declined 46 percent over the past year. Exports from the Sabine Pass terminal are scheduled to start early next year, adding to expanding output of the super-chilled fuel from Australia. Brent oil declined 43 percent in the past year, dragging down oil-linked gas contracts.
“These price developments seem set to boost natural gas demand in major importing regions, reinforcing our view that natural gas is a fuel well placed to expand its role in the global energy mix,” the IEA said.
Gas demand in the European members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development will remain little changed at 528 billion cubic meters in 2040, rising 0.1 percent a year from a forecast for 0.7 percent annual growth in last year’s report. China’s consumption is expected to rise 4.7 percent annually, the fastest growth among all regions, to 592 billion cubic meters, the report shows. The Middle East will expand gas use by 2.1 percent a year to 738 billion cubic meters.
Coal Demand
Within the OECD, North America is the only region with significant demand growth, the IEA said. In the U.S., the largest consuming country, gas will displace coal as the largest source of power generation by the mid-2020s. By the early 2030s, it will overtake oil as the most used fuel in the U.S. primary energy mix, the report says.
Global coal demand growth is set to slow to 0.4 percent annually, the report shows. Energy efficiency, competition from renewables, and coal in power generation in some countries may constrain long-term expansion of gas, the IEA said.
Gas use could also be curbed if delayed investments amid lower commodity prices tightens the markets in the 2020s, the report said.
“Emissions of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, along the supply chain will dent the environmental credentials of gas if there is no concerted policy action to tackle these leaks,” the IEA said.
Unconventional Gas
While unconventional gas will make up about 60 percent of supply growth, the spread of projects such as shale-gas plays outside North America will be “more gradual and uneven,” the report said. Global production of shale gas, coalbed methane and tight gas is set to rise to about 1.7 trillion cubic meters in 2040 from 630 billion cubic meters in 2013.
China aims to boost unconventional gas production to more than 250 billion cubic meters by 2040, the report said. Such growth is less certain amid challenges such as geology, limited water availability, population density in some areas, and regulatory issues related to pricing, the IEA said.


Davy on Tue, 8th Dec 2015 7:02 pm
As a doomer I dislike the use of forecast periods like mid 2020’s, 2035, and 2040. These time periods are not legitimate for a growth forecast considering the times we are in. Yet, we see this constantly with energy, population, and growth of all sorts. These type forecast are the hallmark of the status quo and point to a habituation to a view of progress. It is as if it is a mechanized discussion devoid of flesh and blood.
makati1 on Tue, 8th Dec 2015 8:12 pm
2035 … Roaches and rats witness the results of the nuclear exchange of world war three. Nuclear winter has finally offset global warming. There are no humans to see it, but the world is now beginning another cycle to a new ecosystem. The 5th or 6th in it’s long history.
In a few hundred million revolutions around the sun, new life will be spread over a new world, unrecognizable to it’s previous inhabitants. All signs of their existence gone under the relentless work of Mother Nature except for some corroded titanium and stainless steel buried too deep to ever be seen again. All on it’s way to be recycled in the hot core as ocean floors and continents are pulled back down to their origins.
Interesting end for a species that had all the intelligence and resources to go to the stars and live forever … but traded it all for wars, greed and ignorance.
apneaman on Tue, 8th Dec 2015 8:21 pm
Mak, it has taken an about 10 million years for biodiversity to recover after the previous mass extinction events in the planet’s history. In our present form, we have been around for 200,000 years and have done the majority of the damage in the last hundred years or so.
Humans could be among the victims of sixth ‘mass extinction’, scientists warn
“The world is embarking on its sixth mass extinction with animals disappearing about 100 times faster than they used to, scientists warn, and humans could be among the first victims of the next extinction event.
Not since the age of the dinosaurs ended 66 million years ago has the planet been losing species at this rapid a rate, a study led by experts at Stanford University, Princeton University and the University of California, Berkeley said.”
“And the study, which was published in the journal Science Advances on Friday and described by its authors as “conservative”, said humans were likely to be among the species lost.
“If it is allowed to continue, life would take many millions of years to recover and our species itself would likely disappear early on,” lead author Gerardo Ceballos of the Universidad Autonoma de Mexico said.”
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-20/sixth-mass-extinction-impact-humans-study-says/6560700
makati1 on Tue, 8th Dec 2015 8:54 pm
Ap, true but I think a totally devastating, life killing, nuclear war would take longer to recover. Perhaps it would just mutate whatever survives into the new system?
I read SF for pleasure and it has opens my mind to a lot of possibilities I would never have thought of on my own. If you ever read Dune, you would recognize bits of the Muslim faith in the Fremen. I have read about hundreds of possible lifestyles and locations and it is truly liberating.
I even wrote one myself which will never be published commercially as I do not want the IRS bullshit to deal with. It needs a final edit and then I will get some printed and bound as gifts for my family and friends.
For those who poopoo SF as a waste consider:
http://www.inc.com/jeff-haden/9-ways-reading-fiction-can-make-you-happier-and-more-creative.html?cid=sf01002&sr_share=facebook
apneaman on Tue, 8th Dec 2015 9:01 pm
Mak, when we drive animals to extinction they can no longer can provide important ecosystem services, like transporting nutrients. Kill off enough of them and you get a dead planet. We could find 3 new Gwar fields tomorrow and it will not change that basic fact of biology. All the money and energy in the world can not undo the damage we’ve done. Only our disappearance and geological time.
Global nutrient transport in a world of giants
“Significance
Animals play an important role in the transport of nutrients, but this role has diminished because many of the largest animals have gone extinct or experienced massive population declines. Here, we quantify the movement of nutrients by animals in the land, sea, rivers, and air both now and prior to their widespread reductions. The capacity to move nutrients away from hotspots decreased to 6% of past values across land and ocean. The vertical movement of phosphorus (P) by marine mammals was reduced by 77% and movement of P from sea to land by seabirds and anadromous fish was reduced by 96%, effectively disrupting an efficient nutrient distribution pump that once existed from the deep sea to the continental interiors.”
http://m.pnas.org/content/early/2015/10/23/1502549112.abstract
apneaman on Tue, 8th Dec 2015 9:06 pm
Mak, total war on a global scale will not be a surprise. Who knows how long it would take life to recover from thousands of nuclear explosions or if it ever would.
makati1 on Tue, 8th Dec 2015 9:41 pm
Ap, it would likely be no worse than other extinction events in the past. As you said, only the time to rebuild will vary. One extinction event took about one billion years to recover, but the earth has about 7-8 billion years before the sun goes nova and ends it all, permanently. Or so it is theorized from observation and research.
As for the ecosystem and animals, yes, the ignorance of the system that we need to stay alive is allowing all of our supports to be cut, burned, poisoned, and heated out of existence. The term “Ignorance is Bliss” could just as easily be “Ignorance is suicide”.
makati1 on Tue, 8th Dec 2015 9:46 pm
BTW: For all the China bashers in our group…
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2015/12/07/beijing-air-quality-china-pollution/76924786/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=usatoday-newstopstories
Top 20 are in India(13), Pakistan(3), Qatar(1), Turkey(1), Iran(1) and Bangladesh(1).