Page added on December 14, 2014
China’s GDP has grown 670% from $1.2 trillion at the beginning of the century to $9.24 trillion in 2013. That’s mind-numbingly fast growth. Perhaps the only thing more amazing is how the country has accomplished the feat: with the help from coal, a lot of coal. Some estimates demonstrate that China has had to build at least one new coal power per week to fuel growth, which is backed up by the fact that nearly 80% of all electricity generated there comes from coal (compared to just 39% in the United States).
However, after recently agreeing to peak carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 or sooner, economists quickly realized that China would need to reach peak coal usage well before then. No surprise, then, that Beijing announced last month that coal use would peak by 2020. In fact, some provinces will be required to cut production by 99% by the end of the decade to reach a combination of new pollution and renewable energy standards. Although necessary to reach carbon dioxide emissions targets, turning away from coal creates uncertainties for power generation in China after 2020.
After accounting for coal and hydropower projects, all other energy sources account for just 12% of installed electricity capacity combined. In other words, the growth needed in renewables, natural gas, and nuclear could create big opportunities for investors to exploit. Here we’ll consider if China’s virtually untapped shale gas reserves can find the overnight growth needed to fill the void left from peaking coal, and whether Chinese companies such as PetroChina Company (NYSE: PTR ) or established multinationals such as Chevron (NYSE: CVX ) and Royal Dutch Shell represent the wiser potential investment?
Shale gas revolution, part 2?
Energy investors are well-aware of the American energy boom that was ignited by accessing shale oil and gas, but China, not the United States, actually has the largest recoverable shale gas reserves in the world. Progress has been slow, as nearly all of the nation’s production currently comes from conventional sources, but Beijing has big ambitions for its shale reserves — which will be needed to match its growing consumption.

Early production in shale basins has proven difficult — and frustrated the likes of Royal Dutch Shell and Chevron — for several reasons. First, tricky geology. China’s reserves are deeper than those found in the United States and require new fracturing fluid formulations to break through its unique rock compositions. Additionally, large sections of the shale fields are in mountainous terrain prone to seismic activity. The latter has fragmented the recoverable reserves, which will reduce the effectiveness of current horizontal drilling techniques.
Second, supporting infrastructure such as vast pipeline networks is still being developed in China. Even if companies could produce large volumes of gas, they would be hard-pressed to move it around efficiently.
Third, China has only begun investing in recovering shale gas in the last few years. Early projects and exploration have taught the domestic industry (1) much more investment is required, and (2) they’ll likely need America’s help.
Is home-grown technology enough?
The Chinese government has been keen to cultivate joint ventures between its largest energy firms. For instance, one was recently announced between PetroChina Company, chemical manufacturer Sinochem, and a state-owned development company. The partners have invested $4 billion to develop wells across 6,000 square miles in Chongqing, the nation’s most productive shale field so far, which will begin production in 2017. The field is believed to hold nearly 8% of the nation’s total reserves.
Of course, the $4 billion investment will be swamped by future investments required to develop productive fields, lay pipelines, and build processing facilities. That reality has kept initial nationwide production goals low. China expects to grow annual shale gas production to 1,059 billion cubic feet (30 billion cubic meters) by 2020. That pales in comparison to the 3,800 billion cubic feet currently produced from other sources. By comparison, the United States produced 11,415 billion cubic feet (323 billion cubic meters) of shale gas in 2013.

Only 3% of China’s installed capacity is derived from natural gas, compared to 66% from coal. Source: EIA.
In other words, there’s a long, long way to go before China reaches its potential in natural gas — and it certainly won’t occur by 2020. If it really wants to expedite its arrival as a global leader in shale technology it may need to seek help from multinational drillers that have experience in Bakken, Marcellus, and Eagle Ford fields.
Outside investments needed, but…
It’s not surprising that China is attempting to develop its own technologies and companies to tap into domestic shale gas reserves. And it hasn’t kept more established players out, either, although outside investments have resulted in disappointing results to date. For instance, Chevron owns 49% of a $6.4 billion project that will sport an annual capacity of 424 billion cubic feet (12 billion cubic meters). The project was delayed by five years thanks to the challenging geography and isn’t expected to come online until 2015 at the earliest.
Royal Dutch Shell saw similarly challenging geography slash its expectations for a project with China National Petroleum Company, the first sharing contract signed in China, from major investment to afterthought. The company blamed geography and the dense population for its dampened goals, which essentially demonstrated that the company has better investment opportunities available.
What does it mean for investors?
While outside investments have had difficulty early on, the demand for cheap and relatively clean energy is too large and the volumes of shale gas too enticing for China to not develop the necessary technologies. In the current environment, however, there’s simply no shortage of competitive global energy investments to be made, which allows Chevron and Royal Dutch Shell to pass on challenging Chinese production for now. Expect them to come knocking again when better technologies are developed, but don’t expect Chinese shale gas to represent an major investing opportunity anytime soon.
5 Comments on "Can China’s Shale Gas Help It Reach Peak Coal by 2020?"
JuanP on Sun, 14th Dec 2014 8:32 am
The Chinese will reach peak coal when they can’t possibly burn more than the day before. Anyone who expects the Chinese to reduce their emissions voluntarily is engaging in mental masturbation.
The world keeps consuming resources and polluting more and more everyday. This will only change when we are forced to change. We will burn every tree and blade of grass, too, before we are done.
“Total destruction is the only solution” Bob Marley
Kenz300 on Sun, 14th Dec 2014 9:48 am
China has started to make pollution control issues a priority. The people are demanding change. The politicians are responding.
China is the worlds largest investor in renewable energy. Their commitment to wind and solar grows every year. They are also making huge investments in electric vehicles and mass transit.
China is switching to renewables to help clear the air but it also sees a huge business opportunity in being a leader in clean energy and selling products and technology around the developing world.
——————–
John Kerry: Our Historic Agreement With China on Climate Change – NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/12/opinion/john-kerry-our-historic-agreement-with-china-on-climate-change.html?emc=edit_th_20141112&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=21372621
———————
Asia Pushes Hard for Clean Energy
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/business/energy-environment/asia-pushes-hard-for-clean-energy.html?action=click&contentCollection=Asia Pacific®ion=Footer&module=MoreInSection&pgtype=article
Speculawyer on Sun, 14th Dec 2014 1:19 pm
The lack of emissions controls in China has actually turned out to be a big benefit to the world. China could solve much of their local pollution problems by installing strict pollution control systems on their coal plants. But instead, it looks like the are going to push hard to just reduce coal usage in general which will help reduce local pollution AND reduce greenhouse gases. So that is good. Build nukes, solar, natural gas, geothermal, and wind!
I kinda wonder if we would not have had such a climate change problem if the automobile catalytic converter had never been invented.
Davy on Sun, 14th Dec 2014 2:54 pm
Spec, there is little chance of China reducing coal. To date most of their AltE, NUK, and Hydro efforts got swallowed up by growth. There is little left they can do but get some more gas from Russia. We know gas is not much better than coal. The real change will come when China’s growth ends. Serious problems are just beneath the surface in China ready to explode. It is a very serious situation that has been repressed for far too long. Hug mal-investment, bad debt extend and pretend, shadow banking excesses, rehypothecation scandals, and 25 trillion in credit creation. China is a country of mega cities with a destroyed environment. China’s cities will depopulate into a countryside that is nothing but a huge brownfield site. Tell me how they are going to grow food in abandoned factory sites. IMA factory sites with little regard for pollution control. China’s water situation is no better with much of the countries scarce water resources degraded. Tell me how this sentences can point to anything good ecologically:
China’s GDP has grown 670% from $1.2 trillion at the beginning of the century to $9.24 trillion in 2013.
surf on Sun, 14th Dec 2014 3:49 pm
Prior to 2005 china had zero wind on it’s grid. Today china installs about 15 GW of wind capacity every year. Yearly wind production is now over 100 GWH per year. They install more wind in one year than anyone else and wind installations are occurring faster than nuclear in china.
Total insalled 2013 capacity in china is
Coal 801 GW
Hydro 208 GW
Wind 91 GW
Natural gas and Biomas (combined) 61 GW
Solar 18GW
Nuclear 15.7GW
TOTAL 1247 GW
Hydro, windand solar are outpacing all other new additions. I doubt china could increase production fast enough to make any significant impact on its power production. In fact prower produciton from Coal, oil, natural gas and biomass will probably slowly drop as renewables. plus nuclear take more and more of the load. Increasing strict pollution laws will accelerate the transition to renewables.
At present growth rates of renewables plus nuclear it china will need 25 years to eliminate fossil fuel use in electricity production. If they can increase solar to the current wind installation rate they will need less that 20 years. Add in the growth of high speed rail and the switch to electric cars and oil coal might be small players in china’s economy within our lifetime.