Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on June 16, 2014

Bookmark and Share

BP: US Beats China’s Oil Demand Growth in 2013

BP: US Beats China’s Oil Demand Growth in 2013 thumbnail

Oil demand in the United States grew at the fastest pace in the world in 2013, outstripping China for the first time since 1999 as the globe’s top economy reaped the benefits of a shale boom, oil company BP said on Monday.

In its annual review of energy statistics unveiled in Moscow, BP also raised its global oil reserves estimate by 1.1 percent after revising U.S. reserves upwards by more than a quarter.

Global natural gas reserves were cut for a second year as lower provisions for Russia and Qatar offset a significant uptick in U.S. estimates.

BP also said the United States recorded its largest-ever annual rise in oil production for a second year in a row with a 13.5 percent increase to above 10 million barrels per day (bpd).

The annual review, first published in 1951 and considered an industry benchmark, showed U.S. oil consumption in 2013 grew by 400,000 bpd to 18.9 million bpd, the sharpest gain in the world, followed by China’s rise of 390,000 bpd to 10.8 million bpd.

The consumption growth was led by an expansion of the U.S. industrial sector as the world’s top economy emerged from the 2008 financial crisis, BP Chief Economist Christof Ruhl said.

At the same time, a Chinese slowdown was driven mainly by lower consumption of diesel and gasoil, which traditionally reflect the rate of economic growth.

“It is easy to understand the U.S. – If you have a lot of cheap domestic oil that feeds into the industry, it will show up eventually in GDP growth numbers. It’s not that easy to reconcile the slowdown in Chinese energy numbers,” Ruhl said.

China’s economic growth hit a 14-year low in 2013, a decline that accelerated in the first part of this year as Beijing leads a wide drive to reform the country’s economy.

Overall, China’s energy consumption growth slowed to around 4.7 percent in 2013 from a 10-year average of 8.4 percent despite the fact that Beijing officially reported a 7.7 percent rise in gross domestic product last year, Ruhl said.

“There is a lot of tension between the official growth numbers for China and the official energy consumption numbers for China,” he said.

Global oil production – up 560,000 bpd, or 0.6 percent – failed to keep pace with growth in oil consumption. Output disruptions from Libya, Nigeria and Iraq due to political strife were almost entirely offset by growth of 1.1 million bpd in U.S. output, BP said.

“The huge investments seen in the U.S. have been encouraged and enabled by a favourable policy regime. And this has resulted in the U.S. delivering the world’s largest increase in oil production last year. Indeed, the U.S. increase … was one of the biggest annual oil production increases the world has ever seen,” Ruhl said.

This balance also explains oil price stability over the past three years, with the lowest volatility since the early 1970s, he said.

Reserves

BP raised its estimate of global proved oil reserves by 1.1 percent to 1,687.9 billion barrels at the end of 2013, enough to meet 53.3 years of current global production.

U.S. reserves estimates were increased by 26 percent to 44.2 billion barrels, and Russia’s by 6.7 percent to 93 billion barrels.

The company cut its estimate of global reserves of natural gas for a second year in a row to 185.7 trillion cubic metres (tcm), enough to meet 54.8 years of global production.

The decline by less than 1 percent was mostly due to Russia, where reserves estimates were reduced by 4.9 percent to 31.3 tcm, the BP data showed.

– See more at: http://www.rigzone.com/news/oil_gas/a/133566/BP_US_Beats_Chinas_Oil_Demand_Growth_in_2013/?all=HG2#sthash.mv8P7NNC.dpuf

Oil demand in the United States grew at the fastest pace in the world in 2013, outstripping China for the first time since 1999 as the globe’s top economy reaped the benefits of a shale boom, oil company BP said on Monday.

In its annual review of energy statistics unveiled in Moscow, BP also raised its global oil reserves estimate by 1.1 percent after revising U.S. reserves upwards by more than a quarter.

Global natural gas reserves were cut for a second year as lower provisions for Russia and Qatar offset a significant uptick in U.S. estimates.

BP also said the United States recorded its largest-ever annual rise in oil production for a second year in a row with a 13.5 percent increase to above 10 million barrels per day (bpd).

The annual review, first published in 1951 and considered an industry benchmark, showed U.S. oil consumption in 2013 grew by 400,000 bpd to 18.9 million bpd, the sharpest gain in the world, followed by China’s rise of 390,000 bpd to 10.8 million bpd.

The consumption growth was led by an expansion of the U.S. industrial sector as the world’s top economy emerged from the 2008 financial crisis, BP Chief Economist Christof Ruhl said.

At the same time, a Chinese slowdown was driven mainly by lower consumption of diesel and gasoil, which traditionally reflect the rate of economic growth.

“It is easy to understand the U.S. – If you have a lot of cheap domestic oil that feeds into the industry, it will show up eventually in GDP growth numbers. It’s not that easy to reconcile the slowdown in Chinese energy numbers,” Ruhl said.

China’s economic growth hit a 14-year low in 2013, a decline that accelerated in the first part of this year as Beijing leads a wide drive to reform the country’s economy.

Overall, China’s energy consumption growth slowed to around 4.7 percent in 2013 from a 10-year average of 8.4 percent despite the fact that Beijing officially reported a 7.7 percent rise in gross domestic product last year, Ruhl said.

“There is a lot of tension between the official growth numbers for China and the official energy consumption numbers for China,” he said.

Global oil production – up 560,000 bpd, or 0.6 percent – failed to keep pace with growth in oil consumption. Output disruptions from Libya, Nigeria and Iraq due to political strife were almost entirely offset by growth of 1.1 million bpd in U.S. output, BP said.

“The huge investments seen in the U.S. have been encouraged and enabled by a favourable policy regime. And this has resulted in the U.S. delivering the world’s largest increase in oil production last year. Indeed, the U.S. increase … was one of the biggest annual oil production increases the world has ever seen,” Ruhl said.

This balance also explains oil price stability over the past three years, with the lowest volatility since the early 1970s, he said.

Reserves

BP raised its estimate of global proved oil reserves by 1.1 percent to 1,687.9 billion barrels at the end of 2013, enough to meet 53.3 years of current global production.

U.S. reserves estimates were increased by 26 percent to 44.2 billion barrels, and Russia’s by 6.7 percent to 93 billion barrels.

The company cut its estimate of global reserves of natural gas for a second year in a row to 185.7 trillion cubic metres (tcm), enough to meet 54.8 years of global production.

The decline by less than 1 percent was mostly due to Russia, where reserves estimates were reduced by 4.9 percent to 31.3 tcm, the BP data showed.
/BP_US_Beats_Chinas_Oil_Demand_Growth_in_2013″>RIGZONE



11 Comments on "BP: US Beats China’s Oil Demand Growth in 2013"

  1. nemteck on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 2:53 pm 

    “…. global proved oil reserves by 1.1 percent to 1,687.9 billion barrels”. Saudi claims reserves of 267 Billion, that leaves about 1.421 Trillion barrels,that are 5.3 complete Saudi Arabia. Where is that oil? Not on Mars I hope.

    Of course, there is a difference between reserves and recoverable oil.

  2. Perk Earl on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 3:18 pm 

    “U.S. oil consumption in 2013 grew by 400,000 bpd to 18.9 million bpd, the sharpest gain in the world, followed by China’s rise of 390,000 bpd to 10.8 million bpd.”

    What happened to ‘peak demand’?

    What happened to alternative fuel vehicles and EV’s reducing ICE’s fuel from oil demand?

  3. ghung on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 3:34 pm 

    ….and, excepting a recent run up, the price of WTI has barely budged.

  4. westexas on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 5:23 pm 

    Perhaps they are looking at a different BP data set, but the one I am looking at shows that US 2013 liquids consumption increased by 2% over 2012, while China’s consumption increased by 3.8%.

  5. westexas on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 5:30 pm 

    I see that they are talking about the increase in the volume of US consumption slightly exceeding the increase in the volume of Chinese consumption.

    The following chart shows normalized liquids consumption for China, India, the (2005) Top 33 net oil exporters and the US from 2002 to 2012 (2002 values = 100%), versus annual Brent crude oil prices. China was at 204% for 2013, while the US was at 96%. Brent averaged $108.

    I suspect that the 2013 data will show that China and India continued to consume an increasing share of a post-2005 declining volume of Global Net Exports of oil.

    http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i475/westexas/Slide14_zpsb2fe0f1a.jpg

  6. DMyers on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 6:28 pm 

    “The consumption growth was led by an expansion of the U.S. industrial sector as the world’s top economy emerged from the 2008 financial crisis, BP Chief Economist Christof Ruhl said.”

    Does anyone believe: the part where the industrial sector is coming on strong, or the part about our being the world’s top economy, or that we have emerged from the 2008 crisis? I don’t see these things taking place, although someone might find a way to manipulate the numbers to make it look that way. Wait, I take that back. We might be the world’s top debtor economy.

    What remains unsaid and unspeakable is that this 400,000 bpd uptick is a mystery. It may not be a large percentage, but it does signify a good deal of activity of one sort or another. Which brings me to my point. There is a good deal of energy consuming activity going on that we know nothing about.

  7. Makati1 on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 8:02 pm 

    First, it’s RIGZONE.

    Second, ALL statistics in today’s world are mostly fiction and to be taken with a grain of salt.

    Third, 70+% of our US GDP is services, not industry, so how can we be growing? US industries are still closing or moving to other countries.

    More ‘feel good’ porn from RIGZONE.

  8. Davey on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 8:57 pm 

    Mak, better situation than China who is mass producing landfill material and in the process destroying Asia ecosystem. At least our air is clean relative to Asia. Our industry in value added not low cost cheap Asia variety.

  9. rockman on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 11:11 pm 

    Nem: “Of course, there is a difference between reserves and recoverable oil.” Actually there is no difference per se simply because “reserve” has no specific definition. IOW it can be used anyway someone wishes to quantify it. The closest you can come to a meaning full set of definitions is to study the SEC protocol. Here’s some “light reading” if you have the patience for it:
    http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/oilandgas-interp.htm

    Categories – PDP reserves: proved developed production. PND: proved non-producing (we’re sure it’s there but don’t have any wells in it capable of producing). Probable reserves. Possible reserves. Discovered PIIP (proved initially in place). One of my personal favorites: Undiscovered PIIP. PBP teserves: proved behind pipe (we know it’s there and have cased wells thru it but are producing other reservoirs in the well first). And the there are the PNP and PDP sub-commercial reserves as well as the PNP and PDP non-commercial reserves. Yes: I have produced a number of wells that contained an unprofitable amount of hydrocarbons that I would not have drilled had I known the number. But once I spent the bulk of the money to get to a completion decision the cost of bring the well on line made thy decision possible. There are a fair number of shale wells that re producing proved reserves but will never recover their total invest

    And then you can swing out to other stats like “exploratory reserves” and the ever popular “resources” categories.

  10. rockman on Mon, 16th Jun 2014 11:15 pm 

    Sent too soon: …will never recover their total investment but the reserves are still counted as PDP: proved developed producing.

    But even when someone tosses out a number for PDP reserves you still need to dig deeper to find out if they are using SEC protocols or making up their own.

  11. Jerry L on Tue, 17th Jun 2014 1:47 am 

    All this make me feel that we are driving faster and faster towards the cliff. Ideally the increase in production is being used to produce a massively more energy-efficient infrastructure and an improved renewable-energy infrastructure. Why don’t I think this is the case?
    To an old forester like me 53 years is not a long time. Plant a forest stand today for harvesting in say 80 years. Harvest and transport with what: Horses, wood fired steam engines?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *