Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on December 16, 2013

Bookmark and Share

As America enjoys cheap gas, Asia’s top buyers to pay more

Consumption

* Already paying world’s highest gas prices, Asia buyers set to pay more

* LNG contracts being renegotiated as demand outpaces supply in region

* Cheap U.S. shale gas yet to make it onto global markets

Asia’s biggest economies face paying twice as much for some natural gas as old supply deals are renewed, with a North American shale glut years from helping to meet soaring demand in the region.

Rocketing prices will add billions of dollars to the power bills of Asian nations and threaten competitiveness, but mean an earnings bonanza for LNG producers such as Malaysia’s Petronas , BP and Australia’s Woodside Petroleum .

Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and China bought 70 percent of global liquefied natural gas supplies last year. They can spend five times as much for the super-chilled fuel as U.S. buyers pay for piped gas.

While shale gas floods the United States, gas demand in Asia has outstripped supply, in part because the world’s two largest buyers, Japan and South Korea, are buying more cargoes to make up for power lost from their crippled nuclear energy sectors.

And as decades-old Asian supply contracts come up for renegotiation, some producers are angling to double prices, a threat to economies heavily dependent on imported energy. That’s got hard-pressed purchasers pushing to form a buyers’ club to boost their bargaining power.

“We are importing energy with the money that we earn by selling semiconductors, steel and ships. As much as energy import costs rise, it will hit our international balance of payments as well as our economy,” said Yang-hoon Sonn, President & CEO of state-run Korea Energy Economics Institute.

South Korea faces one of the most immediate price rises as it renegotiates contracts with suppliers in Malaysia, Yemen and Russia, which account for nearly a quarter of its gas imports.

Accepting that higher prices are inevitable, Korea Gas Corp (KOGAS), the world’s largest corporate buyer of LNG, is now simply in a race to get a better deal than other importers in the region, company sources said.

LNG makes up around half of South Korea’s energy bill of about 25 trillion won ($24 billion) a year, while only supplying a fifth of its power.

South Korea has LNG contracts for 7.5 million tonnes per year with Malaysia’s Tiga LNG, Russia’s Sakhalin, and Yemen LNG.

When the deals were struck at the turn of the century, gas was cheap and still shedding its image as a by-product of oil production, often burned or “flared” on site.

LNG prices into Japan — a benchmark for Asia — were under $5 per million British thermal units (mmBtu) in 2000, compared with $19 per mmBtu on the spot market now .

“It was a buyers’ market in the early 2000s when we had signed the deals, ” the KOGAS source told Reuters.

WAVE OF PRICE HIKES

Long-term LNG contract prices are typically calculated as a percentage of oil prices. Some contracts signed years ago were agreed at 10 percent of the oil price or lower and have stuck sellers with prices far below the current spot market rate.

KOGAS has paid an average of $8.25 and $6.05 per million British thermal units (mmbtu) for Yemeni and Russian LNG, respectively, this year, a big discount to the average of $14.84 for overall purchases due to long term contracts locked in years ago with both suppliers.

Customs data show that South Korea paid $15.91 per mmBtu for Malaysian LNG in October, nearly double the $8.41 it paid last year, a jump mostly due to buying more supplies on the spot market, according to sources.

Japanese utilities are likely to face the same fate next year when prices on several supply contracts with Australia’s Woodside Petroleum are renegotiated.

LNG accounts for about 60 percent of Japan’s spending on thermal fuel for power generation while providing nearly 43 percent of its electricity.

Woodside expects the prices it receives for LNG to move toward the Japanese average of around $15 per mmBtu. Some of its lowest priced contracts are around $8 per mmBtu, analysts say.

The jump in contract prices could boost its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) and before exploration by more than a $1 billion, according to Citigroup.

Woodside declined to comment.

China’s CNOOC also faces pressure from BP to raise the long-term contract price for gas from its Indonesian project, which is currently under $4 per mmBtu, to market prices.

SELLER’S MARKET

Soaring prices in Asia are in sharp contrast to the cheap gas in North America, which has yet to reach global markets.

Even when U.S. gas exports start later this decade, prices may be only slightly cheaper — after accounting for liquefaction and shipping — than existing LNG supplies.

Gas suppliers clearly have the upper hand in negotiations in Asia, at least for the next few years.

“I wouldn’t like to be renegotiating now because it is certainly a seller’s market,” said Tony Regan, an analyst with energy consultancy Tri Zen International.

Yemen LNG has opened negotiations with an offer of 15 percent of the oil price, above recent rates of 14 to 14.5 percent, according to one source.

While that may be optimistic, it is not out of the realm of possibility, said analysts.

“It’s difficult to see right now, in the next two or three years, where any major downward pressure is going to come from,” said Gavin Thompson, Wood Mackenzie’s head analyst for Asia-Pacific gas and power.

Reuters



6 Comments on "As America enjoys cheap gas, Asia’s top buyers to pay more"

  1. rockman on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 12:39 am 

    Cheap vs. cheaper? Might sound a bit of a semantic argument but consider it from a dynamic view point. If NG prices in the US suddenly rose to Asian levels how would our economy respond? Just my guess but given how the economy reacted when in 2008 prices rose to just 60% of current Asian prices I would suspect it would have a crippling effect especially for electricity buyers whose fuel source was NG. So maybe a better point is cheap vs. affordable. Obviously $17/mmBtu is affordable for those Asian buyers currently buying the LNG. They may not enjoy paying that price and it may have a variety of negative effects. But, none the less, they are still buying. IOW it’s affordable. But how much NG would be consumed in the US if prices rose over 400%? I suspect US consumption would plunge. IOW it $17/mmBtu might not be cheap for Asia buyers but appears to be more affordable for them then it would be for US consumers.

  2. BillT on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 12:52 am 

    Be patient. Asian prices are coming to America soon, one way or another. The Fed is juggling out-of-control financial chain saws and if they make one slip …

  3. Dave Thompson on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 2:54 am 

    Depending on how long the US production blip of the past 2? 3? years goes on I think the usury, money changer, petrol corporations, are going to keep up the facade for as long as the US production numbers do.

  4. eugene on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 2:14 pm 

    US is being stupid as usual. Continuing our cheap energy economy is not smart as we are simply digging the hole deeper instead of starting the adjustment. Makes me think of when I was a drunk. Late at night, most have gone home and I am desperately to keep the party going. In the morning they wake up more rested, far less hungover and much more capable of functioning.

  5. rockman on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 2:52 pm 

    Eugene – Excellent analogy IMHO. But US politicians are unwilling to put the country on a 12 step program for a good reason: they want to stay in office. I come from a family of drunks and know that the first step is admitting you have a problem. What’s worse is our political system isn’t not just acting as an AA sponsor but behaving more as an enabler. No drunk ever got off the booze when their friends kept offering last call…time and time again.

    And though it sounds like I’m hanging it on the politicians it ultimately falls on the public. The politicians and oil patch function exactly as the great majority of the public demands. If they didn’t the public wouldn’t hesitate to punish them. If either President Obama or ExxonMobil were to try to radically change the current dynamic the public would revolt.

  6. GregT on Mon, 16th Dec 2013 4:15 pm 

    The morning is coming, whether the public demands that the party continues on, or not.

    Judging from recent media stories, the government is already making preparations, for the revolt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *