Page added on January 31, 2018
A letter in a November 1999 edition of the Oil & Gas Journal, “Running Out of Oil,” written by an industry consultant, stated 11 facts and predictions. Far from unusual, his facts were generally correct and his prognostications mainstream.
U.S. oil production was in decline in the 1990s. Oil imports were rising. This led George W. Bush to declare in his 2006 State of the Union Address: “America is addicted to oil.”
Until around 2010, in fact, “Peak Oil” was in vogue both inside and outside the industry. Pro-oil voices urged greater public-land access and less regulation to increase otherwise declining production; anti-oil voices favored government subsidies and mandates to fashion a post-petroleum future.
The aforementioned letter (by Jeffrey Hughes, President and founder of HTK Consultants) offered these facts and predictions circa 1999:
The letter ended by predicting that the U.S. would have to “import over 85 percent of its oil in the next 10-15 years.”
In 2016, net petroleum imports to the United States were 24 percent of domestic consumption. Net imports that peaked in 2005 at 12.5 billion barrels have fallen since, with 2016 registering 4.8 billion barrels. The results for 2017 (not yet finalized) could bring the percentage under 20 percent for the first time since the mid-1960s.
And here are the updated facts from the world of 1999.
World oil discoveries peaked in 1964 at about 70 billion barrels.
Since then, yearly additions have recently averaged 9 billion barrels (2000-2015). Explorers in 2017 discovered the lowest volume of oil since at least the 1940s, according to Rystad Energy, an oil and gas consultancy.
This said, global reserves have increased significantly from additions to existing fields, the result of new technology (see points below).
Approximately 72 million barrels per day was produced in 1999, which increased 12 percent to 81 million barrels per day in 2009.
From the 2009 level, 2016’s output rose 14 percent to 92 million barrels per day—the highest ever.
Domestic oil production peaked in 1970 at 9.6 million barrels per day. After dipping to a low of 5 million barrels per day in 2008, 2015 output was 9.4 million barrels per day, the highest since 1972 and nearly a 90 percent increase from the 2008 low.
In 2018, the U.S. is expected to break its 1970 record for oil production.
In 2016, net petroleum imports were 24 percent of U.S. oil consumption, a 60 percent decline from the above amount.
Imports from Saudi Arabia fell from 1.5 million to 1.1 million barrels per day between 1999 and 2016, a 25 percent decline. Total OPEC imports fell from 4.2 million to 3.2 million barrels in the same period, a 25 percent drop.
In 2016, 72 percent of world oil reserves were in OPEC, led by Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. But with technically recoverable oil, the U.S. exceeds all of OPEC (1.44 trillion barrels vs. 1.22 trillion barrels).
This is no longer the case. Saudi Arabia’s 2016 proved reserves of 266 billion barrels compares to 486 billion barrels for non-OPEC.
At year-end 2016, world oil reserves were estimated to be 1.7 trillion barrels, a 65 percent increase from the above despite interim consumption of 565 billion barrels.
In 2016, 2.4 billion barrels from new fields of conventional oil were discovered worldwide, down from the average of the last 15 years of 9 billion barrels. However, additions to reserves in existing fields have allowed total reserves to grow significantly (see below).
In 2016, world oil usage of 35 billion barrels was 35 percent higher than the above figure. By 2050, oil consumption is forecast to reach over 44 billion barrels.
Predictions from 1999, in retrospect, were far too pessimistic about the global oil market and the U.S. in particular. The last decade has been among the most prolific in the history of the petroleum industry—and centered right here in America. Human ingenuity, what Julian Simon labeled “the ultimate resource,” has prevailed over the alleged limits to nature.
A month before Hughes’s letter, the economics editor of the Oil & Gas Journal, Robert Beck, predicted that “additional demand for crude oil will have to be satisfied primarily by increased production from OPEC countries, because that is where the vast majority of the world’s oil reserves lie,” in the article “Resurgent Oil Demand, OPEC Cohesion Set Stage for Optimistic Outlook for Oil Industry at the Turn of the Century.” Again, this was the conventional wisdom.
But Beck’s boss was less sure. “Plenty of fluid hydrocarbon remains,” wrote Oil & Gas Journal editor Bob Tippee in his article titled “How an Institution Responds to the Turn of a Millennium” the month after Hughes’s letter. “And OGJ will continue publishing the best material available about the space-age innovations that keep pushing exhaustion of an undeniably finite resource further into the future than anyone seems able to imagine.”
Tippee was sage. More “space age innovation” has happened than could have been imagined. Excitement about 3-D technology and horizontal drilling in the 1990s was but a precursor to what today is a U.S./global oil and gas production boom from hydraulic fracturing, a story told elsewhere.*
The Oil Age, 150 years old, may still be young. Peak-oil predictions made in the second half of the 19th century, and throughout the 20th century, all assumed a nonentrepreneurial world instead of one in which innovation and discovery open the door to more. Resources, after all, are not fixed but created by resourceship, particularly in private property, free-market settings.
58 Comments on "A New, Unanticipated Oil World"
JuanP on Fri, 2nd Feb 2018 7:29 pm
Micromind, You accuse others of posting propaganda and then you post links to the WSJ? I guess for you the WSJ is not propaganda! You are irredeemably stupid! LOL! Do you believe in the NYT, WP, and CNN, too? What a friggin moron you are!
MASTERMIND on Fri, 2nd Feb 2018 7:44 pm
Kick rocks JuanP! And go dry off your back!
Anonymouse1 on Fri, 2nd Feb 2018 7:51 pm
Mushmind > the ‘exceptionalist’. Some know it as ‘davytard’. Its his alternate personality disorder come to life, as it were. A way for him to act up and out, w/o anyone being the wiser. Well, that was his theory at any rate.
JuanP on Fri, 2nd Feb 2018 8:06 pm
Micromind, You almost got your gold star for writing a comment without mistakes, but not quite. Still, I will give you a silver star for you to show to your mommy because you wrote two sentences and only made one mistake. Congratulations! LOL! If you figure out what your mistake was I will upgrade your reward to a gold star so that your mommy can be really proud of her little retard. I will give you a clue, too. You made a punctuation mistake. Go for it! LOL!
Davy on Fri, 2nd Feb 2018 8:08 pm
mouse1, are you unable to say anything intelligent? Did you finally fail to become an engineer and now all it is for you on a Friday night is tasteless and goofy internet forum attacks. Are you too ugly and stupid to have a girlfriend? What a worthless life.
MASTERMIND on Fri, 2nd Feb 2018 8:26 pm
Hey Davy notice that I have royally pissed off Greg and Madkat both! Because I said they are outnumbered by a million to one! And ever since I said that they won’t argue with me! In the book “The art of war” it says the supreme art of war is to defeat your enemy without fighting!
Anonymouse1 on Fri, 2nd Feb 2018 9:03 pm
Added: He also answers to the name of, dumbass.
fmr-paultard on Fri, 2nd Feb 2018 10:10 pm
MUSLIMIND please tell us moar about your breeding plan bro.
https://imgur.com/a/rVnCv