Page added on September 13, 2010
There’s a reason Deutsche Asset Management cares about climate change. It’s going to drive huge investments.
Well, I guess you can add Deutsche Asset Management – which handles very large sums of money for corporations, high net-worth individuals and other denizens of the most rarefied heights of market capitalism – to the stable of card-carrying socialists who buy into that hoaxy-fakey climate change thing, as Sarah Palin might phrase it.
Deutsche Asset Management, part of the German Deutsche Bank Group, sees climate change as a potent money-spinner – all that low-carbon energy plant and equipment that the world will need in the 21st century will require large gobs of capital investment, an opportunity for smart investors who want to get in on the ground floor.
The company’s managers, analysts, and researchers have plenty on their plates, so surely they had better things to do with their time than researching and publishing a 51-page report knocking down climate change skeptics’ bogus arguments, which continue wandering the media and political landscapes like B movie zombies.
Manufactured controversies can still create doubt among lay people who don’t live and breathe climate science, however. In order to help investors sort fact from fiction, the report head-butts three categories of skeptics’ arguments – that the Earth is not warming, that if it’s warming, CO2 is not the cause, and that if the Earth is warming and CO2 is a factor, nothing should be done about it.
You’ve heard it before from many sources in many contexts, but Deutsche’s report concluded what many other reputable reports have concluded: that evidence shows that the climate responds to forcing mechanisms, adding a heat-trapping gas to the atmosphere is one such forcing mechanism, short-term weather events neither prove nor disprove long-term climate trends, you can’t blame the sun for the observed increase in global temperatures, and there is nothing to the loud assertions that an evil cabal of mad scientists cooked up the climate change story. Et cetera. Et cetera.
More news for high-flying clean energy investors: Ernst & Young’s latest index rating of countries for their attractiveness to renewable energy investors places China in the top spot, pushing the U.S. to number 2. Woo-hoo, we’re number 2. Ernst & Young fingered Congress’ failure to adopt a national renewable energy standard, combined with the pending expiration of Treasury grant incentives, low natural gas prices and declining electricity demand as causes of the slip.
The index includes an overall rating and ratings for how attractive a country is for investing in individual renewables. China bests the U.S. in onshore and offshore wind. Still, there is hope that the U.S. has not yet given away the technology store to China completely, as the index rates the U.S. higher than China in solar photovoltaics, concentrating solar power, biomass, and geothermal.
Despite the best efforts of feckless Democrats and clueless Republicans to play small and stupid on energy, there is still a window for the U.S. to grab the pole position on pushing energy technologies that will build industries, cut pollution, and tamp down dangerous petro-geopolitics. It won’t be open much longer.
3 Comments on "Why a Bank Is Working to Debunk Climate Skeptics’ Arguments"
KenZ300 on Mon, 13th Sep 2010 8:32 am
When the Republican right realizes that there is money to be made in alternative energy suddenly they will drop their love of fossil fuels and jump on the alternative energy bandwagon. The oil and gas lobby will be disappointed to see their “friends” jump ship and run for the money.
Ah — friends that money can buy….
Selfish, self centered, greedy ….
Will we transition to alternative fuels soon enough to slow the damage to the economy from high oil prices and energy shortages?
Will national security be at risk from high energy prices and lack of supply?
klem on Tue, 14th Sep 2010 1:02 am
It comes down to this; transitioning to renewables will require a better sales pitch. The brutal ‘save the planet’ fraud has run it’s course, it’s dead. And the sooner you greens realize this the better. Deutche Bank’s attempt at refuting the skeptics claim is 2 years too late and has received no traction. Their $7 billion Green fund is falling to $6 B and soon will be $1 Billion (lol!). And also this lame ‘China will beat us’ fear mongering strategy is not relevant to anyone, no one gives a rats-ass about china; the USA is still technological king and everyone knows it.
The public will buy into renewables big time for the right reasons; but the reasons simply have not been sold to them yet. Trying to jam renewables down the public’s throat against their will is a recipe for disaster, as we will witness this November.
Just get a better sales pitch for renewables.
Edpeak on Wed, 15th Sep 2010 7:59 am
“The brutal ’save the planet’ fraud has run it’s course, it’s dead. And the sooner you greens realize this the better”
Yeah, and the sooner the laws of physics realize that black is white, night is day and 1+1=3, the better, right? Never mind that you most likely can’t tell us what the current ppm is for CO2 if your live depended on it, or if you do, have never seen or bothered to look at a graph of CO2 over the last 400,000 years…tell the number that it’s “Fraud” they they have a massive, huge, leap upwards in the last 200 year, so massive a leap in CO2 that it makes the previous 400,000 years seem like slow changes everywhere (except when extinction events)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1c/Carbon_Dioxide_400kyr.png
Tell your “fraud” line to the laws of physics in the ocean, tell your line of “fraud” to the 30% higher acidity concentration in the oceans, which you either never knew about (which might be foregiveable) or much worse, you don’t care what the damn facts are, you don’t care that these and 10 other things could be mentioned which are not “theory” or “predictions” but which have already happened, to our planet. Play Russian Roullette with the entire bottom of the food chain in the ocean by changing ocean pH faster than at any time in hundreds of thousands to millions of years? why not, and for extra chutzpah and bravado, let’s call it all a “fraud”, all those facts about what’s ALREADY happened..
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1c/Carbon_Dioxide_400kyr.png