Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on January 23, 2015

Bookmark and Share

The shale oil fields most at risk

With crude prices down nearly 60 percent from their highs, investors are learning that not all oilfields are created equal.

U.S. oil production grew 49 percent between 2008 and 2013, as drillers improved productivity and tapped high-yield debt markets. But with their product fetching far less these days, exploration and production companies have slashed capital expenditure budgets and are being pickier about where they plumb for oil.

At current price levels, firms could take as many as 650 onshore rigs offline—or about one-third of the nearly 1,900 that were drilling at last year’s peak in November, Wells Fargo analyst David Tameron told CNBC’s “Power Lunch” recently. Last week, the U.S. rig count stood at 1,676, according to Baker Hughes.

Drillers have begun reducing rigs in big shale regions, including the Permian Basin in Texas and New Mexico, the country’s highest-producing region, as well as North Dakota’s Bakken Shale and the Eagle Ford in south and east Texas. But shutdowns in other, less productive and emerging areas will likely be more widespread.

The Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (TMS) has some of the nation’s highest breakeven costs—about $70 to $90 a barrel for benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude—according to energy investment banking firm Tudor Pickering Holt.

The TMS lies under a swath of the Deep South that runs along the border of Louisiana and Mississippi. While it is believed to hold 7 billion barrels of oil, that black gold is buried between 11,000 feet and more than 15,000 feet below the surface. That compares with depths as shallow as 5,500 feet in some parts of the Permian Basin.

Already, exploration and production companies are pulling out. Last month, Comstock Resources suspended drilling in the TMS, and Halcon Resources said in November it would wind down operations there.

Halcon recently slashed its drilling and completion budget roughly by half. The company has about 315,000 acres in the play and attracted $400 million in investment to drill there, according to its website.

“I’m going to do my darndest to make sure that people understand that we’re highly confident and we like the play,” Halcon CEO Floyd Wilson told investors on a conference call in November. “However, it is currently a relatively high-cost play, and with currently low crude prices we will not be devoting a significant portion of our resources to TMS in the near term.”

Another area that will definitely see cuts is the Mississippian Lime, said Michael Rowe, an analyst at Tudor Pickering Holt. Located in Oklahoma and Kansas, the play is comprised of a basin roughly the size of West Virginia. Producers need oil at roughly $75 a barrel to break even there.

MS Lime wells produce a lot of water, and regulations connected to the water use create additional labor, transportation and power costs, said Richard Tullis, energy equity analyst at Capital One Securities.

Oklahoma City-based SandRidge Energy, the largest player in the MS Lime, said this month it was reducing its rig count and capital expenditure levels. The company’s shares are down nearly 80 percent over the last six months, from just under $7 to little more than $1.

The upside is that SandRidge was able to buy property in the area on the cheap, perhaps for as little as a few hundred dollars an acre, Tullis said. That compares with tens of thousands of dollars per acre in parts of the Permian when oil prices were at highs.

Low land prices make it less painful for exploration and production companies to put the brakes on projects. “I suspect you can let leases expire in the MS Lime and then come back and re-lease them for the same or better terms,” Tullis said.

Producers can continue drilling in plays with break-even levels at the midrange, provided they have a top-tier capital structure, Rowe said. And they can reduce well costs not only by renegotiating prices with oilfield supply companies, but by drilling more efficiently.

Jones Energy is doing that in the Anadarko Basin, located in western Kansas and the Texas panhandle, analysts said. It produces more than 18,000 barrels of oil a day from 1,284 drilling locations across 152,000 acres in the Cleveland, Tonkawa and Marmaton areas, according to its website.

Those are “tight sands” plays—meaning the ground has low permeability and must be drilled using more advanced methods. They can be unpredictable from a drilling standpoint, Rowe said. Their break-even prices range from the high $50s to high $70s per barrel, but Jones thrives in the area because its focus is narrow.

“This is all they do. They know it extremely well. They build relationships with service operators in the basin and tailor well completion design depending on which zone they’re trying to target,” he said.

Producers who are not on the same page—on the cutting edge in terms of drilling technology and capital costs—will have to pull rigs out of pricey shale plays, Rowe said.

CNBC



9 Comments on "The shale oil fields most at risk"

  1. rockman on Fri, 23rd Jan 2015 6:37 am 

    “I’m going to do my darndest to make sure that people understand that we’re highly confident and we like the play,” Halcon CEO Floyd Wilson told investors on a conference call in November.”

    And ole Floyd was ”highly confident” in the Eagle Ford Shale trend. At least that’s what he told the folks who paid him $15 billion for his EFS acreage a while back when he completely abandoned the hot south Texas trend. I wonder how confident those folks who bought out his position are today as they are cancelling rig contracts? I wonder how much confidence he’ll be able to inject into the potential investors in his TMS acreage? And 315,000 acres he holds in the trend? The clock is ticking: every lease will automatically expire if it isn’t drilled in the forthcoming years.

  2. forbin on Fri, 23rd Jan 2015 8:48 am 

    Rock , obviously he’s a dammed good salesman….

    I’ve got some sand he can peddle to the Arabs as well….;-)

    Forbin

  3. Tom on Fri, 23rd Jan 2015 9:18 am 

    Thank God for Rockman who sheds oil field insider wisdom and sunshine onto otherwise full-of-BS hype from Ponzi scheme shysters.

  4. Plantagenet on Fri, 23rd Jan 2015 10:50 am 

    I second that, Tom. Rockman provides rock solid info again and again.

    Thanks, Rockman.

  5. rockman on Fri, 23rd Jan 2015 11:15 am 

    You’re welcome guys. Actually most in the oil patch would call these guys for what they are as well as laying out the situation just as it is. Unfortunately what most of the world gets to hear is the PR dept spin from the public oils. Equally unfortunate is that most of the oil patch boots on the ground don’t give a crap if the public gets the truth. Basically it doesn’t impact their world very much one way or the other.

    I do it for a number of reasons. One, I spend a lot of time in front of a computer monitor…probably 12+ hrs/day thanks to my MS. Second, being a geologist, I’m a natural attention whore. Third, I just like to think that at least some very small insignificant minority has some idea of what the situation really is.

    So again you’re very welcome, my band of very small insignificant minority brothers. LOL.

  6. sunweb on Fri, 23rd Jan 2015 12:55 pm 

    Please include me in the appreciative band.

  7. rockman on Fri, 23rd Jan 2015 5:02 pm 

    sun – Always good to hear from another insignificant minority.

  8. Northwest Resident on Fri, 23rd Jan 2015 5:11 pm 

    rockman — You know I’m in the insignificant minority club. No need to even mention that fact, it’s a given. Only reason I’m bothering to post this is, I have a question. You wouldn’t happen to have bumper stickers that you can give out, do you? You know, something like “I’m a proud member of the Rockman Insignificant Minority Club”. If not, you should make some up — I’ll take a dozen!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *