Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on September 3, 2018

Bookmark and Share

The Biggest Threat To The Oil And Gas Industry

Business

Trump’s trade war is taking a toll on the oil and gas industry.

There has been some eleventh-hour drama over the renegotiation of NAFTA, but the energy industry is likely going to dodge a bullet on that front, with the most contentious issues revolving around agriculture and automobiles.

But even if the NAFTA renegotiation succeeds, the oil and gas industry has already taken a hit from Trump’s broader trade war.

The most obvious impact comes from the 25 percent steel and 10 percent aluminum tariffs that the Trump administration has placed on a variety of countries, which have pushed up the cost of steel in the U.S., leading to cost inflation for oil and gas projects. Worse, the application system for waivers is cumbersome and time-consuming, and some companies are angry because precisely who obtains an exemption from the federal government seems to be arbitrary.

For instance, as Reuters reported, Chevron received a waiver for importing a 4.5-inch steel pipe used for oil exploration while a small company called Borusan Mannesmann Pipe saw its application rejected by the U.S. Commerce Department for a similar steel pipe used in well casing. The Commerce Department has been accused of not providing adequate information on why it rejects certain cases, offering only vague language such as the availability of domestic steel. A common thread in the rejections seems to be opposition submitted from steel producers.

Reuters says that Commerce has received over 37,000 applications for waivers from U.S. companies, but the agency has only issued decisions on 2,871 of those requests as of August 20. Roughly two-thirds of the applications were approved, but nearly 1,100 were rejected. “The Commerce Department is now hard-pressed to spend more than a few minutes reviewing each application,” said Bernd Janzen, a partner in Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, told Reuters. In the case of Borusan, which saw its application rejected, the company expects its operating costs to rise from $25 to $35 million because of the tariffs.

A few weeks ago, Plains All American also was rebuffed by Commerce for imported steel for its Cactus oil pipeline in Texas. The CEO of Plains called the tariffs a “$40 million tax.” The Cactus pipeline is seen as particularly important because it will help relieve the midstream bottleneck in the Permian when it comes online.

Needless to say, steel and aluminum are crucial materials to oil and gas projects, and while the Trump administration is aiming to revive domestic manufacturing, users of those components will pay the price. The costs will reverberate throughout the energy industry, from upstream producers, to oilfield services, refiners, LNG exporters and the endless array of related suppliers and servicers.

Still, things could soon get much worse. The Trump administration is reportedly on the verge of moving ahead with the proposed $200 billion in tariffs on Chinese goods, according to Bloomberg. The proposed duties have to go through a public comment period, but that period ends on September 6, clearing the way for Trump to proceed.

Some even view the progress on NAFTA as a worrying sign for the U.S.-China dispute. “So as far as China and Asia are concerned, this new Mexico deal solves nothing,” ING Bank NV in Singapore wrote in a note after the U.S.-Mexico bilateral deal was announced. “It strengthens the U.S. position to play hard-ball with China. This doesn’t look good for the region.”

The personnel making up the Trump administration are often described as being divided into two camps, those in favor of free trade and those that are more nationalistic, spoiling for a trade fight with China. The latter group, seems to have had the upper hand as of late. “The hawks are certainly in the ascendancy on China trade policy,” Amy Celico, Principal of Albright Stonebridge Group said on Bloomberg TV.

That does not bode well for a resolution to the trade fight. China has signaled that it won’t back down and will try to match U.S. tariffs with levies of their own. Up until now, China has refrained from slapping tariffs on U.S. crude oil and LNG exports, but there is a good chance that the next phase will ensnare oil and gas.

At that point, the trade war could start to affect global growth. “The scale is enormous and once the tariffs materialize, they will definitely send jitters through financial markets,” Gai Xinzhe, an analyst at the Bank of China’s Institute of International Finance in Beijing, told Bloomberg.

Implementation of the $200 billion in tariffs is not a foregone conclusion. The Trump administration could impose tariffs in increments, delay them or hold off altogether. But should Trump choose to take the trade fight to the next level, he will be doing so at a time when emerging markets are rattled by currency turmoil, global growth looks shaky, and a growing number of economists see rising potential for a recession in the U.S. over the next two years.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

 



7 Comments on "The Biggest Threat To The Oil And Gas Industry"

  1. print baby print on Mon, 3rd Sep 2018 8:07 am 

    Because the global growth is not sustainable any more because of the supply constraints . The fallacy starts , peak demand. tariffs . trade war. Why we always have to lie.

  2. print baby print on Mon, 3rd Sep 2018 8:09 am 

    I apologise to Mr Nicolas
    What we need is less pressure on vital ecological systems and precious remaining resources. But good luck finding a politician willing to admit that.

    Though a refreshing exception is French environmental minister Nicolas Hulot who dramatically resigned his position last week, on live television, declaring “I don’t want to lie to myself anymore.

  3. twocats on Mon, 3rd Sep 2018 8:46 am 

    trump has failed on almost every single one of his populist promises even though they are a large part of why he won.

    if he doesn’t continue with the trade tariffs, then the repugs are going to be left running MS13 and Mollie Tibbets spots for the midterms.

  4. joe on Mon, 3rd Sep 2018 10:05 am 

    Trump was a marshmallow from day one. He talked the talk but I knew he couldn’t walk the walk with the muslim ban thing. See any fool who read the 28 pages of the 911 whitewash report knows at least two of the hijackers was funded by Saudi Arabia. Yet
    Trump did t ban any serious muslim countries, he could have just banned them in the full knowledge that the ban wouldn’t stick in court, but to make a point, but no, he went native, did the Saudi shuffle, prayed at the glowing orb and came home with a weapons deal to help fund the yemen genocide of shia minorities. Then McCain (another evil warmonger) shot down his health bill ambitions, so Trump passed a tax break for the rich (Dems made that an easy vote)…
    Yet somehow I still think that Trump is in his own way trying to mess things up for the establishment, the trade war itself flies in the face of globalists negotiating patterns, so watch this space, Trump is not what we thought he would be, so far he hasn’t toppled and regimes that never attacked America, thats somthing in my book….

  5. Bloomer on Mon, 3rd Sep 2018 6:10 pm 

    Canada like the US has seen its manufacturing industries hollowed out during the last 3 decades. Much of the manufacturing was shipped overseas or to Mexico where cheap labour gives them a competitive advantage.

    Technology can be the equalizer and modern manufacturing plants can compete against low wage low tech facilities. However, what we saw in Canada and now in the US is that corporate tax cuts do not translate into reinvestment. Instead it is used for stock buybacks, higher executive compensation and more generous dividends to shareholders. Thus,the ideal that tariffs will spark a revival of American manufacturing is simply wishful thinking.

  6. Davy on Mon, 3rd Sep 2018 6:31 pm 

    “Canada like the US has seen its manufacturing industries hollowed out during the last 3 decades.”

    Yea, but the US is still a dominant player:
    “REPORT Global manufacturing scorecard: How the US compares to 18 other nations”
    https://tinyurl.com/y8ubep9a
    Country Manufacturing Output (USD in billions)
    China $2,010
    United States $1,867
    Percent of National Output
    China 27%
    United States 12%
    Percent of Global Manufacturing
    China 20%
    United States 18%

  7. Bloomer on Mon, 3rd Sep 2018 7:08 pm 

    Good link Davy, you will noticed tax cuts that’s promote r&d and new equipment is recommended to give companies incentive to reinvest. This was not the case in the Harper nor the Trump corporate tax cuts. Global manufacturing market share has diminished in both countries since 1970. Although Canada has faired worst then the US. So much for the assertion that Canada has treated the US unfairly under NAFTA and stolen American jobs.

    Quite frankly as a Canadian forestry worker who has seen the industry decimated, I sooner see NAFTA ripped up then renegotiate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *