Page added on July 11, 2010
The Lloyd’s insurance market and the highly regarded Institute of Strategic Studies (ISS, known as Chatham House) says Britain needs to be ready for “peak oil” and disrupted energy supplies at a time of soaring fuel demand in China and India, constraints on production caused by the BP oil spill and political moves to cut CO2 to halt global warming.
“Companies which are able to take advantage of this new energy reality will increase both their resilience and competitiveness. Failure to do so could lead to expensive and potentially catastrophic consequences,” says the Lloyd’s and ISS report “Sustainable energy security: strategic risks and opportunities for business”.
The insurance market has a major interest in preparedness to counter climate change because of the fear of rising insurance claims related to property damage and business disruption. The review is groundbreaking because it comes from the heart of the City and contains the kind of dire warnings that are more associated with environmental groups or others accused by critics of resorting to hype. It takes a pot shot at the International Energy Agency which has been under fire for apparently under-estimating the threats, noting: “IEA expectations [on crude output] over the last decade have generally gone unmet.”
The report the world is heading for a global oil supply crunch and high prices owing to insufficient investment in oil production plus a rebound in global demand following recession. It repeats warning from Professor Paul Stevens, a former economist from Dundee University, at an earlier Chatham House conference that lack of oil by 2013 could force the price of crude above $200 (£130) a barrel.
It also quotes from a US department of energy report highlighting the economic chaos that would result from declining oil production as global demand continued to rise, recommending a crash programme to overhaul the transport system. “Even before we reach peak oil,” says the Lloyd’s report, “we could witness an oil supply crunch because of increased Asian demand. Major new investment in energy takes 10-15 years from the initial investment to first production, and to date we have not seen the amount of new projects that would supply the projected increase in demand.”
And while the world is gradually moving to new kinds of clean energy technologies the insurance market warns that there could be shortages of earth metals and other raw materials needed to help them thrive.
Lloyd’s also calls on manufacturers, retailers and the wider business community to reassess global supply chains and their just-in time models because the “current system is increasingly vulnerable to disruption.”
The report says government needs to do much more to bring additional price stability and transparency if the global carbon market is to become a reality.
Richard Ward, chief executive of Lloyd’s, said the failure of the Copenhagen climate change talks last December has helped lull many business leaders into a false sense of security about the challenges ahead. “We are in a period akin to a phony war. We keep hearing of difficulties to come, but with oil, gas and coal still broadly accessible – and largely capable of being distributed where they are needed – the bad times have not yet hit … all businesses … will be affected by energy supplies which are less reliable and more expensive.”
7 Comments on "Lloyd’s adds its voice to dire ‘peak oil’ warnings"
KenZ300 on Mon, 12th Jul 2010 12:08 am
We need to diversify our energy sources and bring on more and more alternative energy. Wind, solar, geothermal and biofuels all need public support and political support. If every garbage dump in the country could produce cellulose ethanol from the trash then we could go a long way to reducing oil needed for transportation fuels. It would also reduce the need for ever expanding land fill sites. The raw material input is there and already being collected.
Energy security and national security require that countries move to develop safe reliable energy for the future.
KenZ300 on Mon, 12th Jul 2010 2:26 am
Ethanol is suppling 10% of the mix in motor fuels in the US. The world is using more and more ethanol each day. Will the transition to biofuels be fast enough to avert a spike in oil prices?
indigoboy on Mon, 12th Jul 2010 3:50 am
The increase in the ethanol mix in fuels, is used to mask the fact that conventional fuel is declining.
Unfortunately, we’re close to the limit of how much corn can be used (abused?) to alleviate the transport industry.
Roderick Beck on Mon, 12th Jul 2010 3:59 am
Ken,
You are living in dream land. The only way forward will be nuclear power, massive improvements in energy efficiency, and natural gas.
KenZ300 on Mon, 12th Jul 2010 11:37 am
Nuclear power is a Gulf oil disaster waiting to happen. When we figure how to get rid of the nuclear waste safely and for a reasonable price we can talk about nuclear.
Does anyone remember Chernobyl? One accident will change lives forever.
i on Mon, 12th Jul 2010 11:48 pm
The pathetic energy return on corn-ethanol will forever make it no more than a political stopgap. Had we the political guts, we’d cut a deal with Cuba to have them grow sugar cane ethanol (much better EROEI) or start growing it here in a big way. I don’t see either happening. I don’t think it’s even on the White House radar, since it’s just a practical matter that would solve a problem. The government, apparently, doesn’t do that sort of thing anymore.
madness on Sat, 17th Jul 2010 6:52 pm
We are all to blame for the disaster which will unfold as soon as oil is not available to everyone. The only reason there is such a large population in the world today is because there is oil. There will be mass murder