Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on January 7, 2011

Bookmark and Share

Is there enough oil to repay debt?

Business

The year 2010 left us all with a mountain of debt. Whether you’re a taxpayer in Britain, Ireland or the U.S., it must already be pretty clear that you’re on the hook for a lot of IOUs borrowed from your future. You may not have borrowed the money yourself, but your government has already done it on your behalf, running up massive, record-setting deficits. What’s not clear is exactly how your government is going to pay that debt back.

With students already rioting in London over huge tuition increases, and general strikes the order of the day in places like Athens and Madrid, chances are slim that incumbent governments will survive long enough to cut their way to fiscal solvency. That’s not to say the fiscal brakes aren’t on (they are—at least everywhere but in the U.S.). But the deficits are so gargantuan (Ireland’s is equal to one-third of the country’s GDP) that the twin tasks of slashing spending and hiking taxes could last decades, provoking all kinds of social and political push-back during that time.

Given austerity’s slim chance at success, you might ask why government borrowing rates in the bond market, though rising, aren’t much higher. History would suggest that the yield on a 10-year U.S. Treasury bond should be close to double what it is, given the size of Washington’s borrowing program.

The reason it’s not is that creditors and debtors both share a common belief that a powerful economic recovery lies just around the corner—one so powerful, in fact, that tax revenues will suddenly fill government coffers and let bondholders be paid the huge sums they are owed while sparing taxpayers an otherwise draconian fate.

The only problem is that the economic growth everyone is counting on is powered by oil. And as you’ve probably noticed, that’s getting more and more expensive to burn.

The minute global industrial production recovered from the recession, oil prices were suddenly on the verge of triple digits. That’s not an accident, since the two go hand in hand. Global oil demand is up 2.5 million barrels per day from last year. Any further increases in oil demand and oil prices will be trading comfortably in triple-digit range.

That suddenly makes all that government debt very energy-intensive. It will take huge amounts of energy, particularly oil, to achieve the growth rates that all the near-bankrupt governments around the world need to even service their debt, let alone repay it.

So consider just how sustainable economic growth would be in a world of oil prices of $100 to $225 per barrel. Because those are the price parameters we’d be facing in the unlikely event that we actually see the kind of economic growth that bond markets and public treasuries around the world are so desperately depending on.

The Globe and Mail



3 Comments on "Is there enough oil to repay debt?"

  1. Kenz300 on Fri, 7th Jan 2011 7:00 am 

    The last time oil went to $147 / barrel was in 2008. When families started spending more money on their monthly transportation costs they cut other places in their budget. (food, mortgage, rent, clothing).

    We all be be using energy more wisely as the price increases.

    Can we transition to a more sustainable economy fast enough to reduce the impact of high energy prices?

    Dust off that bicycle — the obesity problem may be solved with high energy prices.

  2. Trent Appleman on Fri, 7th Jan 2011 3:13 pm 

    If a jubilee (a kind of succession of sovereign debt defaults) should erase exotic debts, then with what are we left? We are left with the same factory and the same workers capable of operating that factory; we are left with an intact infrastructure as clean, as capable of operating — pending resource constraints — as before. The supply of oil may well order us around in the coming decades; but debt, unlike the supply of oil, is a chimera powered by human belief. The erasure of debt not being the same as the erasure of intact infrastructure, it would appear that sovereign debt default is not only inevitable but desirable! You see, when push comes to shove the actuality of infrastructure beats the ghost of debt. The actuality of infrastructure may have to reckon with resource constraints — that appearing more of a genuine menace than paying off these silly debts — but that is another story entirely.

  3. Edpeak on Sun, 9th Jan 2011 11:57 am 

    “The erasure of debt not being the same as the erasure of intact infrastructure, it would appear that sovereign debt default is not only inevitable but desirable!”

    but not desirable to the top 0.5% richest, and the politicians who are either in their pockets or at least, afraid to challenge them. People power in all its forms of grassroots organizing is the only counter force to money power. Otherwise, expect more cuts until we are third-world in quality of life. Time to fight back!

    WARREN BUFFETT: If anything, taxes for the lower and middle class and
    maybe even the upper middle class should even probably be cut further,
    but I think that people at the high end, people like myself, should be
    paying a lot more in taxes. We have it better than we’ve ever had

    CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR: They say you have to keep those tax cuts, even on
    the very wealthy, because that is what energizes business and
    capitalism.

    WARREN BUFFETT: The rich are always going to say that, you know, just
    give us more money, and we’ll go out and spend more, and then it will
    all trickle down to the rest of you. But that has not worked the last
    10 years. And I hope the American public is catching on.

    http://www.democracynow.org/2010/12/2/jacob_hacker_on_the_debate_over

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *