Page added on July 17, 2018
Houston is set to get its own oil futures, a sign of the city’s growing importance as the U.S. sends more crude abroad.
Intercontinental Exchange Inc. ICE 0.66% is planning a new crude futures contract with physical delivery in Houston, the company said Tuesday. The contract will provide traders with direct access to Houston prices. The exchange is aiming to launch this quarter, subject to regulatory review.
For decades, the benchmark for U.S. oil prices has been in Cushing, Okla., because of its accessibility through major pipelines and extensive storage space. However, with the U.S. on track to become a major energy exporter, some analysts say that pricing power is shifting to the Gulf Coast, where oil gets loaded onto tankers and shipped overseas.
“Houston’s become the main trading hub,” said Jeff Barbuto, vice president of oil markets at ICE. “It’s a better representation of the economics of where U.S. crude production meets the water to be exported.”
U.S. exports of crude oil have surged since a 40-year-old ban was lifted in 2015. In June, crude exports reached a record high of 3 million barrels a day, and have since stayed at about 2 million barrels a day. Meanwhile, U.S. shale companies are producing at record levels of 10.9 million barrels a day.
Right now, those who want to trade Houston prices use futures that track Cushing prices and contracts that track the difference between the two locations. An outright Houston contract could help streamline the process for traders and companies looking to lock in prices for their crude.
“This will help our customers through the process of hedging their risk around those differentials,“ said Mark Roles, vice president of commercial crude oil at Magellan Midstream Partners LP, whose East Houston terminal will act as the settlement and delivery point for the new contract. “As more volumes hit the international market, we’re going to see a much stronger need for pricing and hedging,” he said.
Several times this year, Cushing prices were influenced by logistical issues, creating headaches for producers, said John Coleman, an analyst at energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie.
“There’s a lot of guesswork that goes into factors impacting Cushing,“ Mr. Coleman said. “A coastal-based contract is going to be much more relevant in selling crude into the global market.”
Houston may also start competing with other major export locations such as Corpus Christi, analysts said, as more infrastructure is built out to ship crude overseas.
The plans for a Houston futures contract come at a time when regional prices are splintering. A lack of pipelines and workers have depressed prices in Midland, Texas, as crude supply is unable to get out. As of Friday, Midland prices were $8.44 a barrel below where U.S. oil futures based on Cushing prices closed. Meanwhile, Houston prices are currently trading $4.77 above Cushing.
New futures contracts regularly face hurdles in garnering enough traction and liquidity to compete with other well-established products. Many doubt that trading off Houston prices will quickly overtake that of Cushing.
“The old guard may be slow to shift into a new pricing dynamic,” Mr. Coleman said.
In 2016, CME Group launched futures contracts that track the difference between Houston and Cushing prices—allowing market participants to hedge their exposure to gaps. Combined open interest on such products between ICE and CME has steadily risen to more than 180,000 contracts, more than double last year’s level. ICE and CME are the two dominant players in the oil futures market.
Escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and China could also derail the trend of growing exports, and undermine the emphasis on Houston pricing, said Philip Verleger, an energy economist.
“China is one natural market for U.S. crude,“ Mr. Verleger said. “The trade war that’s been started by Trump could cause some problems initially.”
70 Comments on "Houston Is a Big Energy Hub, So Why Not Price Oil Futures There?"
dave thompson on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 2:24 pm
This article is complete BS. The US is a net crude importer. The stuff that they want to export no one wants. Unless it is refined products.
Anonymouse1 on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 2:44 pm
Exactly dave, the uS is a NET IMPORTER of just about *everything* energy wise. It imports:
-Electricity
-Natural Gas
-Oil (and lots of it).
-Uranium and other radioactives.
About the only thing the amerikan empire does not import (afaik), is raw coal.
Without energy imports from its colonies, the amerikan empires, War-Handgun-HFCS-Wall ST economy would shrink drastically, and likely collapse entirely. To mention nothing of its global empire of bases and puppet states.
So wtf is it with all the retards in the uS dis-information sphere going on about, that the uS is about to become some sort of energy-exporting juggernaut? Is it just wishful thinking? An in-ability to do things like basic math? Or is just the collective insanity of the amerikan empire, and their scribblers, as it crawls towards inevitable collapse?
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 2:50 pm
make sure to purchase a copy of the Wall Street Urinals lead energy writers book about fracking called “The Boom”..
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 4:15 pm
In the next crash the US dollar will be crushed..
https://twitter.com/LukeGromen/status/1018920184437002241
twocats on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 4:33 pm
wow. this article is stupendously tone-deaf – houston already has a great history as an energy trading hub – it was called Enron.
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 4:54 pm
Lights go out at White House as Trump pledges loyalty to US intelligence
https://www.rt.com/usa/433539-lights-go-out-secret-services/
I knew this whole war against the deep state was fake..just red meat for his ignorant base..He does what he is told..He is the deep state/Israels bitch..
Duncan Idaho on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 9:32 pm
Houston Is a Big Energy Hub, So Why Not Price Oil Futures There?
It gets flooded and polluted on a regular basis, and is populated by clueless greed heads?
Makati1 on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 10:04 pm
“How is the U.S. is becoming “Energy Independent,” if we are still importing almost 8 million barrels per day of oil?? …
Well, it’s quite simple. The U.S. Shale Oil Industry is producing way too much light tight oil, with a high API Gravity, for our refineries that are designed for a lower grade. So, as U.S. shale oil production exploded, the industry was forced to export a great deal more of this light oil overseas….
The United States will never become energy independent even if domestic shale oil production continues to surge higher. However, I believe shale oil production in the states will likely start to decline within the next 1-3 years. When the OVER-BLOATED and HIGHLY LEVERAGED stock markets begin to collapse, they will also take down the oil price. A falling oil price will destroy the already weakened shale oil industry…
https://srsroccoreport.com/u-s-energy-independence-still-importing-nearly-8-million-barrels-of-oil-per-day/
Energy independent? LMAO
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 10:21 pm
Madkat
We don’t use all of that 8 million we import..Only around 2.5 million barrels currently, the rest we just refine and ship back out to export..The US is only 15 percent left to go to be energy independent..
GregT on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 10:26 pm
“We don’t use all of that 8 million we import..Only around 2.5 million barrels currently, the rest we just refine and ship back out to export..”
‘We’?
I wasn’t aware that you worked for the big multinational oil companies MM.
I thought you said you were an unemployed chemist?
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 10:49 pm
Dems say Russia election hacking was an act of war..Urge cyber attack on Russian banks!
https://twitter.com/LibertyBlitz/status/1019251284514201601
Hit em hard!
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 10:59 pm
There has been an explosion in economic inequality. A few dozen individuals control the same amount of wealth as the poorest half of humanity. That’s not an exaggeration, that’s a statistic. Think about that..
-Barack Obama, 7/17/18
Makati1 on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:08 pm
Greg, obviously MM did not read the article or he would have understood that the Us DOES need those 8M/bbl/day. Maybe Boat could explain it to him? LOL
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:08 pm
Chevron’s new chief vows to keep lid on spending
The slump in oil investment since prices collapsed in 2014 has prompted a swelling chorus of warnings from analysts and executives that world crude production growth could fail to keep pace with demand, leading to shortages and soaring prices in the next decade..
https://www.ft.com/content/e4e2f5ba-89aa-11e8-bf9e-8771d5404543
Makati1 on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:14 pm
Greg, The author replied to MM’s stupidity…
“SRSrocco | July 13, 2018 at 9:26 pm | Reply
MASTERMIND,
I am surprised by your comment. I gather you don’t understand that we need that oil because our refineries are designed for more heavier crude. Do you actually believe we should be important 8 mbd if we only need 2.6 mbd?? If we are exporting nearly 2 mbd of oil, why don’t we just keep what we are producing and not export that oil?
Furthermore, a larger percentage of liquid oils production is Very Light Tight Oil and Condensate.”
https://srsroccoreport.com/u-s-energy-independence-still-importing-nearly-8-million-barrels-of-oil-per-day/
LMAO!
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:15 pm
Madkat
And our net oil imports are only around 2.6 million barrels in April..Which means we are around 85% of the way to oil independence.End of story..
Source: EIA
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mttntus2&f=m
Makati1 on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:16 pm
bTW: Go to the author’s site and read how he educated our arrogant MM. It is educational. LOL
Makati1 on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:21 pm
“So it is not the END OF STORY. While we agree on many things, your insistence to only look at the Net Import figure has blinded you to the complicated technical issues of producing a great deal of Light Tight Oil.”
So much for MM’s chemistry degree! Now we shall see what the couch potato ‘chemist’ replies.
Even I understand distillation and types of oil required by different refineries. Mm’s comment is like asking a winery to make Jack Daniels from grapes. lol
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:24 pm
Madkat
We are keeping what we produce..And we are importing the rest, plus extra, to refine and export to resale..this isn’t a hard concept to grasp..That is why you have to look at the “net imports” from the EIA link I cited above..
Makati1 on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:24 pm
BTW: The above quote (“so it is not..”) is also from the author at SRSrocco, not me.
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:26 pm
Madkat
I know much about shale oil chemistry…
Ultra-light oil makes poor-quality gasoline that has to be put through an additional process (and cost) called catalytic reforming that boosts octane to sales specifications. And most crucial is that this light oil lacks the middle distillates needed to produce diesel and jet fuel. Those are the three biggest refined product markets so ultra-light oil has a lot going against it.
Right now, the main approach is to blend the ultra-light with heavier grades of oil to create a mixture that can be put into refineries. This has created high demand for heavier oil (20-30 API gravity). The main sources for the U.S. are deep-water Gulf of Mexico, Mexico, Venezuela and Canada. Much of this heavy oil has problems of its own for refiners especially the syn-crude from Canada and Venezuela that contains large volumes of bitumen that requires a special kind of refinery (“cokers”) that can deal with the carbon and sell it as petroleum coke. Most of these refineries are in the Midwest (Chicago area mostly). The deep water GOM crude contains considerable sulphur that must be removed before refining further. As you can see, it is a complex problem. It reflects the fundamental premise of Peak Oil—namely, that we have run out of cheap oil.
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:28 pm
Madkat you and srrocco didn’t refute my evidence..You just babbled a bunch of jargon without any evidence..If you can show me where US “net oil imports” are 8 million barrels a day..I am all ears..
And our net oil imports are only around 2.6 million barrels in April..Which means we are around 85% of the way to oil independence.End of story..
Source: EIA
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mttntus2&f=m
GregT on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:49 pm
“Which means we are around 85% of the way to oil independence.End of story..”
So much for collapse then MM. False alarm.
GregT on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:54 pm
And MM,
I’m waiting with baited breath for you response to Steve R’s last post.
MASTERMIND on Tue, 17th Jul 2018 11:56 pm
Greg
If Europe and Asia and others can’t get enough oil the price will still spike and the global economy will collapse..Everything is interconnected..And I think we have reached our shale limit due to refining capacety..That is why the US lifted the export ban..and there are bottlenecks now..Also just a 4 percent shortage back in 1973 tripled the price of oil and caused all hell to break lose in the US..So even though we are only around 15 percent left to go..If we can’t bridge that gap the results would be catastrophic..
GregT on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:00 am
Why would the price spike in the U.S. MM, if the U.S. Is energy ‘independent’?
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:02 am
Greg
What is there to respond to? I made and argument and proved it with the EIA data..That’s case closed..
If he wants to refute it he needs to show some evidence that our “net imports” are the amount he is claiming..
GregT on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:05 am
“That is why the US lifted the export ban..”
The export ban was lifted because the big multinational oil company lobbyists put pressure on the government MM. They could care less about the U.S., or any other country for that matter. All that matters to them is the bottom line.
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:08 am
Greg
Because the US doesn’t have enough to produce to be the swing producer..We lost that role after the US peaked in 1970 to OPEC..Back when the US was the swing producer we could control the price of oil through the Texas railroad commission..To be the swing producer you need to have extra spare capacity..And Saudi Arabia is the only country with enough spare capacity.
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:11 am
Greg
The ban was initiated during the OPEC oil crisis in the 1970s. It was just to try to keep a handle on oil prices, but it didn’t work. Finally it was repealed at the end of 2015, but there were some allowances already happening. And Canada wasn’t subject to the ban at all, so there were always some exports to Canada (but we import far more from them)
Makati1 on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:14 am
MM is way out there in fantasy land Greg. He cannot understand simple reasoning. So much for his “genius” IQ. More like that of a mentally retarded child.
NET Us oil imports for 2017 was 3.73M bbls/day.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/191381/total-us-petroleum-net-imports-since-2000/
“This year the U.S. has averaged more than 900,000 barrels per day (BPD) of crude oil exports while continuing to import an average of 8.1 million BPD. In the previous article, I discussed the reasons the U.S. exports oil, despite the fact that we are still a significant net importer of crude oil.” (2017)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2017/10/05/where-the-u-s-exports-oil-and-petroleum-products/#53cd04e23f26
Energy independent? Not even close.
Makati1 on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:22 am
“In 2017, the United States consumed approximately 19.9 million barrels of oil daily.”
8,100,000 imported, minus 900,000 bbls exported = 7,200,000 bbls/day net imports, or ~36% of Us oil consumption in 2017. Hardly “independent”.
Makati1 on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:23 am
ref for previous:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/282716/oil-consumption-in-the-us-per-day/
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:28 am
Overshoot in the population is the root cause of all of the worlds problems.. If you think any party can fix this you are out of touch with reality..
We now traversed both sides of the political spectrum since the meat and potatoes of this downturn started in ’08, I think people should start accepting we’re fucked beyond ability to fix things via empty political promises..
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:32 am
Madkat
I gave you the link for what net oil imports were as of April 2018..And you are going back to 2017 to try and make them appear larger..And you stated they were 8 million barrels to start with, so even with your 3.7 number of 2017 you have already back tracked by half..
And our net oil imports are only around 2.6 million barrels in April 2018..Which means we are around 85% of the way to oil if we consume around 20 million barrels.
End of story..
Source: EIA
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mttntus2&f=m
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:35 am
Madkat
What you want to look at is Net Imports. That takes into consideration what we produce, use, import, and export..
And as of last update in April 2018 it was 2.6 million barrels a day..
Source: EIA
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mttntus2&f=m
GregT on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:40 am
“We lost that role after the US peaked in 1970 to OPEC.”
There’s that royal “we” again. Correct me if I’m wrong MM, but you weren’t even alive in 1970?
And Big Oil couldn’t care less about you, the US, or any other country. As a matter of fact, they don’t even care about the long term survivability of mankind, or any other life on this planet. All they care about is the bottom line. You could be living under a bridge eating worms for all they care. There is no ‘we’ about it.
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:48 am
Madkat
From your own source
But then the shale boom provided U.S. refiners with high quality, discounted crudes that they were then able to sell into the export market. As a result, finished product exports jumped from about a million barrels a day prior to the shale boom up to 4.7 million BPD in 2016.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2017/10/05/where-the-u-s-exports-oil-and-petroleum-products/#5f1614bf3f26
See we were exporting 4.7 million barrels back in 2016 and its increased further since..Not just 900k like you quoted above from pre shale oil boom.
GregT on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:50 am
“Overshoot in the population is the root cause of all of the worlds problems..”
And the root cause of overpopulation is human technologies and modern industrialism, both the direct result of a surplus in energy.
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 12:57 am
Greg
Then give up technology if you think its so bad..Its not like you add anything constructive to this forum anyways..No articles, no science studies, no memes, no quotes, nothing..Just insults and nit picking of others for no logical reason..
You are basically the “get off my lawn” old man of this board..
GregT on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 1:05 am
MM,
“And the root cause of overpopulation is human technologies and modern industrialism, both the direct result of a surplus in energy.”
What part of my above statement do you disagree with?
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 1:13 am
Hong Kong tightens screws on pro-independence party
The Hong Kong government is considering banning a pro-independence political party on unprecedented “national security” grounds, a move decried by activists as the latest violation of the city’s promised freedoms and rights.
https://www.ft.com/content/8740355e-8a3a-11e8-bf9e-8771d5404543
The people are rising! Just wait till their oil starts to run out! Goodbye China dictatorship!
Makati1 on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 1:22 am
MM has no real rebuttal, so the 9 year old emerges. Reminds me of someone else on this board, who lives with goats. And he still doesn’t understand plain English in my above comments. He refutes the authors on other reputable sites with no proof. He was put down on SRRocco by the author. Do the math, MM.
“8,100,000 imported, minus 900,000 bbls exported = 7,200,000 bbls/day net imports, or ~36% of Us oil consumption in 2017. Hardly “independent”.” Refs above.
Makati1 on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 1:24 am
MM changes the subject, just like the goat farmer, when he is cornered. lol
Davy on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 5:01 am
“8,100,000 imported, minus 900,000 bbls exported = 7,200,000 bbls/day net imports, or ~36% of Us oil consumption in 2017. Hardly “independent”.”
You forgot crude product exports, 3rd world. As usual you cherry pick and embellish for an extremist point. Add those numbers in to your export numbers and get back to me about hardly independent. I am not of the point this “nearly” independence will be long term but the fact are the facts now. You don’t deal with facts you deal with distortions for agenda purposes.
Davy on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 5:09 am
“There’s that royal “we” again.”
Greggger we don’t talk Canadian dialect. Stuff your royal “we” where the sun don’t shine. I get tired of your redundant “royal Canadian dumbass”
And Big Oil couldn’t care less about you, the US, or any other country.
They are not supposed to gregger so quit getting all bent out of shape about it. The have a mandate to their shareholders to turn a profit and pay debt, dividends, and grow share price. Bitch about market based capitalism which you have benefited handsomely from being the richest person on this board.
“As a matter of fact, they don’t even care about the long term survivability of mankind, or any other life on this planet.”
They are not supposed to gregger. You don’t either really because you talk one way but don’t walk the walk. Caring about the long term health of mankind is something governments and the people should care about. If they did care they would change behavior and change governance. Quit blaming big oil with the “royal “blame game”. If society really cared about what big oil is doing the industry would be nationalized.
Davy on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 5:11 am
“MM changes the subject, just like the goat farmer, when he is cornered. lol”
3rd world do you have the product export figures I asked for? Looks like I caught you in a senior moment of making a big ass error.
Davy on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 5:15 am
“And the root cause of overpopulation is human technologies and modern industrialism, both the direct result of a surplus in energy.”
You forgot human wisdom or the lack of which is the real root cause with your cause the result.
MASTERMIND on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 7:09 am
Madkat
I cited proof three times already from the EIA.. You and srroco are the ones not showing any proof to refute my evidence..
What you want to look at is Net Imports. That takes into consideration what we produce, use, import, and export..
And as of last update in April 2018 it was 2.6 million barrels a day..
Source: EIA
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mttntus2&f=m
GregT on Wed, 18th Jul 2018 8:30 am
” I get tired of your redundant “royal Canadian dumbass”
Aww, poor widdle Davy. Get used to it, because I’m not going anywhere.
“Bitch about market based capitalism which you have benefited handsomely from being the richest person on this board.”
More delusional BS from the spoiled little .0001%er kid, who had everything handed to him on a silver spoon.
And don’t try to feed everyone the story that you walked away from the .0001%er life of privilege, because if you did, you wouldn’t be living on Grandpa’s farm.