Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on August 2, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Big Oil struggles with costs as results fall flat

Business

Some of the western world’s top oil companies this week abandoned output targets, missed profit forecasts and promised a tight rein on spending after turning in disappointing quarterly results.

Thursday’s slew of industry results saw Royal Dutch Shell (RDSa.L) and Exxon Mobil (XOM.N) disappoint market analysts. The pair are two of the industry’s top three investor-controlled companies in the world. [ID:nL6N0G212A] [ID:nL1N0G20JK] The third, Chevron (CVX.N), is due to report on Friday.

Shell did what several of its peers did some time ago – abandon a promise to increase production growth so that it can meet its financial targets for cash flow growth and spending.

The earnings reports follow a profit miss from industry number four BP (BP.L) on Tuesday.

Only Total (TOTF.PA), Europe’s No. 3 behind Shell and BP, impressed investors with its first quarterly rise in production in three years.

“It’s a difficult time for the big integrateds. They are not seeing production growth, refining margins are deteriorating and costs are going up. That’s not a good combination,” said Brian Youngberg, oil analyst with Edward Jones in St Louis.

In contrast, smaller U.S. producers, which tend to have more of their operations in the United States and relatively more exposure to shale deposits, reported surging output. That is largely thanks to the drilling method known as hydraulic fracking that has unlocked oil and gas from shale deposits.

SHALE OUTPUT SURGES FOR SMALLER PRODUCERS

Among the smaller U.S. firms, ConocoPhillips (COP.N) reported a better-than-expected profit and raised its full-year production forecast.

It said its output from the Eagle Ford shale field in Texas almost doubled to 121,000 BOE per day. Conoco’s combined oil and gas production in the Eagle Ford shale field, the Bakken shale field in North Dakota, and Permian Basin in Texas rose 47 percent in the second quarter.

Apache Corp (APA.N), which reported a higher quarterly profit that matched Wall Street’s expectations, sold its Gulf of Mexico shelf assets last month to focus more on onshore production. It said its North American onshore liquids production rose 42 percent to 175,000 barrels per day in the quarter.

“We expect Apache to have an improved asset mix that will drive more predictable production growth and strong returns,” Chief Executive Steve Farris said in a statement.

Chesapeake Energy Corp’s (CHK.N) new Chief Executive Doug Lawler said the company was reviewing its partnerships and assets as the second largest U.S. natural gas provider tries to simplify its structure and improve financial discipline.

The company, which experienced a severe liquidity crunch in 2012 after spending heavily for years to acquire drilling acreage, reported a better-than-expected quarterly profit as it produced more crude oil than Wall Street targeted. Its shares rose 7 percent to the highest level in more than a year.

Reuters



5 Comments on "Big Oil struggles with costs as results fall flat"

  1. Luke on Fri, 2nd Aug 2013 10:11 am 

    Shell is paying the toll for corruption and polution in Nigeria. It has become a real “hell for Shell” over there. Lack of maintenance of their own old and rusty piping and several lawsuits with local people concerning poisoning the Niger Delta are kicking back on Shell. And the hypocrite reporting by Shell of so called stealing oil is worthless when at the same time Shell does support the Nigerian authorities to suppress any local protest against Big Oil’s spills.
    Cheap oil is in the main reason that Shell is still in this (corrupt) African nation. With no reasonable alternatives (neither shale or Artic deep sea will be)Anglo-Dutch Shell will slowly feel the pain of the nearing Peak Oil. And so its share holders.

  2. Arthur on Fri, 2nd Aug 2013 12:07 pm 

    From the wiki page for Shell:

    “Shell plc (LSE: RDSA, RDSB)… is the largest company in the world in terms of revenue and one of the six oil and gas “supermajors”. Shell is also one of the world’s most valuable companies.”

    The title of the article “struggles with cost” is misleading. Everybody would like to have the problems Shell has.

    Profit 2012: $27B.

  3. Mike999 on Fri, 2nd Aug 2013 12:38 pm 

    They should have started the transition to Solar 30 years ago.

  4. Arthur on Fri, 2nd Aug 2013 4:55 pm 

    Shell did invest in renewables for decades, but abandoned it a few years ago. But even Shell will admit that in a few decades solar will eclipse oil:

    http://business.financialpost.com/2013/02/28/solar-may-eclipse-oil-in-fifty-years-shell/?__lsa=4b86-7c21

  5. BillT on Sat, 3rd Aug 2013 1:43 am 

    Only because there will be no oil so anything over zero is an ‘eclipse’. But then, so is a candle.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *