Page added on February 12, 2014
U.S. scientists announced on Wednesday an important milestone in the costly, decades-old quest to develop fusion energy, which, if harnessed successfully, promises a nearly inexhaustible energy source for future generations.
For the first time, experiments have produced more energy from fusion reactions than the amount of energy put into the fusion fuel, scientists at the federally funded Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California said.
The researchers, led by physicist Omar Hurricane, described the achievement as important but said much more work is needed before fusion can become a viable energy source. They noted that did not produce self-heating nuclear fusion, known as ignition, that would be needed for any fusion power plant.
Researchers have faced daunting scientific and engineering challenges in trying to develop nuclear fusion – the process that powers stars including our sun – for use by humankind.
“Really for the first time anywhere, we’ve gotten more energy out of this fuel than was put into the fuel. And that’s quite unique. And that’s kind of a major turning point, in a lot of our minds,” Hurricane told reporters.
“I think a lot of people are jazzed.”
Unlike fossil fuels or the fission process in nuclear power plants, fusion offers the prospect of abundant energy without pollution, radioactive waste or greenhouse gases.
Unlike the current nuclear fission energy that is derived from splitting atoms, fusion energy is produced by fusing atoms together.
Experts believe it still will be many years or decades before fusion can become a practical energy source.
“I wish I could put a date on it,” said Hurricane. “But it really is (just) research. And, you know, although we’re doing pretty good, we’d be lying to you if we told you a date.”
Of the uncertain path ahead in fusion research, Hurricane compared it to “climbing half way up a mountain, but the top of the mountain is hidden in clouds. You can’t see it. You don’t have a map”.
The research was conducted at the laboratory’s National Ignition Facility (NIF), which was completed in 2009.
ZAP A TINY TARGET
The scientists used 192 laser beams to zap a tiny target containing a capsule less than a tenth of an inch (about 2 mm) in diameter filled with fusion fuel, consisting of a plasma of deuterium and tritium, which are two isotopes, or forms, of hydrogen.
The fuel was coated on the inside of the capsule in a frozen layer less than the width of a human hair.
At very high temperatures, the nucleus of the deuterium and the nucleus of the tritium fuse, a neutron and something known as an “alpha particle” emerge, and energy is released.
The experiments, published in the journal Nature, created conditions up to three times the density of the sun.
In two experiments described by the researchers that took place in September and November of last year, more energy came out of the fusion fuel than was deposited into it, but it was still less than the total amount deposited into the target.
The deuterium-tritium implosions were more stable than previously achieved. The researchers did so by doubling the laser power earlier in the laser pulse than in earlier tries.
The fusion-energy yield was increased by about tenfold from past experiments, in a series that started last May. One of the experiments produced more than half of the so-called Lawson criteria needed to reach ignition – but only about one-100th of the energy needed for ignition.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, located about 45 miles (70 km) east of San Francisco, is overseen by the National Nuclear Security Administration, an agency of the U.S. Department of Energy.
Eager to exploit the potential this type of energy offers to reduce dependence on oil and other fossil fuels, the United States and other nations have invested many millions of dollars into fusion research, often with uneven results.
There are two main approaches. This team focuses on what’s known as inertial confinement fusion energy – using lasers to compress fuel pellets, which triggers fusion reactions.
Other labs like the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy, which is the British national laboratory for fusion research, and the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory in New Jersey focus on magnetic confinement fusion energy – putting plasma in a magnetic container and heating it up until nuclei fuse.
Steve Cowley, director of the Culham Centre, called new findings “truly excellent” but said different measures of success make it hard to compare with his type of research.
“We have waited 60 years to get close to controlled fusion, and we are now close in both magnetic and inertial confinement research. We must keep at it,” Cowley said in a statement.
Mark Herrmann, a fusion researcher at Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico which is also overseen by the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration, called the new findings important, but sees a “very long road to assessing the viability of fusion as a long-term energy source”.
“I believe a compact carbon-free energy source is very important for humankind in the long term,” he said by email.
“Fusion is one bet. If it pays off, the return will be big.”
11 Comments on "US scientists achieve ‘turning point’ in fusion energy"
DC on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 12:27 am
This is about (x)hundredth ‘breakthrough’ or so, in fusion research. Just a few thousand more to go and they might reach break even point. Reuters should talk about how living simpler, less energy wasteful lives would cost about 1/100000000th of the cost of even a single ‘fuser’.
ghung on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 12:38 am
Children, looking for a bigger, better fire to play with. What could go wrong? Since we humans have used all of our other energy sources so wisely, I wish these folks success. No telling what we could do…
DC on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 12:51 am
The uS of war and coal has actually been cutting fusion research. Not that things would be any better if they threw more dollars at it. Fusion research, as far as amerikans were concerned ended in the 1960s when it was discovered that H-Bombs(aka fusion bombs) were fairly easy to make. After that, interest in the uS of Coal at any rate, fell off rather rapidly. The uS had learned all they wanted to know about fusion power-namely, how to make even deadlier weapons.
No, amerika wont be leading any ‘breakthroughs’ or anything else for that matter. The only thing the uS has money and time for these days, is its global terror machine, and Wall St. Bankers. Anything else is an irritant and a distraction.
Newfie on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 2:21 am
Limitless energy from nuclear fusion is just 10 years away. And it always will be. 😉
Davy, Hermann, MO on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 3:04 am
Well, I have heard this Jazzed song and dance before. “Even if” they achieve an ignition that they speak of as the requirement for a functioning power generation situation we do not have SCALE. A technology is of no use if it cannot be effectively applied in the economy. This technology is not cost effective in the current economic realities we live in. The dollar cost to build out the plants would be prohibitive. The economics require economies of scale which require multiple plant constructions. You know how it is with early efforts they move slowly as the industry must be built up with expertise, equipment, and management. It will take half a generation to get this up to effective introduction. I am saying this with the understanding it becomes a solid technology. It is another distraction in my opinion.
PapaSmurf on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 3:53 am
The echo chamber here at PO.com is truly inspiring to visit. The dynamics debates that you guys have are just so entertaining with all of you agreeing with each other as you wait in the fetal position.
eastbay on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 4:21 am
Oh, this again? Yawn.
Dave Thompson on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 4:48 am
I will believe it when I see it.
DC on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 7:01 am
Yea, this again. Its seems we need to be constantly reminded that the Star Trek Future is still on course, if slightly delayed . Without these constant reminders, we might start to actually question the idea that the ‘infinite progress narrative’ isnt all its cracked up to be. Hell, if the infinite growth economy doest get its preffered infinite power source, people might start getting subversive ideas, like, living simpler, less energy intensive lives is a better idea than forking out 100 Billion or more for nuclear fusion station.
Just a thought….
sunnyboy on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 12:41 pm
Suppose they made that pellet so small it would fit inside a battery. You ignite one pellet and put it in and you have a battery that never runs down. One in your house, one in your car, problem solved…
There is a little room for optimism here.
GregT on Thu, 13th Feb 2014 3:46 pm
“Suppose they made that pellet so small it would fit inside a battery. You ignite one pellet and put it in and you have a battery that never runs down. One in your house, one in your car, problem solved…”
Problem solved? Which problem?
Overpopulation? Resource depletion? Species extinction? Fisheries collapse? Deforestation? Desertification? Famine? Water shortages? Climate change? Pollution? War? Global mass extinction?
There is nothing optimistic about prolonging the destruction of the only planet that we will ever have, and there is nothing optimistic about us causing our own extinction. What we are doing is clearly not sustainable, we either rethink our relationship with the Earth and change our ways, or our species will be terminated.