Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on December 2, 2013

Bookmark and Share

US Military Continues to Move Forward on Clean Energy

Alternative Energy

Speaking at a conference on international security last week, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel said: “Climate change does not directly cause conflict, but it can add to the challenges of global instability, hunger, poverty, and conflict. Food and water shortages, pandemic disease, disputes over refugees and resources, more severe natural disasters — all place additional burdens on economies, societies, and institutions around the world.”

In other words, climate change, in addition to the toll it takes on our health and the economy, also poses risks to national security. The Department of Defense has been addressing the military challenges posed by climate change for more than a decade. In recent years, the DOD has embraced a strategy that will improve energy efficiency in the military, explore and develop new energy technologies, and expand the use of renewable energy on bases and in the field. The Navy and Air Force are aiming to get half their energy from alternative sources by 2020.  The Marines have set a goal to be 50 percent more fuel-efficient in the battlefield by 2025. The Army’s goal is to use 25 percent renewable energy by 2015. The military’s direction is clear: a focus on clean energy and efficiency makes for a more nimble, effective fighting force. Secretary Hagel’s speech signals his commitment to continue on this track, and reinforces the essential role clean energy plays in achieving our national security goals, while reaping benefits for the economy and our environment.

The U.S. Military Academy at West Point, one of five Army bases seeking to achieve net-zero energy use, recently issued a draft plan to improve energy efficiency and generate renewable energy on site. NRDC has been helping advise academy faculty and personnel on clean energy for the past two years. Options under consideration at West Point include installing solar panels on the field house roof (without covering up slogans that say “SINK NAVY!” and “BEAT AIR FORCE!”), solar hot water, geothermal heat pumps, and combined heat and power systems that provide electricity, heating and cooling efficiently. West Point already has two small solar installations and a wind turbine. The draft plan represents a major push forward. The plan’s authors write, “…addressing energy security and sustainability is operationally necessary, financially prudent and essential to mission accomplishment.”

Renewable energy has already taken root throughout the military. North America’s largest solar photovoltaic power plant is at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada. Solar panels at Fort Dix in New Jersey are saving the Army $160,000 each year in energy costs. Fort Bliss, in Texas, which has been using solar power for years, is set to break ground on a new 20-megawatt solar farm—the largest renewable energy project in military history.

Renewable energy installations on military-controlled lands are expected to generate 3,000 megawatts of energy by 2025. That’s 50 percent more energy than the Hoover Dam, and enough to power 750,000 homes. To help ensure that the push to develop renewable energy moves forward smoothly, NRDC and the DOD just released a primer for renewable energy developers. Large-scale renewable energy projects are often sited on or near land used by the military for training and testing. These same lands often hold immense environmental value as well, supporting critical natural resources and rare and threatened wildlife. For a renewable energy project to get off the ground successfully, military and environmental concerns need to be considered up front. The primer provides guidance for developers on how to screen wind and solar projects for potential conflicts. In order to scale up the renewable energy we all want and need, these projects need to be smart from the start.

The DOD is already seeing positive results from its clean energy shift. In Afghanistan last year, energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements, including the use of solar energy at combat outposts, saved roughly 20 million gallons of fuel. Improving energy efficiency and using renewable energy in military operations not only saves money—it also saves lives. The Army estimates that 170 soldiers died protecting fuel convoys in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2007 alone.

The DOD’s work to scale up its use of clean, renewable energy use has impacts that ripple beyond the military theater. As the nation’s largest purchaser of energy, the DOD has the potential to drive changes in the clean energy market. By increasing demand for clean, renewable energy in order to meet its goals of military readiness and protecting national security, the DOD can help boost the expansion of clean energy in the private sector as well. And the cleaner our energy system gets, the more we reduce the risks we all face from climate change.

NRDC



6 Comments on "US Military Continues to Move Forward on Clean Energy"

  1. DC on Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 11:44 pm 

    LoL!

    So why would the NRDC pimp this trash? Probably for the same reason they do things like this

    http://www.oilempire.us/nrdc.html

    Its a not commonly acknowledged fact that many of the ‘big’ green organizations are by now, funded and largely controlled at the executive level at least, by the very corporations whose actions many of theses groups were initially founded to help stop.

    You see what this NRDC writer completely omits to mention is, that the US military is one of the largest single emitters of pollution in the entire world. A few solar panels and heaters will not materially this fact. Not now, and not in 2050. If they US is even capable of terrorizing and garrisoning the world by then on the scale they do currently.

    And does this every single day. For decades.

    But what does corporate control of ‘Green’ NGOs have to do with the brutal US military machine. Well, quite a bit actually. The main mission of the USM is not ‘defence’ against ‘enemies’ but rather its main mission is to defend corporate power and wealth extraction around the globe, mainly in 3rd world countries. So a little greenwash for its corporate shock troops, it is (believed), goes a long way to beautifying the widely hated amerikan militaries image.

    The other (implied) message here, is, if the US military is currently embedded in your nation(ie shooting or droning-killing people randomly), then the US will go to any lengths, including even *gasp*, solar and wind, to make sure things stay that way.

    The NRCD should be as anti-US military as they are pro-environment. Especially since it is US military which has a laundry list of eco-disasters that rival there corporate partners.

  2. BillT on Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 12:51 am 

    “… The DoD uses 360,000 barrels of oil each day. This amount makes the DoD the single largest oil consumer in the world. There are only 35 countries in the world consuming more oil than DoD. The U.S. Air Force is the largest oil consumer within the DoD services….”

    Nuff said…

  3. Kenz300 on Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 5:44 am 

    Safer, cleaner and cheaper alternative energy sources are growing in use with the military and around the world.

    The price of oil, coal and nuclear keeps rising and causing environmental damage.

    It is time to speed up the transition to alternative energy sources.

  4. Norm on Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 8:16 am 

    Its very important that our tanks should get better fuel economy, while they roll into remote settlements and blow away mud huts full of starving villagers. :o)

  5. Norm on Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 8:20 am 

    Along with renewable energy and low-carbon footprint for the US military, there should be non-toxic lead-free bullets for shooting people, also kinder gentler hand-grenades. The surface-to-air missiles should also have an exhaust that is NOx free, to be less irritating to the respiratory system. I trust Congress will get to work right away on these pressing issues.

  6. Arthur on Tue, 3rd Dec 2013 1:20 pm 

    Until the time that environment polluting lead bullets are replaced by marsh mellows, it is difficult to take environmental policies of the military, any military, serious.

    Seriously, the military is an organization specialized in causing as much destruction as possible. Relating these clubs with environmental issues is plain silly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *