Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on December 2, 2012

Bookmark and Share

Peter Thiel, Bill Gates, Khosla Get Behind Energy Storage Start-Up LightSail in $37M Deal

Peter Thiel, Bill Gates, Khosla Get Behind Energy Storage Start-Up LightSail in $37M Deal thumbnail

A clean-tech start-up that thinks it has solved a problem that has vexed engineers for decades–how to effectively store energy generated by wind and sunshine–has gained some heavyweight financial backers.

Danielle Fong and her co-founders are attempting to solve a problem that has long bedeviled engineers.

An investment group that includes Bill Gates and Peter Thiel, the co-founder of PayPal and the first outside investor in Facebook Inc. FB +2.49%, has poured $37.3 million into LightSail Energy, a three-year-old start-up dreamed up by a Princeton graduate school dropout. Thiel led the investment.

Danielle Fong, now 25, said it took LightSail about a year to raise the Series D funding because investors are more wary of clean technology since solar power company Solyndra spectacularly failed in 2011. Solyndra burned through nearly $1 billion from private investors and more than $500 million in Department of Energy loans before declaring bankruptcy.

LightSail has found investors “who can truly think for themselves,” she said.

While wind produces energy when it’s blowing and the sun when it’s shining, storing renewable energy in large quantities, for ongoing use, is tricky. Common approaches have included electrochemical batteries, mechanical devices such as flywheels, and liquefied air.

“The overall problem of how to store large amounts of energy is one we’ve been working on for a century without a lot of success,” said co-founder and Chief Executive Steve Crane. “We’re good at cell phone and laptop batteries and maybe scaling to run cars, but that’s as far as we’ve gone successfully up to now.”

Fong, who at the time she co-founded the company had dropped out of a Ph.D. program at Princeton University that she began when she was 17, began thinking that water and compressed air could be combined to solve the energy storage problem. Water spray, because of its high surface area and heat capacity, would work extremely well as a heat exchanger, she reasoned.

By spraying water droplets into the air as it compresses in a technique called isothermal compression, the droplets absorb most of the heat, so that the air’s temperature doesn’t change much and most of the energy is still available. The water is then separated from the air and recycled.

LightSail Energy
Prototype energy-storage system made by LightSail Energy.

The founding team ripped up an old firehouse in Oakland, Calif., so they could install pipes and build a prototype of a reversible system that stores and releases energy by compressing and expanding air.

There are hurdles to LightSail’s approach–water droplets, for instance, need to be the right size and volume, and they need to be pumped in without using too much energy.

Another risk of isothermal compression is that water can get trapped inside a cylinder, in a condition called hydrolock, and cause the cylinder to explode, Crane said. But these problems haven’t occurred with LightSail’s technology, he said.

The technology intrigued Gates, the Microsoft co-founder who is a limited partner in Khosla Ventures, a LightSail backer since 2009. Thiel, who created controversy last year when he declared at a TechCrunch conference in San Francisco that clean-tech was a “disaster,” was also convinced.

In a statement, Thiel said that “it’s time to find honest companies that can develop technologies that stand on real innovation instead of the backs of taxpayers.”

Two competitors, General Compression and SustainX, are also working on technology that uses compressed air to store energy. Both companies have received funding from the U.S. Department of Energy. Crane said LightSail was rejected in its bid for Department of Energy funding, though he wouldn’t rule out pursuing government funding in the future.

LightSail is now in talks with potential customers, which include solar and wind developers and large industrial companies that want more control over their power supplies, Crane said. Over time, he said, the technology should cease to be exotic and will become “mainstream, grid-scale energy technology.”

First, though, the company has to ship products. LightSail’s website depicts them as air storage tanks with power units that can fit inside shipping containers. They are now likely due in 2014.

LightSail has raised a total of $52.3 million. Other financial backers include Innovacorp and individual investors. Valuation is not disclosed.

 

WSJ



8 Comments on "Peter Thiel, Bill Gates, Khosla Get Behind Energy Storage Start-Up LightSail in $37M Deal"

  1. GregT on Sun, 2nd Dec 2012 7:34 am 

    The first law of thermodynamics still applies, invest your assets wisely.

  2. EnergyUnlimited on Sun, 2nd Dec 2012 8:57 am 

    Silly girl,
    Forgotten about energy lost to warm water, what also incidentally keep air cool…

    But if she manage to chip off few millions $ off Bill Gates – good for her.

  3. Kenz300 on Sun, 2nd Dec 2012 4:51 pm 

    Gates and Thiel are no strangers to evaluating technology or making money.

    Some new technologies will succeed and most will fail. There was once 600 automobile manufacturers in Indiana. Almost all failed to survive. But the auto industry continues to grow and develop.

    Climate change is real and the need to transition to safe, clean alternative energy sources is clear. A break thru in energy storage will help to speed up the transition. Let’s hope that some of the worlds energy entrepreneurs are successful.

  4. DC on Sun, 2nd Dec 2012 5:16 pm 

    Ummm Ken, Gates is no stranger to taking ALREADY EXISTING technology and then using *that* to make money. He made his fortune through a combination of luck, and using technologies that others, mainly IBM in this case, did all the heavy lifting to develop. Very little of what Gates has ‘given’ the world is really new, or even all that good. Unix and Linux are bother superior to MS in just every way possible. Gates is living proof you dont have to be smart to be one of the 1%, just lucky. That, and having a strong desire to buy out and bury all the real innovators does not hurt either.

    Gates almost invested in the tar-sands, till the bad publicity made him reconsider. He always slams wind and solar, instead preferring to promote complex, fragile(expensive) and finnicky techniques for power generation, or simply more fossil-fuels. He is the last person any interested in sustainability should be looking up to….

  5. Rick on Sun, 2nd Dec 2012 10:18 pm 

    Sorry, this all sounds like BS to me. I also have never cared for Gates.

  6. BillT on Mon, 3rd Dec 2012 1:24 am 

    Bravo Rick. Gates got where he is by luck and greed, not intelligence. Truly intelligent people don’t care about money because they know it is nothing. Stephen Hawking or Einstein are good examples. Neither desired to become rich or famous, but are known by most of the world for their intelligence.

  7. Beery on Mon, 3rd Dec 2012 2:43 am 

    Gates now has the money to waste on pie-in-the-sky investments if he wants. But that’s not how he made his money. As others have said, he made his money by being the pirate of Silicon Valley. If Warren Buffet (a guy who made his money through savvy investing) gets involved, then I’ll pay attention.

  8. Arthur on Tue, 4th Dec 2012 8:38 am 

    Gates very accidently got his money because he happened to own an operating system he did not write at the very moment when IBM came up with hardware and microprocessor that could be afforded by lots of private people. And needed an OS. That Gates had on his shelf. The real achievement was done by IBM, not Gates. Gates got tons of money that he did use smartly to develop his OS.

    Having said that I am all for it that people like Gates invest in this kind of crucial storage technology. Wind and solar have achieved a level of sophistication that it can compete with carbons. What is missing is storage technology to bridge the intermittent character of these sources.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *