Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on March 18, 2014

Bookmark and Share

Machinery of an Energy Dream

Machinery of an Energy Dream thumbnail

Fusion, the process that powers the sun, is the forever dream of energy scientists — safe, nonpolluting and almost boundless. Even here at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, where the primary focus of fusion work involves nuclear weapons, many scientists talk poetically about how it could end the world’s addiction to fossil fuels.

“It’s the dream of the future, solving energy,” said Stephen E. Bodner, a retired physicist who worked on fusion at Livermore in the 1960s and ’70s, recalling that the military focus was basically a cover story, a way to keep government money flowing to the lab for energy research.

“Everyone was winking,” he said. “Everyone knew better.”

The basic concept behind fusion is simple: Squeeze hydrogen atoms hard enough and they fuse together in helium. A helium atom weighs slightly less than the original hydrogen atoms, and by Einstein’s equation E = mc2, that liberated bit of mass turns into energy. Hydrogen is so abundant that unlike fossil fuels or fissionable material like uranium, it will never run out.

But controlled fusion is still a dream, avidly pursued and perpetually out of reach. Scientists have never figured out a way to keep a fusion reaction going long enough to generate usable energy. The running joke is that “fusion is 30 years in the future — and always will be.”

Now, however, scientists here have given the world some hopeful progress. Last month, a team headed by Omar A. Hurricane announced that it had used Livermore’s giant lasers to fuse hydrogen atoms and produce flashes of energy, like miniature hydrogen bombs. The amount of energy produced was tiny — the equivalent of what a 60-watt light bulb consumes in five minutes. But that was five times the output of attempts a couple of years ago.

When a physicist named Hurricane generates significant bursts of fusion energy with 192 mega-lasers, the Twitterverse revels in the comic book possibilities.

“Wasn’t he in X-Men?” one person tweeted.

“Awesome science story, but there’s a zero percent chance that a fusion laser scientist named Dr. Hurricane isn’t a supervillain,” another chimed in.

Actually, Dr. Hurricane, 45, is more Clark Kent than superhero. Instead of saving the world, his ambition is to explore the scientific puzzle in front of him.

He said it was too early to speculate about future laser-fusion power plants, and tried to deflect credit to the more than 20 scientists on the team. “I don’t want it to be about me or my funny name,” he said.

The fusion reaction occurred at the National Ignition Facility, a Livermore project with a controversial and expensive history. After the United States ended underground nuclear testing in 1992, lab officials argued that some way was needed to verify that the weapons would work as computer models said they would. The National Nuclear Security Administration, part of the Department of Energy, agreed.

Photo

A technician at the National Ignition Facility monitored work on a defective optic. Credit Jim Wilson/The New York Times

The key to the facility is its middle name — ignition. For simplistic government purposes, ignition was defined as a fusion reaction producing as much energy as the laser beams that hit it. To achieve that, an initial smidgen of fusion has to cascade to neighboring hydrogen atoms.

The center of NIF is the target chamber, a metal sphere 33 feet wide with gleaming diagnostic equipment radiating outward. It looks like something from “Star Trek.” Indeed, it has been in “Star Trek,” doubling as the engine room of the Enterprise in last year’s “Star Trek Into Darkness” movie. (NIF’s vast banks of laser amplifiers also served as a backdrop for a starship commanded by a renegade Starfleet admiral.)

The laser complex fills a building with a footprint equal to three football fields. Each blast starts with a small laser pulse that is split via partly reflecting mirrors into 192, then bounced back and forth through laser amplifiers that fill a couple of warehouse-size rooms before the beams are focused into the target chamber, converging on a gold cylinder that is about the size and shape of a pencil eraser.

The laser beams enter at the top and bottom of the cylinder, their heat generating an intense bath of X-rays that rushes inward to compress a peppercorn-size pellet. The pellet contains a layer of carefully frozen deuterium and tritium, the heavier forms of hydrogen, and in a brief moment — about one ten-billionth of a second — the imploding atoms fuse together.

The scientists call it bang time.

Each shot is so short that the cost in electricity is just $5.

Livermore officials were confident enough that NIF would achieve ignition soon after it was turned on that they laid out a plan for building a demonstration power plant, called Laser Inertial Fusion Energy with the appealing acronym LIFE, technology they said could be ready for the world’s electrical grids by the 2030s.

Dr. Bodner, who had left Livermore in 1975 and set up a competing program at the Naval Research Laboratory, was a persistent critic of NIF. In 1995, he wrote a paper predicting that instabilities in the imploding gas would thwart ignition.

Photo

Dr. Omar A. Hurricane in front of the National Ignition Facility’s target chamber in Livermore, Calif., which doubled as the Enterprise’s engine room in the movie “Star Trek Into Darkness.” Credit Jim Wilson/The New York Times

“Why did they go forward with something that failed almost immediately?” he said in an interview.

Dr. Bodner championed a different laser fusion concept that he believed would work far better for a power plant. The gold cylinder in Livermore’s design is inefficient. Not all of the laser energy is converted into X-rays; most of the X-rays miss the pellet. Only 0.5 percent of the laser energy reaches the fuel.

In Dr. Bodner’s designs, the lasers shine directly on the fuel pellets. That creates other technical difficulties, but Dr. Bodner said his team was able to show those could be overcome. He retired in 1999.

NIF began firing its lasers in 2009. A banner unfurled on the outside of the building proclaimed, “Bringing Star Power to Earth.” But for all of the technical wizardry, the first three years of bang time were largely a bust.

Livermore’s computer simulations had predicted robust implosions leading to ignition. Instead, each pellet released just a bit of energy. Livermore officials remained publicly confident. Edward Moses, then NIF’s director, told the journal Nature, “We have all the capability to make it happen in fiscal year 2012.”

It did not happen. The cost of building and operating NIF to date is $5.3 billion.

In stars like our sun, the immense gravity provides the squeeze that enables fusion. On earth, there are two main possibilities: powerful lasers to jam the hydrogen together, as at NIF, or magnetic fields to contain a hot hydrogen plasma until the atoms collide and fuse. Most fusion energy research has focused on the latter approach, particularly doughnut-shaped machines known as tokamaks.

From the 1970s to the mid-1990s, the amount of power produced by ever larger machines doubled every year, on average. In 1994, the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor at Princeton generated 10.7 million watts of power for a brief moment. Three years later, the Joint European Torus in England topped that, at 16 million watts.

Photo

A tiny drop of glue was placed on the surface of a test target. A crystal was cemented to the target. Credit Jim Wilson/The New York Times

But by then, without an immediate energy crisis, government financing of fusion research had dipped sharply.

The next step is a mammoth international collaboration known as Iter, originally an acronym for International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, but now referring to the Latin for “the way.” Construction on Iter has begun in southern France, with the first operations expected to begin in the 2020s — if it comes together.

Under a byzantine, dispersed management structure, the partners in the project (the European Union, Japan, China, Russia, the United States, India and South Korea) agreed to contribute pieces of the reactor, with the central Iter organization attempting to coordinate. A review criticized Iter’s management for delays and cost overruns. Iter officials, however, say they are fixing the problems.

“This is a risk we consider well managed,” said Carlos Alejaldre, an Iter deputy director general.

General Atomics, a company in San Diego, is responsible for a main piece of the American contribution, a stack of huge magnetic coils at the center of Iter that will help control the shape of the hydrogen gas within the doughnut-shaped ring. The company has spent the past few years rounding up the machinery it will need to produce the seven coils, each more than 13 feet wide and weighing 120 tons. It will begin manufacturing a test coil this summer, and company officials say they are on track to finish production on schedule.

If Iter succeeds, a demonstration fusion power plant is to follow.

Tony S. Taylor, General Atomics’s vice president for magnetic fusion energy, started there in 1979. “I wanted to do something that was useful for the future of mankind,” he said. Back then, practical fusion power was expected to be 30 years away.

Thirty-five years later, Dr. Taylor, nearing retirement age, is still waiting. “It could have happened on that time scale,” he said. “What’s limiting our progress is funding.”

Photo

Technicians at the National Ignition Facility’s target chamber. Credit Jim Wilson/The New York Times

For most of his Livermore career, Dr. Hurricane worked in the classified shadows as a nuclear weapons designer. In 2009, he received a prestigious award for solving a mystery first recognized in the 1960s involving the physics of what happens inside nuclear bombs, although he still cannot say much about that.

“There was a discrepancy there,” he said, carefully choosing words. It was not a limitation of computer simulations but something more fundamental. “It was more mysterious,” he said. “We actually did resolve what the discrepancy was and understand the origin of the problem..”

With NIF’s failure at ignition, Dr. Hurricane was asked to take a fresh look. “The managers knew I just like solving problems,” he said. “And I don’t have any other ambition,” he joked.

In the rush to achieve ignition, the NIF scientists had used laser pulses that hit the fuel pellet as hard as possible, but the pellet was being ripped apart before fusion occurred. Dr. Hurricane adjusted the laser pulse to warm the gold cylinder initially. That reduced the implosion pressure, but calmed some of the instabilities, yielding a higher rate of fusion.

In September, Dr. Hurricane’s team had its first shot that showed signs of the fusion reaction spreading through the fuel.

“Now we at least have a sparking match,” said Jeff Wisoff, NIF’s acting director.

Since then, they have nudged up the energy by using cylinders of depleted uranium instead of gold, although the output is still considerably short of ignition.

But Dr. Hurricane is not aiming to solve the world’s energy problems.

“I actually don’t constrain myself personally with the practical applications at this point,” he said. “We don’t have to get a home run here.” In his baseball analogy, he said, he was looking to just get on base with singles and walks, and if enough small things work, then perhaps NIF will get to ignition.

Even then, practical fusion would still likely be decades away. NIF, at its quickest, fires once every few hours. The targets take weeks to build with artisan precision. A commercial laser fusion power plant would probably have to vaporize fuel pellets at a rate of 10 per second.

And if Dr. Bodner is right, the best approach is not even being pursued.

NY Times



8 Comments on "Machinery of an Energy Dream"

  1. Northwest Resident on Tue, 18th Mar 2014 2:59 pm 

    So, as it turns out, way back in 1977 when Jimmy Carter announced to the world that America was on the verge of experiencing severe energy problems which could “affect our strength and our power as a nation”, the taxpayers were unwittingly funding fusion research operating under the guise of weapons research.

    I have no doubt whatsoever that back in 1977, with all the wonderful technological achievements that scientists and corporations were racking up, that the American government and top scientists BELIEVED that fusion energy technology “could be ready for the world’s electrical grids by the 2030s.”

    They KNEW that peak oil was a pressing problem way back in 1977. They BET THE FUCKING FARM on fusion energy coming to the rescue. They plowed ahead with unrestrained BAU, thinking that they had the future energy crisis handled.

    But they were wrong.

    Now, here we are, with a constant stream of articles telling us that fusion energy is just one massive investment away from final success, just a few more experiments away from becoming reality and powering the world. But it is all B.S. The dream is fading fast, and with it, the grand plans of a financial and corporate elite that smugly believed they could continue the rape and plunder of planet earth forever, even way back in 1977.

    We all (well, most of us except for little blue cartoon character-like fools) know that BAU is being artificially kept alive via every financial and fraudulent trick in the book. And we ask ourselves, why are we prolonging the PAIN and devastation? The answer, based on the clear sounding ring of truth that this article brings, might be that there is some last desperate measure of hope that if we can just hang on long enough, fusion energy will finally become reality and save the day for the financial and corporate elite. It is a dream that they can’t let go of.

    BAU is like a man hanging by his fingers at the edge of a steep cliff, clutching for a firmer grip as the dirt and pebbles crumble along the edges. It is fusion energy or doom, and we know which one of those is closer to reality than the other.

  2. bobinget on Tue, 18th Mar 2014 3:01 pm 

    Even on cloudy days we can spot OUR fusion reactor.
    If fact, it just peeked it’s head over a mountain range here on America’s West Coast. Recent history tells us
    our, yours and mine, reactor will provide enough energy in the next eight hours to power an entire
    time zone if we cared enough.

  3. DC on Tue, 18th Mar 2014 4:32 pm 

    Here is it again, from the Us premiere propaganda rag, the NYT’s. Not content to create a fake, imaginary world full of ‘terrorists’ and Evil Russian empires and ‘mad mullahs’ with nukes, they are now into creating fake science as well.

    “Fusion, the process that powers the sun, is the forever dream of energy scientists — safe, nonpolluting and almost boundless.”

    Of course it is a ‘dream’.In a dream-world, yes fusion would be all the above, in reality, no. Because fusion is none of those three things. Not even close. Yet the article opens with those as the basic underlying premise of the article. No wonder our people are so ill-informed, on just every topic these days. I hope someone submits a comment at the NTYs to this effect. But then again, leading politicians and or pro-nuke advocates, whether technically trained or not, continue to insist nuclear ‘fission’ is ~ to green energy, or ‘low’ carbon. So I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised by any of this…..

  4. Northwest Resident on Tue, 18th Mar 2014 5:07 pm 

    DC — Read it again, especially the last few paragraphs. Characterizing this article as promoting fusion as an actual solution to the world’s energy problems is a misinterpretation.

    Did you read the part where it says, “…if enough small things work, then perhaps NIF will get to ignition. Even then, practical fusion would still likely be decades away.”

    That sounds realistic and not overly optimistic to me.

    But then again, it seems to me that you frequently misinterpret information, which leads you to say really insane things like “…the Us premiere propaganda rag, the NYT’s. Not content to create a fake, imaginary world full of ‘terrorists’ and Evil Russian empires and ‘mad mullahs’ with nukes, they are now into creating fake science as well”. — A little overly dramatic at best, quite mad and totally incorrect at worst.

  5. J-Gav on Tue, 18th Mar 2014 5:09 pm 

    NIF might get to ignition – “Even then, practical fusion would still likely be decades away.” Takeaway? You can safely wait a few years before reading any new articles on fusion.

  6. DC on Tue, 18th Mar 2014 5:37 pm 

    Maybe you should read it again NWR, the admission its long way from any sort of realization is only the author belatedly acknowledging the simple fact that fusion does not exist. He wont admit the possibility it may never exist, something those of us the real world are allowed to do you know.

    Again, in case the point my point too was too subtle for you,is how fusion is being marketed to the brain-dead masses, fusion and clean, safe, limitless-not true. Is there some part of that you get understand NWR? The damn article opened with that-again, too complex for you? Did you fall for the nuclear fission and electricity too cheap to meter lie as well? Maybe you did, maybe you think its true even now, who can say? Either way its not my problem. Your issue, and you state it over and over again, is your love of the status-quo and the casual acceptance of whatever BS or slop the MSM put in front on you. Thats fine, but stop with the ‘mischaracterization’ horseshit. As a master of it yourself, you should know better.

  7. Northwest Resident on Tue, 18th Mar 2014 6:32 pm 

    DC — Again, you totally misinterpret. What you think you see is not what is really there. Did you read my initial comment on this page? If so, how could you arrive at your conclusions about me and what you say are my issues? You have some good qualities, DC. I just hate to think that you’re going to go through life without somebody trying to let you know that you’re not doing a good job, or even a piss-poor job, of interpreting facts into an accurate representation of reality. Your rant just posted leaves me feeling nothing but pity for you, as do all of your posted rants. I’d like to see you get a better grip on reality, and I’m just trying to nudge you in the right direction.

    “It’s the dream of the future, solving energy…”. Then the article goes on to explain how they have tried but failed, perhaps due to lack of funding according to one of the quoted scientists.

    The article posted in no way whatsoever makes an attempt to promote fusion energy as a realistic solution to our energy problems, except for “maybe” many decades in the future. If you don’t get that, then it is no surprise.

  8. Makati1 on Wed, 19th Mar 2014 2:29 am 

    …“What’s limiting our progress is funding.”…

    BINGO! There is the real reason for this article. To pimp for the techies living off of the taxpayer’s blood.

    All of these guys will be able to retire before they produce a profitable commercial reactor, or maybe, dead of old age. And the key is ‘profitable’ as nothing gets made/built that does not make a profit. It’s called Capitalism.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *