Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on June 3, 2014

Bookmark and Share

ITER fusion reactor project is moving forward

ITER fusion reactor project is moving forward thumbnail

Nobody said it was going to be easy. After years of delays, work has finally begun on key components of ITER, the ambitious international project to build a revolutionary nuclear fusion reactor. ITER remains dogged by its own complexity, however, and its director-general says that it may not now fire up until 2023 – three years later than the most recent official deadline.

ITER’s ultimate aim is to generate energy in the same way that the sun does, by fusing hydrogen nuclei to form helium. It will do this by using a magnetic field to confine a superheated hydrogen plasma inside a doughnut-shaped reactor called a tokamak.

A collaboration between China, Russia, India, Japan Korea, the US and the EU, ITER’s reactor will be larger and far more intricate than any previous tokamak. It will have as many as 10 million parts – its builders call it the puzzle with 10 million pieces – and will sit at the centre of a vast support system. The result will rival the Large Hadron Collider for the title of most complex machine on earth.

Progress on ITER has been slow – it was first conceived during diplomatic talks between US president Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1985. Now, at last, the pieces of the puzzle are falling into place, although most of the ITER site, at Cadarache in southern France, is still barren. That is because the real action is taking place elsewhere.

Sun, sea and steel

The French Riviera is more generally associated with sun and sea than with mega engineering projects. When I visit the facility in La Seyne-sur-Mer where some of ITER’s biggest components are being prepared, a fierce mistral is blowing off the land to the Mediterranean. CNIM, the contractor that owns the facility, started out as a shipbuilder before turning to precision engineering. Its maritime location is an advantage: many of ITER’s components are so heavy that they have to be transported by sea.

 

In one of the facility’s climate-controlled warehouses, a huge drill is carving channels into a D-shaped loop of high-grade stainless steel- so large that it takes me nearly a minute to walk its circumference. The steel, chosen for its strength at low temperatures, is so tough that the carbide bits milling it must be replaced every eight minutes. It needs to be: seven of these loops will be stacked on top of each other to form one of the many magnets that will confine and direct hydrogen plasma at up to 100 million °C in the reactor vessel.

Before that, though, a complicated journey lies ahead. The loops’ next stop will be La Spezia, Italy, where a contractor will fit up to 700 metres of superconducting cable to each one; then they will travel to Venice, where another firm, Simic, will complete their assembly into structures called toroidal field coils, each weighing about the same as a fully laden Boeing 747. Simic is also milling some of the loops, so those will have to make a round trip to La Spezia and back.

The coils will then voyage to a French port, where they will be loaded onto a 800-tonne, 352-wheeled crawler that inches through 104 kilometres of countryside, crossing specially strengthened bridges and squeezing through carefully widened roads, to Cadarache. If all goes to plan, the first coils will arrive at the ITER site in about three years’ time.

Deadline implausible

Still, progress on the toroidal coils seems faster than on the second of the reactor’s key magnetic arrays, the so-called poloidal field coils. The building specially built for their construction is impressively large but mostly empty, save for half a dozen crates and a circular crane that hangs from the roof like a vast yellow spider, as it has been since 2012 when New Scientist last visited.

Following mounting criticism of ITER’s progress, director-general Osamu Motojima is striving to put the monumental project on “a more realistic schedule”. He told New Scientist that the difficulty of integrating the parts supplied by ITER’s myriad partners made the current deadline of 2020 for “first plasma” implausible; 2022 or 2023 are more likely.

Even once first plasma has been achieved, the reactor will spend years running experimentally before switching to the deuterium-tritium mix needed to generate substantial power. Motojima hopes this second milestone, scheduled for 2027, will still be achievable.

All this is taking its toll on morale. Several of the senior ITER figures I spoke to felt that ITER’s politics – with member states jostling for contracts, and supposedly identical parts often made by different manufacturers on different continents – together with the technical challenges, made even Motojima’s revised timeframe unworkable. They are quietly banking on 2025 or beyond. “I hope I see first plasma while I’m still on the project,” says Neil Mitchell, head of ITER’s magnets division.

Others are enjoying the ride. “ITER is not the first mega project: it’s a great challenge, but it’s also great fun,” says Ken Blackler, who will have the job of fitting together the giant components inside the tightly confined wall of the reactor, Tetris-style.

The most impassioned advocate I hear from is Mark Henderson, who runs the microwave system that will help heat the plasma. He argues forcefully that fusion is the only adequate response to climate change. “Grasping the sun and bringing it to earth is greater than going to the moon and decoding DNA,” he says. But he too agrees that the rate of development needs to accelerate, and the road to practical fusion power may be a long one.

Those working on ITER today may have to live in the knowledge that the fruit of their labours will be reaped by others.

newscientist.com



12 Comments on "ITER fusion reactor project is moving forward"

  1. chilphil1986 on Tue, 3rd Jun 2014 7:33 pm 

    2023, eh? Pardon me while I hold my breath. Seriously? We’ll be dismantling it for the scrap before it fires up.

  2. Davy, Hermann, MO on Tue, 3rd Jun 2014 7:39 pm 

    Chill, when the reports are anything more than 3 years you know there are serious issues. When it is 5 to 10 years then they have no idea of a start date.

  3. chilphil1986 on Tue, 3rd Jun 2014 7:53 pm 

    Plus, just reading the article, the sheer magnitude of complexity on this behemoth is staggering. It’s silly to compare this project to gunsmithing, but the Mosin-Nagant rifle was one of the most rugged and dependable models of rifle for one reason: simplicity of design. This ITER is a fool’s errand. If a task can’t be accomplished simply, then there should be serious questions raised concerning its sustainability and reliability.

  4. J on Tue, 3rd Jun 2014 11:27 pm 

    It’s so obvious – that even if the thing works – the electricity will be so expensive coming out of it that it makes no sense to build one. It must be 20x more complicated than a regular nuclear plant to build and operate.

  5. Perk Earl on Wed, 4th Jun 2014 12:10 am 

    “Progress on ITER has been slow – it was first conceived during diplomatic talks between US president Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1985.”

    And now they are estimating completion in 2023, which is 38 years in the making, using, get this, 10 million parts!

    “…seven of these loops will be stacked on top of each other to form one of the many magnets that will confine and direct hydrogen plasma at up to 100 million °C in the reactor vessel.”

    How hot? What could go wrong? This is a science experiment, nothing more.

    Einstein said, “Out of simplicity arises complexity.” But you don’t want to start out with extreme levels of complexity because there is too much to go wrong and every time something snaps the whole thing must be stopped and fixed. But it may not even be that easy to fix. What if the part needing to be replaced is inside many other parts that cannot be removed to get to it out, without spending years and billions of dollars? Then you stand there and just shake your head asking wtf do we do now?

  6. GregT on Wed, 4th Jun 2014 4:13 am 

    There are three distinct ‘parts’ to a human being. The physical, the psychological, and the spiritual. All three must be healthy to achieve homeostasis.

    The further we attempt to separate ourselves from our natural environment, the less spiritual we become. Human technology is not only destroying our spirituality, it is destroying that with which we have a spiritual connection with, the Earth.

    The last thing that we, or the Earth needs, is more human technology. This should be crystal clear by now, but we are being dominated by our physical, and psychological beings. We believe that more stuff will make us ‘complete’, but in reality, we always had the ‘stuff’ that we were searching for to begin with.

    We are headed in completely the wrong direction here, one that will not end well.

  7. bob97062 on Wed, 4th Jun 2014 4:55 am 

    I think the ITER is a pipe dream.

    Focus Fusion is a much more likely to succeed. http://lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/

  8. Davy, Hermann, MO on Wed, 4th Jun 2014 5:28 am 

    ITER is a fool’s game. Even if they get it to work the system will not support it by that time frame. I guess it is a sources of optimism so should we abandon it? I say yes because forced simplicity is what we need to throw money at now. This is a paradox because one would think forced simplicity will be less costly than BAU but mitigating forced de-growth will be an expensive affair. Many systems and infrastructure will become non-operational requiring big efforts at mitigation and adaptation. ITER is the peak of Absurdity in my mind but I am not an expert of the whole process. I do think studying collapse issues for 10 years day in day out I do have a level of competence to say ITER will not be supportable or sustainable in a forced de-growth world where globalism and global finance become dysfunctional.

  9. Davy, Hermann, MO on Wed, 4th Jun 2014 5:33 am 

    Profound words Greg that we should live by now!

    There are three distinct ‘parts’ to a human being. The physical, the psychological, and the spiritual. All three must be healthy to achieve homeostasis.

  10. Jonas Brown on Wed, 4th Jun 2014 12:29 pm 

    While billions are spent on an outdated project, there are new fusion approaches even more promising and cheaper that are ever more evolved to harness the fusion energy first. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8n7j5k-_G8

  11. Norm on Wed, 4th Jun 2014 5:07 pm 

    Anybody want a good deal on a 5 gallon pail full of slightly worn end mill bits ? WELFARE BUMS.

  12. eastbay on Wed, 4th Jun 2014 5:43 pm 

    In the early 70s we just knew the cheap, nearly limitless energy offered by nuclear fusion was only twenty years away. I still believe that with all my heart, too! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *